|
|
|
They still need a head.
Why do all these robot makers not give the things at least a vestigial head?
|
|
|
|
|
It's just a small gymnast in a costume.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Can't wait until we become their pets.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
That's what we have graphite bombs for.
|
|
|
|
|
Very impressive engineering. The amount of stress on those joints is really quite high. It is one of the problems with robotics, the materials available to man are really not as good as bone and cartilage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Growing up as the "geek kid" that would always be picked on, I quite related to Gomer.
|
|
|
|
|
Surprise! Surprise! Surprise!
|
|
|
|
|
Not really at 87 it wasn't.
|
|
|
|
|
Just bought a bag of nuts form Tesco with a flash on the front advising of an important allergen update. Looking at the back of the pack with some urgency, I saw the following:
Ingredients: Almonds, Cashew Nuts, Brazil Nuts, Hazelnuts, Peanuts
Allergy Advice For allergens, see ingredients in bold. Also, may contain other nuts.
Now, the only thing that I can think of that may have been added is "Also, may contain other nuts" - at which point I'm somewhat at a loss to understand how anyone with a nut allergy would go anywhere near a packet bearing the title "Unsalted Mixed Nuts."
Am I missing something?
98.4% of statistics are made up on the spot.
|
|
|
|
|
That's the lawyer equivalent of "paid per line of code".
System.ItDidntWorkException: Something didn't work as expected.
C# - How to debug code[ ^].
Seriously, go read these articles.
Dave Kreskowiak
|
|
|
|
|
PeejayAdams wrote: Am I missing something? Yes. Without that warning anyone with an allergy could buy a pack just so they could sue Tesco.
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed.
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
|
|
|
|
|
PeejayAdams wrote: Am I missing something?
Common sense, isn't that common.
|
|
|
|
|
I've seen Peanut butter with the warning "may contain nuts" before ...
However, I've never seen that warning on the Houses of Parliament.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
And since when are peanuts actually nuts, depite the name[^]? They should better write 'Could contain beans'.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
|
|
|
|
|
Reminds me of a carton of milk that had "Allergy information: contains milk" printed on its side.
Would never have guessed THAT.
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog> .
|
|
|
|
|
|
OKA - Otherwise Known As
So at work I am actually blessed with one of the better machines that the developers have -- an i5, 8GB, 5400 RPM drive. OK, I could live with that except for all the crap that they put on it for security purposes. As a result, the machine is crippled to the point of being unusable for web development, and barely usable for desktop development.
So I finally got around to installing an Oracle VM on a USB SSD with W10, VS2017, SQL Express, etc. I allocated 4GB RAM and the 4 processors to it, bridged the NAT, and put the code I have to work on onto the VM. It's considerably faster than the actual desktop machine, and I also now have access to GMail and other sites that are blocked, no, not by the network routers, but by client-side software that monitors the URL's
The irony of installing a VM to improve my productivity.
|
|
|
|
|
I hear that, especially the "multiple security software" thing.
Describing our enterprise virtual environment here would probably get me fired for the language I'd use.
Not to make you jealous or anything, but, on my desk, I've got my laptop, opened up for the monitor, and 3 other monitors, two of which are connected to the laptop. This is my workhorse/dev machine.
The last monitor is connected to the desktop on my right with a Core i5, 24GB RAM, 5400RPM spinning rust, and 1TB SSD. This is my virtual host that I do all of my testing on, both my normal job and dev work. (Dev is not my primary job!) It's currently running 5 VM's simultaneously, out of the 12 I have built, and the performance of the host and all of the VMs beat the crap out of anything I have running on the enterprise virtual environment. I could run all 12 of my local VM's and still get better performance than the enterprise hosted machines.
As for security, don't get me started with the love affair some vendors have with FTP.
System.ItDidntWorkException: Something didn't work as expected.
C# - How to debug code[ ^].
Seriously, go read these articles.
Dave Kreskowiak
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Kreskowiak wrote: Not to make you jealous or anything
That's my configuration at home, sans 1 monitor. It's a joy to work with, which makes commuting so I can "work" on their antiquated crap all that more painful. And the irony is, for a company that provides, among other things, auto insurance, and even has written articles about the increasing number of fatalities, injuries, and cost of auto insurance, they are cutting back their work at home policy. Just makes me
I am seriously considering hiding my laptop (I got "questioned" by management when I had it sitting on my desk) and hooking it up to the primary monitor with one of those sync keyboard and mouse to the desktop box and other monitor.
Dave Kreskowiak wrote: As for security, don't get me started with the love affair some vendors have with FTP.
Oh lord, don't remind me. I have to deal with that too. Not to mention converting nice relational data to flat files so they can be SFTP'd to third party vendors that still use COBOL.
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: I am seriously considering hiding my laptop (I got "questioned" by management when I had it sitting on my desk) and hooking it up to the primary monitor with one of those sync keyboard and mouse to the desktop box and other monitor.
Hmmm... as I start thinking about the smallest SBC I can find that still runs Visual Studio and will probably do so with better performance. Stick it to the back of the monitor, wireless keyboard and mouse, ... YEAH, THAT'S THE TICKET!
Marc Clifton wrote: Not to mention converting nice relational data to flat files so they can be SFTP'd to third party vendors that still use COBOL.
Oh dear Cthulhu, they do realize this isn't 1975 anymore, right?
System.ItDidntWorkException: Something didn't work as expected.
C# - How to debug code[ ^].
Seriously, go read these articles.
Dave Kreskowiak
|
|
|
|
|
I use the Gigabyte Brix PRo i7, 32GB RAM 2 1TB SSDs. It is mounted on the back of my monitor. have been using this for over 4 years, no complaints and do not see a need to upgrade (yet).
A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, navigate a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects! - Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|