|
Not something you can beam about now, but at some point the tine will be right.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
|
I hear he also likes the occasional Martini with Olive the other reindeer.
|
|
|
|
|
Buckshot LeFonque[^] is the only one that I know of 
"I'm neither for nor against, on the contrary." John Middle
|
|
|
|
|
|
No. It’s what happened to Dasher as they flew over Chicago last year. Or was it Detroit?
I'm pretty sure I would not like to live in a world in which I would never be offended.
I am absolutely certain I don't want to live in a world in which you would never be offended.
Freedom doesn't mean the absence of things you don't like.
Dave
|
|
|
|
|
I've been searching for options to stabilize videos for free.
I've noticed that the latest Google Photos app does this very well...
You simply load the video, touch the edit button and press stabilize... once you've done this you can simply save it.
Important note:
If you have your video file in the SDCard the app is not capable to save the video.
 
|
|
|
|
|
If you're not paying for it then you're the product. Your video is probably scanned for identifiable content so you can be bombarded with related adverts and that info then passed on to other companies.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes...
But anyway, in case you are interested, you can use Google Photos now to stabilize your videos.
Who knows what kind of adverts you'd receive!
|
|
|
|
|
Joan M wrote: Who knows what kind of adverts you'd receive!
Anti-Parkinson pills?
I'll get my coat...
"I'm neither for nor against, on the contrary." John Middle
|
|
|
|
|
Super LOL! 
But you must still get your coat...
|
|
|
|
|
I'm shaking with laughter.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
intense, not softened or dumbed down, well paced, a good adaptation.
Signature ready for installation. Please Reboot now.
|
|
|
|
|
Title was misleading though - no PC support in sight.
|
|
|
|
|
Have you been smoking weed and watching Teletubbies at the same time again? 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
I think it was the tubby custard[^] that got to him.
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
oh boy, I watched a lot of that as the kids were growing up.
worst thing is while they've mostly forgotten it, I haven't.
damn, now got that tune stick in head... all together now:
Stinky Pinky, Dip Sh*t, Loo Loo, and Poo,
Smelly Bubbies, Smelly Bubbies,
Will Eat You, Ehhh awww
Signature ready for installation. Please Reboot now.
|
|
|
|
|
Soooo... not The Hobbit, then?
|
|
|
|
|
bit too tall for a hobbit (except when it was Georgie)
Signature ready for installation. Please Reboot now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is printing that much of a security risk that users must, by default, not be allowed to print?
I don't want to click extra buttons, I just want to print!!
|
|
|
|
|
Yes.
I you don't believe me, then simply install a printer and give me access.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Eddy Vluggen wrote: Yes
There is no way to design a secure method that allows the end user to print right away?
I don't believe this. So the rest of our lives, we will always need to be unable to print a document right away? We must click an extra button?
|
|
|
|
|
Well ... do you remember faxes?
You'd get to work in the morning, and wade through the half a fax roll of spam that had arrived overnight. And that was when the fax sender had to pay for it.
If the default for printing was "open" then there'd be a load of wasted paper, ink, and toner; and people would be swearing at MS for allowing it...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: You'd get to work in the morning, and wade through the half a fax roll of spam that had arrived overnight. And that was when the fax sender had to pay for it.
that thermal paper wasn't cheap either, so the receiver paid too...
overnight the roll would too often run out (spammers using cheaper night time call rates) and the one fax you were waiting for [from the other side of the world] was lost - so you'd also pay to send a fax back to the client (as it's now their night time) asking them to re-send their fax...
Signature ready for installation. Please Reboot now.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
