|
Le plume de ma tante est sur le bureau de mon oncle.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
![Rose | [Rose]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif) [^]
«One day it will have to be officially admitted that what we have christened reality is an even greater illusion than the world of dreams.» Salvador Dali
|
|
|
|
|
Vamos a la playa 
|
|
|
|
|
OH, OH, OH, OH, OH! 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.
Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
I translated your text with Google translate and found out that it is about an UDEMY course "WPF e XAML em PORTUGUÊS".
I think the problem that you have no subscribers is caused by the fact that it is written in portuguese which narrows down the audience, so I would advise to translate it into English.
But it may also be a question of time before you get subscribers, as your course is quite new.
|
|
|
|
|
The problem is that in english there was too many versions of the same course and the brazilian community in udemy is quite large. thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, forgot about the Brazilians, they are not to be underestimated indeed
|
|
|
|
|
So in my Rolex lexer reboot, I'm potentially adding a way to specify lexer rules using eXtensible Backus-Noir Form instead of regex (although you can also use regex)
My parsers already allow for this. But I'm thinking of including this feature in my lexer directly.
This creates a strange problem for me, wherein as soon as I add this feature my lexer documents fit the exact same format as my parser documents.
XBNF format.
So what?
Well, the what is that if you pass the same document to a parser that you pass to the lexer you'll get different results, and you shouldn't. You should get just the terminals rendered by the lexer generator. That way the parser can work with the lexer from the same spec document.
But if i pass one of these documents to my lexer, it will treat all of the elements as terminals! why would it not?
My options are to make a new file format specifically to distinguish between this one and XBNF, or to make Rolex only render parts of the XBNF document - the terminal parts. It's kind of counterintuitive that last bit, but it's the Right(TM) result.
*sigh*
Fortunately with the last option if you only use regex in it, none of the above matters. But if you start using BNF in it, it will get confused as to what's a terminal and what's not, forcing you to mark every terminal declaration with the terminal attribute.
I don't like that.
I might make a command line option to either force the document to be a lexer document, or to force it to be treated as a parser document.
This is confusing even to explain. There has to be a better way.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
BNF is a (data)normalization issue; how does this apply to lexers?
It has nothing to do with a regex. Thread carefully before you explain.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Backus Naur form is a format for describing textual data formats.
[ Optional ]
{ Repeat }
Alternation1 | Alternation2
(there are many variations)
Backus–Naur form - Wikipedia[^]
You can describe lexible expressions using it.
For example
Digit = "0"|"1"|"2"|"3"|"4"|"5"|"6"|"7"|"8"|"9"
Letter = "A"|"B"...
Although that sucks which is why i let you intermingle regex
Digit = '[0-9]'
Letter = '[A-Za-z]'
and then you can declare
LetterOrDigit = Letter | Digit
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: Backus Naur form is a format for describing textual data formats.
I was preparing to take away a fiber from your thread.
Boyce–Codd normal form - Wikipedia[^].
In regexes, you rule, my Queen.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Eddy Vluggen wrote: In regexes, you rule, my Queen.
There is no truth to the rumor that I am Queen of the Lizard People.
*eats a bug*
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
Give my regards to Nakor 
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Eddie, HTC,
BNF has a much wider, fascinating, usage in the history of modern logic, and, computer science: [^] Quote: The origin of BNF is not as important as its impact on programming language development. During the period immediately following the publication of the ALGOL 60 report BNF was the basis of many compiler-compiler systems. Some directly used BNF like "A Syntax Directed Compiler for ALGOL 60" developed by Edgar T. Irons and "A Compiler Building System" Developed by Brooker and Morris. Others changed it to a programming language. The Schorre Metacompilers made it a programming language with only a few changes. <class name=""> became symbol identifiers dropping the enclosing <,> and using quoted strings for symbols of the target language. Arithmetic like grouping provided simplification that removed using classes where grouping was its only value. The META II arithmetic expression rule shows grouping use. Output expressions placed in a META II rule are used to output code and labels in an assembly language. Rules in META II are equivalent to a class definitions in BNF. The Unix utility yacc is based on BNF with code production similar to META II. yacc is most commonly used as a parser generator, and its roots are obviously BNF. BNF today is one of the oldest computer-related languages still in use.
The way Panini nailed it some 2500+ years ago [^] fascinates me ... if i had another life, I'd study Sanskrit grammar.
«One day it will have to be officially admitted that what we have christened reality is an even greater illusion than the world of dreams.» Salvador Dali
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: eXtensible Backus-Noir
This is a wonderful malapropism; I hope it was intentional !
imho, trying to make "one ring that rules them all" is generally a mistake ... unless you want to play Sargon.
cheers, Bill
«One day it will have to be officially admitted that what we have christened reality is an even greater illusion than the world of dreams.» Salvador Dali
|
|
|
|
|
If you mean Backus-Noir vs Backus-Naur it was my fingers getting the better of me.
They type phonetically when I don't mind them.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
I'm a fan of Bacchus-Noir 
«One day it will have to be officially admitted that what we have christened reality is an even greater illusion than the world of dreams.» Salvador Dali
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: phonetically
and, when the fingers don't know French.
«One day it will have to be officially admitted that what we have christened reality is an even greater illusion than the world of dreams.» Salvador Dali
|
|
|
|
|
These fingers make a point to not know French.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: These fingers make a point to not know French.
Touché !
«One day it will have to be officially admitted that what we have christened reality is an even greater illusion than the world of dreams.» Salvador Dali
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've been coding some dark stuff lately. Do you know how challenging it can be to enumerate orcs?
They are remarkably uncooperative.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
For Group #1; those who...
- Currently have a YouTube Channel
- Started it on your own
- Cared and nurtured it single-handed
- Are actively and regularly engaged with it today
Your Question Is: What do you wish you had known before you started your YouTube channel ?
For Group #2, those who...
- Had a YouTube Channel in the past
- Started it on your own
- Were the only one responsible for it
- No longer have it
- You had a bad experience with it
Your Question Is: Name the #1 negative factor which caused it to be bad, and the #1 Positive factor which was missing.
For Group #3, those who...
- Do not have a YouTube channel
- Have a video channel on some other site
- It has been totally yours, i.e., Conception, Maintenance, etc.
Your Question Is: What led you to your decision ?
For Group #4, those who...
- Don't have any regular internet video channel at all
- Do have an internet video presence via some alternative venue
Your Question Is: What advantages does this give you over using the commercial site ?
For Group #5, those who...
- Have no internet video channel,
- But you do use YouTube And/Or other video sites as a viewer
Your Question Is: What are the two best and two worst things about the channels and the video clips you've seen ?
For Group #6, those who...
- Just say no to internet video; Of any kind / From any source / Via any site
Your Question Is: What keeps you away from internet video ?
|
|
|
|
|
Answer #6
They have to remain KSS.
|
|
|
|
|
Group 7; TL;DR.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
