|
it sounds to me a datetime picker should capture the mouse, and "exit" when a day gets clicked (value updated) or a cancel widget gets clicked (value not updated). That way you can't inadvertently walk away from it.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, improve readability, and make me actually look at the code.
|
|
|
|
|
Did you pick a date beyond 2012? That is not supported.
|
|
|
|
|
Can you please remind me to update the code to reflect that?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
This[^] guy's spamming multiple boards.
|
|
|
|
|
Cleanup in aisle 4.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
It seemed like I stopped getting the points for the downloads - the downloads number increases but not the points.
Nick Polyak
|
|
|
|
|
I'm seeing a bunch for you:
12 May 2011 1:34 PM Source code or demo file downloaded
12 May 2011 2:22 PM Source code or demo file downloaded
10 May 2011 1:20 PM Source code or demo file downloaded
12 May 2011 6:31 AM Source code or demo file downloaded
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
then they are not in the chronological order for some reason within "reputation history". At least I do not see the one from 1:34 today?
Also based on what I see the increase in total points was, I got some points for bookmarks and upvoting, but not for the downloads.
Something seems to have gotten wrong after the update.
Thanks
Nick Polyak
|
|
|
|
|
We're looking into it.
[Edit: We have made changes so that you only get rewarded for the first download by each user, and also so you don't get rewarded for downloading your own files. Does that help solve part of the mystery? Still working on the ordering.]
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
modified on Thursday, May 12, 2011 3:59 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Preventing the duplicates is good, but I suspect that at least some of the downloads were perfectly new downloads - by people who upvoted or bookmarked my articles.
For your information I downloaded my own articles only a couple of times since downloading started bringing extra points and that was only to test the feature. Yesterday I downloaded it once. My downloads count increased at least by 10 since the day before yesterday, but I have not got a single point for it.
Also if they are all duplicates why would they be reported in the "Reputation History" as something that gives me points?
Thanks
Nick Polyak
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: We have made changes so that you only get rewarded for the first download by each user
That does not honors a valuable update.
[Edit]Only one download per version should be counted.[/Edit]
Chris Maunder wrote: and also so you don't get rewarded for downloading your own files
Good.
|
|
|
|
|
If you upload a new file, or rename your current file to have a new name based on the version then you will get new points for that, but we need to draw a line somewhere and try as much as possible to prevent abuse or spurious points. It's not perfect, we agree, but with the multiple ways in which the community can reward authors - voting, bookmarking, downloading - plus the points for the article itself, we think the system is fair and rewarding.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
If you gave points / version / download, then DanG would overtake CG...
Panic, Chaos, Destruction.
My work here is done.
or "Drink. Get drunk. Fall over." - P O'H
OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often *students*, for heaven's sake. -- (Terry Pratchett, alt.fan.pratchett)
|
|
|
|
|
you and Chris may well be in a different timezone, the rep history page uses local times (but not the user's datetime formatting preferences!).
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, improve readability, and make me actually look at the code.
|
|
|
|
|
The time zone difference cannot expain why the items from 2 days ago appear between today's items. (Max difference can be 1 day)
Thanks
Nick Polyak
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Nick Polyak,
You were right, there was a bug in ordering. It is fixed now.
Thanks for pointing it to us.
Sincerely,
Elina
Life is great!!!
Enjoy every moment of it! 
|
|
|
|
|
I observed that, my technical blog feeds were not fetched for last two days though I have added the rel tag. The blog feed[^] also shows those 2 posts but in the CP home page they are not present for edit/moderation. I noticed that it takes a huge time sometimes. Is it something because of CP servers are too busy?
CP admins and moderators, please look into the issue and take some action to fetch them on time. Appreciate your quick help.
Regards - Kunal Chowdhury | Microsoft MVP (Silverlight) | CodeProject MVP | Software Engineer
|
|
|
|
|
I've just moved the service that handles this to a new server so it should kick in soon.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, it's now available. 
Regards - Kunal Chowdhury | Microsoft MVP (Silverlight) | CodeProject MVP | Software Engineer
|
|
|
|
|
My opinion:
I was observing the rep points given for the attachment download and it looks to me that 5 points are just a little too many. I found, few instances when all my articles attachment were downloaded around same time (really hard to accept normal!). Further, based on the comparison on other rep points being awarded, 5 is high.
I would suggest it to be around 2 points to Author (instead of 5) & 1 points to member downloading it (instead of 2).
Thoughts?
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, 5 is way too many and will be changed.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I don't really agree with others saying 5 points for a download is too much. IMO downloading something is more of a commitment or appreciation than bookmarking something; it indicates I'm willing to spend time, disk space (at least temporarily), and probably am going to look into the code (more extensively than possible through the nice "Browse Code" facilities) and maybe also run it. Compared to bookmarking, 5 for a download isn't enough (actually it is bookmarking that is way too high).
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, improve readability, and make me actually look at the code.
|
|
|
|
|
As the person who stands to gain the most, I personally feel that downloads provide too many points. Besides, a download is just a very easy click that doesn't take much thinking about. If possible I would prefer to award 5 points for downloading, opening and then viewing the source code.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
You've lost me completely here.
Chris Maunder wrote: a download is just a very easy click that doesn't take much thinking about
and bookmarking takes a huge effort and a long time? 
Chris Maunder wrote: If possible I would prefer to award 5 points for downloading, opening and then viewing the source code.
do you expect people to start a download, wait, spend the bandwidth and monthly ISP volume, and then typically not open and view what they got?
According to the current FAQ I can bookmark one of your articles and download its code, giving me 2+2 Org points and you 5+5 Author points.
Which action is the bigger and more significant one, downloading or bookmarking? For me the answer clearly is: downloading.
Also, in one minute I could browse to 10 articles (not read them!), just bookmark them; I wouldn't be able to download their ZIP files in that short a period.
IMO downloading should be worth a multiple of bookmarking, say three times more, and that to both parties involved.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, improve readability, and make me actually look at the code.
|
|
|
|
|
The download links are front and centre and are clicked far more often, and I would also say clicked just to see what it is. The bookmark link is not as obvious as the links glaring at you from the top of the article, and I would argue are only clicked when someone feels the article is worth more than just a casual "what's this". I never said "huge" effort. I do maintain that bookmarking an article is a more conscious effort and less of a "why not - I'm here, I may as well" effort.
There are 5.2 times as many downloads as bookmarks in case you're wondering about the relative frequency.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
