|
|
For some time, there are some issues with voting and sorting answers in Quick Answers:
- When voting, the vote is cast, but the stars are not immediately updated. I think this has already been reported some time ago.
- Accepted answers are not longer shown on top. They are just sorted like if they are normal answers.
[Edit] Answers with one star are shown on top now, but they should be shown on bottom.
The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
modified 26-Jun-14 2:17am.
|
|
|
|
|
In the list of questions in Quick Answers, the links to the questions have an ?arn=N query string, where N is the position of the question in the list.
What's goal of this? If it doesn't have a goal, can it please be removed? It is rather annoying for me because if the position of a question that I have visited changes, my browser doesn't longer count it as "visited" and doesn't longer highlight it in purple (visited-link color), but in blue.
The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
Now you solved me the mystery of why Chrome clear visited info every few minutes...
I searched for a Chrome problem all the time and didn't noticed the change in the url!
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
That's from the Prev/Next links on Quick Answers. The Prev/Next depend on your current list settings. We should just store that in session...
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
If an article gets 5 Approve/Report votes, an article is approved/closed immediately. But this is not the case for "Needs help" reports: an article stays in the queue even after 5 of these reports. So an article with 15 Needs help reports and 5 Approve votes will still get approved, while it actually is not yet ready.
I suggest the following: if an article reaches 5 Needs help reports, remove it from the queue and send it to the Editors/Subeditors. Also put a message to the author on the top of the article, like this:
Quote: Your article has been sent to the Editors because [reason here]. Your article will be published soon after the Editors fixed the problems.
The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
Excellent..
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
|
Have you reported an answer to that question, and did this report remove it? If that's the case, then it also shows your name as the latest updater.
The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
Possible - I removed some spam answers this morning.
A quick rep check and yes, I did report and manually delete a spam answer.
Explans that, then!
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
You deleted a spam answer to the question and therefore updated the Q&A thread.
I reported a similar issue some time ago when my name was shown as last updater after an answer was deleted when applying the final spam report kick.
|
|
|
|
|
there was a link in a recent newsletter to selected html/css articles from the recent competition. i just made a mental note that it was at www.codeproject.com/learn/[something]
coming here i could not find a link to that area anywhere. have i missed it? if it's here i don't think it's obvious. may be something to look at.
(i found the trashed newsletter and the link is, http://www.codeproject.com/Learn/html/[^])
|
|
|
|
|
Go to Homepage and click on the HTML5/CSS3 image.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
i don't see that anywhere either.
edit: looks like i got an old page somehow. i see it now.
|
|
|
|
|
Expanding active decision-making: The power of integrating business rules and events
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you kindly for the report. We will look into it.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
I'm trying to download the flash cards, but I keep on getting the message: "Unable sign you up and sign you in. Please confirm you have read and accepted the site's Terms of Service."
I've checked my settings and everything seems to be ok. Terms is checked.
|
|
|
|
|
I went there and can't even see a 'terms' check-box...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
modified 24-Jun-14 12:58pm.
|
|
|
|
|
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, but for someone want to download the PDF it can be a bit problematic to check something not there...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
There is no checkbox on that page, I know.
I was referring to the check in "My Settings".
|
|
|
|
|
It has been fixed - enjoy!
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
Just started getting this. Did NOT sign up for it. Have tried to unsubscribe at least 3 times and yet continue to get it.
I enjoy the Daily News article, that one I did sign up for. I consider this SPAM and don't appreciate:
1) Being auto-signed up for it just because I get the Daily News
2) The unsub function not working.
Fix your sh*t. Please.
|
|
|
|
|
Please send me the next copy of the Daily Build that you receive. You're not subscribed to it so you shouldn't be getting it.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I haven't fully thought this through, but I though I'd just throw this out there... 
<context>I've heard a bit of talk lately about "decreasing quality of articles" and surprise over the fact that some "articles" get through, when they are clearly tips, if even that.</context>
Anyway, at the moment each pending item has a "unpublished version only" forum attached to it where we are supposed to be commenting about the articles, but I don't see these forums being used much.
What if we had a single, permanent, mods-rep-only forum where we could discuss pending items? 
Sometimes we don't want the author of the pending item to see what we are saying about his article - for example, it gets a bit awkward when prominent mods publicly disagree in front of the author...
Also, such a forum might encourage more consistent approval/disapproval of pending items, as then there would be only one place to go to discuss pending items, not heaps and heaps of item-specific forums that disappear once the "invisible verdict" is given for each one.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
