|
Great. Such things happened on CodeProject several times. Sometimes, when some person started to respond aggressively, it turns out to be possible to convince him that no one wished anything bad for such person and everything was told to help him. Everyone deserves a chance to check oneself and fix some mistakes.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So, you think that giving a poster a solution that is not a solution is the correct thing to do? Of course you do. What was the point of someone saying that the correct solution is to rewrite the application? Seriously, how did this add anything? How does this make CodeProject a place that someone would want to come and visit again? How did that actually answer the question that had been asked?
Rewriting a project that works only because there's a newer and shinier framework available is not always a sensible idea and to present it without understanding the reasons and motivations behind the posters having to use the tooling they have is simplistic, naive and shows no understanding of commercial realities. Rewrites cost money. Generally they cost a lot of money. They are also incredibly risky enterprises because you are, after all, creating a completely new application - with the complication that users have an expectation that the new version must do everything that the old version can do. Certainly, if the original language was no longer available or could no longer run, then you would have no choice, but as the language is still alive and kicking, it's pure snobbery to suggest that it has to be thrown aside.
|
|
|
|
|
I partially agree with you.
I have been by customers that have 30 years old PLC-controllers. You can not buy the software in any shop (only from privates), you can not buy any hardware of that serie anymore at any shop (only from privates), but they are still with the opinion "it works and my maintenance men are used to it"
When something stops working and they don't find replacement quick... the full production will be idle.
Conclusion: They still don't want to hear about the new techs and I have to invest 500% more time (minimum) to make the same I would do with the currently standard versions
I would get pissed off as well, if in this situation I ask something and I get the answer, you have to rewrite everything.
- The difference is: One can always say: "I can't: Customer rules and they want it like that, impossible to rewrite" or something similar, keeping low profile and good manners.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: The difference is: One can always say: "I can't: Customer rules and they want it like that, impossible to rewrite" or something similar, keeping low profile and good manners.
You were absolutely spot on! I really appreciate it!
|
|
|
|
|
Pete,
This is all the matter of opinion, and the matter of discussion of the quality of a comment and so on. You could have written it all on the page of the question. Commercial reality and other real-life circumstances. Snobbery and all the sins you may intend to find. Anything can be discussed and criticized. It's a matter of opinions. But you are discussing it on the page of abuse report, where we discuss rudeness and aggressive behavior.
I think you, being correct and polite yourself, follow the thinking of some our rude inquirers: thinking that some people are more free than others. They rudely tells us that out comments are negative; and they only needs help; so, if you don't have a solution for me, don't comment, leave. If is repeated from time to time. That is, they have a right to say really bad words (sometimes), but people who write correct but negative comment did not have that right.
In your case, you are comparing diplomatic negotiations with war, saying that diplomatic suggestion was offensive, so the was is an adequate response. How about some thinking at this controversy? 
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
I think we should be graceful on this one - He seems to be stressed, and maybe your opinion was the little drop which made the pipe burst.
It's legacy code, and after all he has posted a well-formed question...
I will never again mention that Dalek Dave was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel.
How to ask a question
|
|
|
|
|
I never claimed that He posted not well-framed question
Even if pipe is full, it shouldn't burst. There's no excuse for such of behaviour.
Thank you for your opinion, Marco.
|
|
|
|
|
Maciej Los wrote: There's no excuse for such of behaviour.
Of course not, and I don't want to state that his outburst can be justified - People behave differently under stress, and sometimes we need to step back take a big breath - And in comparison to other offenses on the site that was a minor incident, we should give him a second chance.
I will never again mention that Dalek Dave was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel.
How to ask a question
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, i did it
|
|
|
|
|
Marco Bertschi wrote: we should give him a second chance
and this was his last one...
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
|
This Dude[^] (Click the link in his Bio)
I know that links to a personal homepage are allowed, but his personal homepage looks a lot like the Apple Website...
I will never again mention that Dalek Dave was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel.
How to ask a question
|
|
|
|
|
Um...I see nothing there: the only link is to his membership on CP - i.e. back where I came from...
In other news: OriginalGriff is as blind as a bat... 
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
First the fingers, now the eye sight... We are gonna give you a bigger keyboard, and maybe the NASA can spare you Hubble once it is out of service 
I will never again mention that Dalek Dave was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel.
How to ask a question
|
|
|
|
|
At this rate, I'm gonna need it... 
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: In other news: OriginalGriff is as blind as a bat.
Ha! I missed it too.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Marco Bertschi wrote: looks a lot like the Apple Website...
Enough so you may want to report this to Apple.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Don't be silly - they'll sue Marco for looking at it...
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
Ya, I just got notice in my email from Apple lawyers. They waste no time.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
It possibly is a phishing site. Likely isn't, but it could be.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
|
|
|
|
|
So... what the end veredict?
Spammer or not spammer?
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I'd go for Spammer.
It's suspicious that he included parts of the Apple website and then replaced bits of it by his own stuff...
I will never again mention that Dalek Dave was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel.
How to ask a question
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
