|
Writing a comment e.g. in Q/A and press "Submit": It does not Show the comment after "Submit"... leads to reposting also from other expririenced users 
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
We were doing updates at around the time you reported this, so some comments may have failed for a brief time.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
... and shown correct after refresh page, only for Information
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
See above. (and thanks for the report)
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for rply. Nope the issue is older than one year and not related to "above". Sorry for that 
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
In this question C# division by zero for doubles - comvisible - infinity vs. Dividebyzeroexception[^]I entered the title
C# division by zero for doubles - COMVisible - Infinity vs. DivideByZeroException
which will be shown as
C# division by zero for doubles - comvisible - infinity vs. Dividebyzeroexception
Not a big thing, but I think caps should not be adjusted automatically/randomly...
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I was pretty sure I posted a "Pointless" response to the survey, not the one that is there. Was it removed or did I have a senior moment and didn't actually post it.
It was along the lines of an honest person would not but a dishonest person would lie in the survey so the question is pointless.
BTW the above observation also invalidates @ChrisMaunders observation of the morals of the members.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Are you accusing our survey of not being the pinnacle of scientific rigour?!
As to the señor moment, I can't comment.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
...both by the same member: Member 13409396 - Professional Profile[^]
(The answer was to his own question).
The reason I deleted it was it was somehow causing an automatic redirect to an invalid home page and bookmarking something, and while I managed to kill the question redirect with ESC and editing, I couldn't do anything with the answer.
I don't think it was malicious - it seemed to be "normal" PHP code - but I couldn't get messages to him (no buttons) and it's his only posts to the site. Could someone have a quiet word and explain about code blocks and why his question was deleted?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Or better yet, fix the XSS bug that lets a QA post execute code. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
My email is confirmed but not updated in my settings and also can not sign in with the confirmed email please solve this bug(if any)
|
|
|
|
|
If you can't sign in, how did you post this?
Are you saying that you are trying to change your email and the new one confirms OK but doesn't "take" so the old email works and the new one doesn't? Or is this on a separate account?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trying to report this spam message[^], but it doesn't have the "report" flag.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
It seems to be very common that articles/blogs/tips with obvious problems with formatting, image locations, content etc. get approved. Latest example Step by Step CRUD Operation using Web API2 & MVC 6
Just a question, if the reports for an article (while in moderation) are not weighed, should they be? Could this help so that incomplete articles would not get approved too easily?
|
|
|
|
|
I accidentally double-clicked the Post Message button (here)[^]. In days gone by, I'd get an error that it was already posted. This time, no error message and it counted twice for points (Yipee!). Only actually posted once.
<pre-planned edit>
Worked even better for this post - got credited 3x.
</pre-planned edit>
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Don't worry. I double-clicked SPAM so that should balance your points out.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 12-Sep-17 9:42am.
|
|
|
|
|
In Main.min.css...
You're setting contrast1-border twice. I think you wanted to set contrast2-border instead.
It's near the top of the file, after the place where you set theme 1, 2 and 3.
Also, the font size for <h1> and <h2> are the same at 29, while <h3> is 19. Seems to me <h2> should be 24. In point of fact, The font sizes should probably be percentages of the body's font size. I was playing around and determined that if you left the font size at 14, you could start at 200% for h1, and go down 20% for each subsequently smaller header.
Finally, the font-weights for headers in articles would (I think) look better if they were set to 400.
Can we override styles in articles?
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
modified 11-Sep-17 14:54pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your 'solutions' are voted down for a reason you don't understand (really?). Somebody else votes up all those answers for a reason I don't understand. You post a gripe here suggesting some kind of abuse is occurring. The Q&A seems to be operating normally.
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
Bulk down votes (any down vote to 1) without any comments are not ok from my point of view, that's
why I voted up for some of his down voted answers.
BTW: I also don't like the standard answers, and gave him then and when a low vote. But any time I did this, I wrote a comment showing that it was me and explained why.
Furhtermore I see a big improvment that he explains the problem or give some hints first, before the standard answer follows.
Only my 1 cent
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
0x01AA wrote: without any comments are not ok from my point of view
We all have our own point of view but it is possible the votes are a genuine attempt to send a message without entering into further argument. The reason for the vote down is probably quite clear. Anonymous voting is still a good system in my opinion.
What is unfortunate is when a question is a poor question but still receives an answer that is completely generic and only qualifies as comment. When that answer gets voted up with a comment added "+5" then I like many others feel things are headed in the direction of a small group of people who are regulars in Q&A and not in the direction of quality.
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you Peter Wasser for your Feedback.
1.) I come to a Limit to discuss this, because of my limited English.
2.) It comes now more to a philosophical discussion which I think is not the purpose here
Bruno
[Edit]
Anyway the anonymous down voter is far away to be fair
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
