|
This is in reference to this post[^].
The answer given by the first answerer[^] was completely wrong. So I 1-voted it and provided a reason there.
I also gave an answer to the question, which I feel, was a possible solution to the question.
The answerer comes back and down-vote me with an invalid reason.
Chris, I posted a reply to one of your post about removing my vote of 1 few days back. Here[^].
This is one of the example that I was talking about.
Edit: Modified the subject.
..Go Green..
modified on Thursday, September 16, 2010 11:59 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Hey Ankur, I upvoted you for the sake of Justice.
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC League Table Link
CCC Link[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks DD.
But it's not about up voting or down-voting an answer. It's about the reason behind it.
I could have down-voted without giving any reason. And he would have probably never known about it.
It's like, since I voted your answer down, you come back to take a revenge and down-vote the correct answer as well.
He could have had a discussion with me and justified his point. And I could have re-considered my vote.
Moreover he modified his comments after I wrote this post.
..Go Green..
|
|
|
|
|
Sadly you are expecting sense and rationality in an environment where the only form of retaliation is the 1 vote. Now, if you could deliver a slap down the wire, it would lead to much different behaviour.
|
|
|
|
|
I am sorry but I was pissed when I saw his reply. May be because I was not in the best of my mood. 
I expected a justification.
And this is not the first time he has done such thing. He used to answer questions that were about a week or two old with nothing substantial to add.
I had the same old him in my mind.
Moreover I did a test of the answer before down-voting him.
Anyways, I got to move on! 
..Go Green..
|
|
|
|
|
Hiren has clarified his reply - and it seems to me it's a reasonable answer.
|
|
|
|
|
He has modified his comment. It was not the same when he voted.
..Go Green..
|
|
|
|
|
That's alright. Now that he has changed his post, perhaps you could re-vote? A 1 seems harsh. His reply seems to be the most probable solution.
|
|
|
|
|
That's what I meant by providing a comment there. I expected a better reply from him, a justification to his answer. But his reply was very harsh.
I did a test on my local machine.
FileUpload.PostedFile.FileName and FileUpload.FileName gave me a same value. I will test it on a server and reconsider my vote for sure.
..Go Green..
|
|
|
|
|
Okay, my point was that his original post didn't seem to deserve a 1 vote. Maybe that pissed him off.
|
|
|
|
|
That's why we have an option to re-vote.
He could have justified the answer and asked me to reconsider my vote.
Voting an answer down just because someone has voted his answer down doesn't make sense to me.
..Go Green..
|
|
|
|
|
Ankurm/ wrote: Voting an answer down just because someone has voted his answer down doesn't make sense to me.
Well he voted your post down with a comment too, right? That's the same thing you did too. (unless he edited what was originally a ruder comment). Because what I see now may be inaccurate but not rude.
|
|
|
|
|
This post would have not been there if he would have provided a valuable comment.
..Go Green..
|
|
|
|
|
Ankurm/ wrote: This post would have not been there if he would have provided a valuable comment.
Okay, I don't really see what's wrong here. You voted him down because you thought his answer's wrong. He did the same back to you, and clarified his answer better. You then started this thread here to complain about it. But to others (like me) who viewed both your answers, and both your comments, it doesn't particularly seem as if he was particularly rude to you. That's what I see here.
Once again I only see the modified comments. So I don't know if there were harsher words exchanged originally that have since been edited.
|
|
|
|
|
Nishant Sivakumar wrote: He did the same back to you, and clarified his answer better.
No he didn't do that. He voted me down and after sometime he put a comment saying my answer has nothing to do with the question (I don't remember the exact words, but he meant that).
Anyways, finish this post now. Since he has modified his comments, everything seems okay now.
..Go Green..
|
|
|
|
|
Harsh mate, harsh. Have a 5 to compensate for whichever moron univoted this again.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: Have a 5 to compensate for whichever moron univoted this again.
Wow - I didn't think someone'd give me a 1 vote there
Thanks Pete.
|
|
|
|
|
My pleasure mate. Glad to help.
|
|
|
|
|
Not me Nish.
I am justifying because I seem to be the most probable person who could down vote you here.
..Go Green..
|
|
|
|
|
Ankurm/ wrote: Not me Nish.
Didn't think it'd be you anyway, so no worries. 
|
|
|
|
|
I tested his answer both on my local machine and server, the value for FileUpload.FileName and FileUpload.PostedFile.FileName is same.
I am using .net framework 3.5.
Server has Win Server 2008 and IIS7 installed.
..Go Green..
|
|
|
|
|
Please Test Again,
The Problem is regarding Asp.net(FYI),
The another person Called "virang" Have justified my answer After your Question,
Please Look Closely.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Hiren Solanki wrote: Please Test Again,
The results won't change by trying again.
Hiren Solanki wrote: The Problem is regarding Asp.net(FYI),
Oh, is it? I am so sorry, I don't see the tags. By the way, what do you think I was talking about? Classic ASP? Does it have FileUpload control??  
Hiren Solanki wrote: The another person Called "virang" Have justified my answer After your Question
Another person called Abhijit Jana, MVP, has justified my answer as well.
Hiren Solanki wrote: Please Look Closely
It's time for you to look closely.
..Go Green..
|
|
|
|
|
Ok Lets give this to our indian forum and see whats others have to say about this.
|
|
|
|
|
Moreover, I feel, a good design would be to not allow a web page to get the full path of a file on a client's computer. That would expose the directory structure and in some cases even the host name which a website doesn't need to know in any case.
I haven't read the documentation though.
..Go Green..
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
