|
No one is stopping you from creating a new account. Your old account was closed but you aren't physically blocked from CodeProject.
As I said earlier: "a lot seem to operate on the "I'll do the right thing only if I'm caught". That's simply not acceptable and we have zero tolerance for those who copy others' work and pass it off as their own."
Plagiarism is a huge problem. We gave second chances, and third chances, and in the end we spent an inordinate amount of time trying to reason with people who insisted "it wasn't my fault, this is so unfair, just give me a chance".
I'm sorry, but our decision is final. Feel free to create a new account if you wish, but if you do please re-read the first clause of the Contributors Agreement[^] that you agreed to when posting.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Member 12282694 wrote: eporting members is not a game
Indeed it isn't, which is a responsibility that the reporters take very seriously. Some people may need coaching but surely they shouldn't need coaching that they should not attempt to claim the work of others as their own. In a climate where litigation over copyright theft is very real, CP has to maintain a zero tolerance to plagiarism.Member 12282694 wrote: you have forgotten that the existence of code project website was : listening and helping members with poor capacity in writing and programming to be efficient.
Nope. Don't see your point here. CP has never existed to satisfy the ego of someone posting an article - and plagiarism is about satisfying the ego by making people think that you have written something you didn't.Member 12282694 wrote: because what I understood from his decision that : when a member sign up in code project, he should be a pro, we have no place for newbie to learn or to make mistakes.
We expect members to read the agreements they sign - when you submitted your article, you checked the box saying you understood the terms and conditions for posting an article. If you didn't bother to read them, then that is YOUR fault, not CPs.
Let's put this a slightly different way. How many articles do you think the moderators review? A reviewer may typically review 30 to 40 articles in moderation, a week. There are several hundred new articles posted daily so different moderators will see different articles. So, we have a situation where we have lots of articles being seen by lots of different people. How do you think we would keep track of people who broke the rules more than once? Who do you think would enforce this? Why should we have to complicate the lives of people who know how to read and understand the rules for the sake of people who are too lazy to look them up? You don't have to be a professional to do that.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fantastic!
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
What happens now:
1. in my settings I have both allow-private-e-mails and notity-by-e-mail-on-response disabled.
2. I post a message to a forum, like 'Algorithms
3. I enable notification by e-mail of responses to that post
4. the global settings are then changed ... both of them are now enabled
What should happen:
1. changing the privacy settings for one post should not change the global settings
thanks, Bill
«Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.» Benjamin Franklin
|
|
|
|
|
"should" or "I would prefer if it..."
We originally had it as you preferred it to be. However, we had complaints that "settings were not being persisted".
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Make it a checkbox maybe?
|
|
|
|
|
Jörgen Andersson wrote: Make it a checkbox maybe?
Should that checkbox' state be persisted? 
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Chris,
I'll vote for "should." To me it is almost axiomatic that a "local" activity should not override a setting made in a facility that governs "global" settings.
I think it's very inconvenient that, if your intent is to allow replies to one specific message, then, after that message is sent, you have go and click your way to your Account/Settings/Forums configuration panel settings to "get back to where you belong."
If there was some great "technical cost" to implementing/allowing "local over-ride," however, then the way things are is, of course, fine, and I will keep on living  But, it sounds like you had "local override" before; I am trying to imagine why that would seem "not right" to someone.
cheers, Bill
«Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.» Benjamin Franklin
|
|
|
|
|
BillWoodruff wrote: then, after that message is sent, you have go and click your way to your Account/Settings/Forums configuration panel settings to "get back to where you belong."
But you don't - you just change it next time you post a message and it's updated again.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
If you remember.
I'm with Bill on this.
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe instead of a checkbox either 3 radio buttons or a dropdown list with "don't allow email responses", "allow for this message", "allow for all messages".
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
Sascha Lefèvre wrote: either 3 radio buttons or a dropdown list with "don't allow email responses", "allow for this message", "allow for all messages".
The "go for baroque" solution !
«Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.» Benjamin Franklin
|
|
|
|
|
Any time!
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
If a neuron can store 4.7 bits [^], I am wondering how many neurons it would cost me to remember to reset the setting given the increasing frequency of loss of neurons and garbage collection being orchestrated by my undertakers/telomeres ?
Selective-inattention may explain the reluctance to simply look down and see what the setting is ? Perhaps the steel-visor I wear in my LeadMan suit needed to withstand the radiation while answering QA questions blocks my vision ?
Why do memories of forgetting where I parked my car in a mall, keep returning, as I think about this ?
«Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.» Benjamin Franklin
|
|
|
|
|
A workaround would be to post the message with the options un-ticked, then immediately edit the message and tick the options.
Last year, there was an issue where my settings were being regularly reset. I'd always forget to un-tick the "email" options, and I found out the hard way that changing the options when you edit a message doesn't affect your global settings. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
The analogy comes to mind of: I have locked my car; to open the doors, I first have to insert the key, turn it to 'lock, and, then, take out the key, insert it again, and turn the key to 'unlock.
That ain't DRY 
«Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.» Benjamin Franklin
|
|
|
|
|
This morning i tried to publish my series of tutorial (5 article) about Windows Azure which I spent more than one week to write them.
and i receive this email from Info@codeproject.com
Hi Omar Nasri,
Your account at CodeProject has been reported as The member is being abusive or is a troll 10 times and is now deactivated.
after it my account was blocked and i found this message :
Closed because the member is being abusive or is a troll. Reported by phil.o, Nelek, Sascha Lefèvre, Jochen Arndt, Richard MacCutchan, Mika Wendelius, OriginalGriff on Saturday, January 23, 2016 4:08am
please tell me how can i activate it again  ?
|
|
|
|
|
You can't.
We take plagiarism very seriously here, and more than one of your articles has come up as plagiarised, including some of the ones you posted this morning. As a result, the community decided to reject your articles, and close your account.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
The only think i forget to do is to put references. for my introduction chapters.
please can you help me to activate my account ?
I'm really interested to be an active member in code project website.
modified 23-Jan-16 10:53am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
i hope they will help me 
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 22-Jan-16 17:26pm.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
whyever 
