|
Chris Maunder wrote: I don't for a second think you're blind. Something about the UI made it a blind
spot for you.
I too missed it, so much so that I hadn't used the search facility since it changed for this reason.
As to why it is a blindspot, I think it is because the search boxes are on the far right of the screen, it is not therefore entirely natural to go looking on the far left of the screen for ways of refining the search.
|
|
|
|
|
Does this[^] make it easier?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: You've raised a big question, though: why did you miss it? I don't for a second
think you're blind. Something about the UI made it a blind spot for you.
Hi Chris,
Well, that's a much appreciated "best possible light" view of my perceptual deficit 
What is strange to me, now, is that I seem to have a memory of seeing the search-result list of hits on "Nokia" in Lounge posts without any UI on the left side. But, I am unable to replicate that: so, I have to conclude, that was a "false memory" !
The principle of Occam's Razor suggests the simplest hypothesis: I didn't see the UI because I wasn't expecting it. Perhaps was "habituated" to not associating the left side graphics with search ? Or, maybe, I was a bit "wired" at the time, and just didn't look carefully ? Another, more dubious, hypothesis: I am "habituated" to seeing UI sort control of search results in other forms, or in other areas of a web page ?
Perhaps you are aware of the famous experiment where the subjects were shown a video of a basketball game; their expectations were "primed" by the experimentrs so they were focused on looking for certain things: more than half of the viewers of the video had no recall of a woman dressed in a gorilla suit running around, at a certain point, in the video.
You can find a summary of several similar experiments, including the one I mentioned at:
Missing The Gorilla[^]
best, Bill
"Many : not conversant with mathematical studies, imagine that because it [the Analytical Engine] is to give results in numerical notation, its processes must consequently be arithmetical, numerical, rather than algebraical and analytical. This is an error. The engine can arrange and combine numerical quantities as if they were letters or any other general symbols; and it fact it might bring out its results in algebraical notation, were provisions made accordingly." Ada, Countess Lovelace, 1844
modified on Thursday, April 7, 2011 9:04 AM
|
|
|
|
|
I always love the Gorilla video.
However, in our case I think your memory is fine. What's happened is we've switched out our old, clunky search and replaced it with a completely new search that has more options than the old. These new options are presented in the left hand column instead of being hidden under a "Advanced search" slide-out panel.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
After doing your search, look at the left hand side there is the search options orange panel, within it there is a sort by field, with 4 Date options and some others.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, Dave,
Please see my response above to Chris M., for self-flagellating response.
best, Bill
"Many : not conversant with mathematical studies, imagine that because it [the Analytical Engine] is to give results in numerical notation, its processes must consequently be arithmetical, numerical, rather than algebraical and analytical. This is an error. The engine can arrange and combine numerical quantities as if they were letters or any other general symbols; and it fact it might bring out its results in algebraical notation, were provisions made accordingly." Ada, Countess Lovelace, 1844
|
|
|
|
|
In question and answer,
chrome can not display "submit solution" button
--------------------------------------------
Now it works for me.?
Wander in Man-Made Wonder
modified on Monday, April 4, 2011 9:13 AM
|
|
|
|
|
It works for me. Chrome 10.0.648.204
Peter
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994.
|
|
|
|
|
And for me, same version - the latest.
Have you tried CTRL+F5 to do a full refresh?
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you as always. And it seems the message was community-nuked. Excellent!
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
It seems Aol says Google says I can't send you an article in a zip anymore?
The original message was received at Fri, 1 Apr 2011 22:02:26 -0400
from mtaomg-ma06.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.41.13]
*** ATTENTION ***
Your e-mail is being returned to you because there was a problem with its
delivery. The address which was undeliverable is listed in the section
labeled: "----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----".
The reason your mail is being returned to you is listed in the section
labeled: "----- Transcript of Session Follows -----".
The line beginning with "<<<" describes the specific reason your e-mail could
not be delivered. The next line contains a second error message which is a
general translation for other e-mail servers.
Please direct further questions regarding this message to the e-mail
administrator or Postmaster at that destination.
--AOL Postmaster
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<submit@codeproject.com>
(reason: 552-5.7.0 Our system detected an illegal attachment on your
message. Please)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to aspmx.l.google.com.:
>>> DATA
<<< 552-5.7.0 Our system detected an illegal attachment on your message. Please
<<< 552-5.7.0 visit http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=6590 to
<<< 552 5.7.0 review our attachment guidelines. l10si3361955vch.12
554 5.0.0 Service unavailable
|
|
|
|
|
yep, something like that was posted around here a week or so ago. the mail carrier rejects zips based on file extensions (EXE, maybe others too), something gmail has been doing for a long time too.
Suggestion: rename the offending extension (e.g. double it up), add a note CP should undo it before publishing.
Note: publishing/editing through the article wizard still works as usual, as that is just a file upload, no mail involved.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, improve readability, and make me actually look at the code.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, it's lame. You can't even go into super secret squirrel settings and say "just give me the zip!". It does accept rar files, though. Because they are sooo much more secure.
We setup the submission page at http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/Submit.aspx[^] to make things easier.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
It still worked as late as December 22.
But this will do, anything but the wizard. 
|
|
|
|
|
We've just started a full revamp of the wizard. A list of all the things you dislike would be incredibly valuable at this point.
We're planning on providing a HTML mockup to our most prolific authors (and anyone who wishes to put in their 2c) so can I assume you'd have a spare 2c?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
- Multi-file upload (so I can select a bunch of files at once, and click "upload" once).
- A "paste HTML" so I can just paste in my already formatted HTML without it being butchered afterward.
- When an image is uploaded, show the path I'd use when assigning the SRC of the IMG tag (you may already do this, it's been a while).
- A convenient of download of CSS and such we can use on our local to see what articles will look like before they're uploaded. Or maybe the LINK tag if you don't mind us remotely linking to the CSS.
- As part of the above download, perhaps include a masterpage so we can see the article in something that looks like CP's layout.
- I'd like to be able to edit articles after they have been approved by editors rather than have to send you an email. I think an editor botched one of my code snippets and I'd rather just edit my article really quick to fix it. The email approach is a pain (I have to wait until I get home and I have access to my email account, I have to look at the FAQ to look at proper procedures, and so on).
- When making edits, I'd like to have a box to type what I changed and then have the "list of changes" be created at the bottom of the article automatically by CP.
- Make all of the above as clear as possible and include it all on the same wizard page.
|
|
|
|
|
- Also, I'd like immediate feedback that my changes look ok. I haven't tried the new upload form, but I'm guessing it doesn't show all the changes immediately (a preview).
|
|
|
|
|
I think we can do something with that. Some notes:
1. We are always going to strip out formatting that will get in the way. Word markup, for instance, must die. We also format the pasted code. If there are specific instances where the submission wizard is screwing with HTML let us know and we'll slap[ it into shape.
2. Already there, and there's also an "insert" button.
3. The download template file[^] already has this.
> Also, I'd like immediate feedback that my changes look ok
Immediate meaning "not the preview button"? With regards to browser based WYSIWYG editors they are incredibly temperamental so, in some circumstances they are WYSIWYKG, where K = kinda.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
The template file has what? I don't see any linked CSS or a masterpage that would allow me to view my article on my local machine as it would on Code Project.
By immediate, I just mean "I can click preview and I'll see a preview". As in, I don't like emailing articles and waiting for an editor to get to it before I can see my changes look as I'd like. Not sure if it still works this way, but last I checked I had to email my article in after an editor gets a hold of my article.
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm. Interesting.
The template has been updated. No masterpage, but the CSS is linked.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
a) I've never used it.
b) I think it makes submitting an article far too easy. We haven't seen any "questions as articles" or "how does this work? articles" so I guess things have improved (significantly!) on your end, but I just feel that having articles go directly to an editor is preferable.
It also seems you've improved the approval process, so that's another good-onya. 
As with so many things, the hard way is the better way.
Just as long as you don't take the "beware of the leopard" route... 
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: beware of the leopard
I'd need a locked filing cabinet for that.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
But you can save on stairs and lights.
|
|
|
|
|
In New Search[^] page we can search things in (Articles, Technical Blogs, Tips & Tricks, Questions, Answers, Forum Messages, etc.,) but not comments because there is no option.
It will be another useful one if option to search text in comments. (Actually I have searched for a link(in comment by some one in Q/A section) I have seen few weeks back, that's why.)
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
