|
http://www.w3schools.com/html/
can this site help you?
|
|
|
|
|
Help in what way?!
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
It's gone once more...
@Chris-Maunder? Can you save me?!
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
modified 2-Jul-14 15:22pm.
|
|
|
|
|
If you mean email notifications of answers to QA solutions - I've just noticed that myself: didn't get a notification from a reply to a solution in QA[^] written yesterday...
GOTOs are a bit like wire coat hangers: they tend to breed in the darkness, such that where there once were few, eventually there are many, and the program's architecture collapses beneath them. (Fran Poretto)
|
|
|
|
|
Exactly. That bug happened a few week ago, but solved. Chris told that it was a cache issue. Now it is back and makes QA work a nightmare... More nightmare than usual I mean...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
To use when talking about spammers?
|
|
|
|
|
Member : http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/View.aspx?mid=10124981[^]
His account was reported being abuse [Large list of self accepted answers]. I think on request, Admins have reinstated it. Now, he is with us with same list of answers. Does this mean all his content is acceptable?
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
No it does not.
I've (quickly) gone through a number of his answers and can't see self-answered ones. Can you fire us a quick list of the offending ones?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
OK, he's gone.
I have no problem with someone posting a question, working on it, finding the answer, and then posting a "hey - I worked it out - here it is". However, this is a repeated, continuing pattern so no, not cool.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: I have no problem with someone posting a question, working on it, finding the answer, and then posting a "hey - I worked it out - here it is".
I agree, but I often see those kind of answers being downvoted. I think there was some talk about not giving the OP points for self-answering, but I don't know if that was actually implemented.
It can also be hard for us at times to determine if the OP posted an answer "too soon" after posting the question - sometimes there is no date/time displayed, just "yesterday" and we will have to go poking around in the revision lists to figure that out.
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
SoMad wrote: not giving the OP points for self-answering, but I don't know if that was actually implemented.
This will definitely resolve the issue as such Members are here only for rep hunting.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All,
Is there a widget or iframe way of sharing your Code Project reputation on other web sites (something akin to a wordpress widget) or similar?
Thanks,
|
|
|
|
|
There is: Tips and Tricks for CodeProject.com[^]
Example:
<iframe src="http://www.codeproject.com/members/flair/<memberID>" height="200" width="350" scrolling="no" frameborder="no"></iframe>
(Just replace <memberID> with your MemberID)
|
|
|
|
|
|
OP posted an article which should have been a Tip.
I proceeded to edit and change type to Tip and status Pending. On publishing there was an error (got the hamsters picture).
It appears that the OP had also gone in and edited to Tip and submitted again.
When I entered the revised article via the moderation queue, I was simply presented with a blank article and a message saying "this is an autosaved blah blah blah, do you want to discard or continue editing"
Now the bug......the discard was in normal font and did not appear as clickable like the continue editing link. However, out of curiosity I clicked the discard and it was still clickable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the article is Pending moderation then there will be two forums: 1 for the pending version and 1 forum that is for the published version.
Going back to that version after the article has been published should not allow posting to the version's forum, only the 'current' forum.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I can see in the notification that you posted a comment on the very same - old - version, however the post does not show up when seeing the article!
The user posted should not be able to bookmark an 'in-queue' version, so how he got there?!
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
Although the CP newsletter advertises the "Which email clients do you use?" poll, the home page continues to show last week's poll. Ctrl/F5'd, naturally. The problem occurs on Web01, Web02 and Web03.
The problem is also visible at http://www.codeproject.com/script/Surveys/List.aspx[^].
Edit: Just noticed the newsletter also includes a link to the old survey. 
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Not anymore
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
