|
Soapbox 1.0 is a private members forum. You, as you know are not a member of that fine "private members forum".
However, its only visibility to the outside world is "read only" for non-members, but that forum you would only find if you just happened to stumble over it (as in stubbing your toe) whilst hoovering behind the sofa. So really, there are not too many reasons for Site Protectors to moderate those messages destined for the private members forum at Soapbox 1.0, especially as the forum has its own Moderator / Administrator that can squash messages into oblivion, or to censor such messages if that is deemed appropriate.
As you will see from, other messages in this thread, I am still experiencing problems with the site. To me, CP appears to be messed-up and broken ...
Anyhow, thank you for being kind enough to explain what happened.
{fixed typo]
modified 10-Jun-15 15:56pm.
|
|
|
|
|
As the admin of that particular forum, SB1.0, I see no need to have outside moderation. If there is an issue with posting, I will deal with it appropriately. Is there a way to disable flagging for SB1.0 such that it doesn't enter the site moderation queue? This may be a question for Chris.
Gary Kirkham
Only in silence the word,
only in dark the light,
only in dying life:
bright the hawk's flight
on the empty sky.
|
|
|
|
|
Still not working. I'm not at all convinced that CP can get my old account back. It's a ..... disaster (to put it politely).
Anyhow, with this new account I have clicked SB1.0 Join Now button, so, you should get a request from me when you go into SB1.0 account. With MultiFox (a Firefox extension) I will periodically test if CP has managed to solve the problem without having to log out of this new account.
See you next door as and when ...
|
|
|
|
|
Your account was reactivated, however your password may have been nuked (I'm not sure).
Try requesting a new password.
Also, try CTRL-F5 in your browser and/or delete the browser cache.
Matthew
|
|
|
|
|
Well, it may well have been nuked.
I have tried every trick in the book. But no!
I did request a password reset earlier. but no email received from CP with temporary password, nothing received and nothing in the spam folder neither. But I will have another look [again] at ALL of my email accounts shortly. I will try to request a password reset again ...
NOW ...
http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/SendPassword.aspx?rp=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codeproject.com%2fLounge.aspx[^] gives me ...
[quote]
Unable to find your information. Can you please check the email or display name and try again? If in doubt refer to the original membership email that was sent to you when you joined.
Click here to return to your previous page.
[/quote]
In case you are confused, that is for the orinal account with my gmail.com login
modified 10-Jun-15 16:26pm.
|
|
|
|
|
try to login again. I think we checked the box to activate the account, but didn't click save.
My bad.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you Matthew.
Just tried, all seems OK now 
modified 1-Aug-19 21:02pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Personally, I'd be much happier never seeing that dreck.
|
|
|
|
|
Simple solution ...
If it is marked as destined for the PRIVATE MEMBERS FORUM of SoapBox1.0 then allow it easy unhindered progress. In that forum we discuss a whole variety of subject matter that is [usually] not relevant and not approppriate for ANY other forum in any other part of the CodeProject empire. And as it is a private members forum, what is discussed there is by definition - private - and should not never ever be moderated by those who have neither any interest in that forum or by those who are easily offended by either subject matter or by its contents, and those who are not actually members of that private members forum.
The private members forum has its own Administrator/Moderator. They ensure that general CodeProject rules are followed. They ensure that the content is not potentially an affront to Canadian Law, to the best of their understanding of Canadian Law. They are most able to squash into oblivion any posting or any whole or partial thread in its entirety and to censor any posting. They are also able to discipline any members in a variety of ways to ensure proper conduct. I should know, I was the Administrator/Moderator until I passed on the baton, by transparent and democratic election, to the present official.
Thank you
modified 1-Aug-19 21:02pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard A. Abbott wrote: PRIVATE MEMBERS FORUM
There is no such thing. Or certainly I would never see it.
|
|
|
|
|
We don't moderate private forums, Richard, we protect against SPAM.
Our spam detector was definitely out of sorts after the move but that has been rectified. the ferocity of the system's reaction to spam reports has also been turned down several notches, so far less chance that your account will be disabled (not nuked) should you post a message inadvertently marked as spam.
With respect to protecting forums, private or not, we have seen instances were seemingly innocent members have spammed, or their accounts compromised and spam posted. If we could definitively say that no members of a private forum will spam then our job would be easier, but that's not an assumption I'm willing to make.
You wrote "If CP does manage to resolve the problems - yes - problems as in many, let me know. I'm not at all convinced that CP will be able to rectify these issues"
Can I assume at this point that your issues are now fixed?
Anything else broken or is everything working to your satisfaction at this point?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris,
At this moment in time, the old account is working so the new account can indeed be removed. It was only ever to be temporary.
Regarding the spam filter, occasionally messages still gets stuck in the queue. I wonder if the SoapBox1.0 destined messages can be allowed to skip that anti-spam check. I'm sure that anything posted into the Soapbox1.0 forum that shouldn't be there will be squashed into non-existence by the SB1.0 Admin/Moderator.
Chris Maunder wrote: Anything else broken or is everything working to your satisfaction at this point?
So far so good. However ... Regarding the members of SB1.0, it is always possible that they may wish to make comments or observations regarding this question, they may even wish to have a wish list of further priviledges. Perhaps you might like to make a general posting, either, or via our Admin/Moderator into SB1.0 to get a greater feeling of SB1.0 member views and also to enquire what members would like to see for future developmen of the forum, it might be greeted with ideas for your consideration.
An example of a further priviledge might be permitting images or even snippets of a webpage (or PDF filetype) limited to "x" characters or "y" paragraphs from that webpage with a "read more" link to the external website delivered within a AJAX accordion control. Of course I appreciate there may well be legal issues in displaying such content, and this will require a more active Admin/Moderator to quickly squash that which should not appear except by means of a hyperlink to an external resource.
modified 1-Aug-19 21:02pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Earlier there were three options to submit the article on code project on this page http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/Submit.aspx[^]
I used to submit the article through option 2, i.e. uploading the package from within the page.Now Option 2 is missing and Option 3 has become Option 2.
Is it a bug or an update?
Thanks
Do not forget to comment and rate the article if it helped you by any means.
|
|
|
|
|
It was removed due to abuse. If it's stopping you submitting then I'll re-enable it.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
My answer to the question disappeared: Web Development | Steps for Beginner to Expert.[^].
Right after the posting, it showed "pending" status and then disappeared immediately, after the page refresh. I did not copy it before posting, so lost it completely.
Sorry, loosing it is not entirely my fault; it never happened before. I really want it back, at least for my own records. It is possible to restore it?
Thank you.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
You used phrases and words that triggered the spam filter. I approved you reply and it should be visible now.
Even Chris gets caught by it occasionally. To much marketing, I think.
|
|
|
|
|
No way! Thank you anyway.
What are those hints on marketing, by the way?
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Did you consider letting the spam filter take the member's reputation into account?
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe it did 
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
No way!
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Once again my new article about "LeMP" didn't show up in the weekly newsletter... so I waited for the next newsletter and it didn't appear there either. I rely on the newsletter for page views, so I was wondering if you guys could put it in the next one? Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
I think your VS 2015 and .Net 4.6 has sneaked onto the site before it is ready!.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
I'm playing with VS2015 since it's first beta (about 4 months) - so it's not that early...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
