|
Tom Deketelaere wrote: I guess we can agree on disagreeing
at least on this topic. 
-----------------------------
Just along for the ride.
-----------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
There's a difference, though, between somebody who's an inveterate spammer and a member who has succumbed to the temptation to post a couple of spam messages, but otherwise has been a decent poster. In the first case, deleting the entire account is acceptable, but in the second case, just deleting the spam messages is a better option. The problem with the Report a member option is that it is the nuclear option - it's not a surgical strike.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: The problem with the Report a member option is that it is the nuclear option - it's not a surgical strike.
Yes. However, most of the spammer notices here in this forum are requesting the nuclear option and not the drone, killed by friendly fire, option. 
-----------------------------
Just along for the ride.
-----------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
OT:
Hi, Did you notice Pete's icon[^]? 
|
|
|
|
|
I sort of agree... I've posted one person here before but only because I wasn't sure whether he was a spammer or not (subtle spam), but overall, should probably be left to the community to sap instead of taking up Chris' time. Maybe if we could agree as a community to post these elsewhere for other members to review (so you still bring attention to the spammer and zap him if needed)?
|
|
|
|
|
I have just been replying "I have reported this member" whenever somebody reports a spammer here. It sets a good example while not devaluing the service others are providing who may not know about the new report feature.
Driven to the ARMs by x86.
|
|
|
|
|
AspDotNetDev wrote: It sets a good example while not devaluing the service others are providing who may not know about the new report feature.
It does set a good example and I do sincerely commend you for it.
It is not my intention to "devalue" anyone's service, if I have, then I greatly apologize. With that said, I don't think the report feature is entirely new and almost every active member here knows about it or has heard about it or will soon know about it.
-----------------------------
Just along for the ride.
-----------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
I requested Chris Maunder about it; he confirmed that it is appropriate to reports spammers here.
I guess there are too many reports around, and finding such extreme and relatively rare cases like commercial spam separately would be appropriate enough. Some reports ends up removing messages permanently but in extreme violations cancellation of the offender account should be used; usually it does not happen as a result of standard report. The system and organization may have some problem right now, but we need just practical solutions.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Here's my take:
It takes Sean or myself 2 seconds to check a reported spammer and then remove the account, and the sooner these parasites are removed the better. However, I always much prefer seeing the community take care of things, mob-lynch style. Go forth and report. I'll always be here to mop up the ones that got away.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: I always much prefer seeing the community take care of things
Agree.
Thanks for the reply though. Do you think that it may be helpful if we had another icon for spammer alert posts? That way I could see at a glance who is about to be terminated and what is just a site issue.
Thanks Chris.
-----------------------------
Just along for the ride.
-----------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
Moron keeps posting a web site: believe_own[^] here Online Store[^].
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair.
nils illegitimus carborundum
me, me, me
|
|
|
|
|
You guys got to him quickly. Certainly saves me the work!
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
It's driving me to distraction... how can we get by with unbalanced quotation marks???
|
|
|
|
|
_Damian S_ wrote: how can we get by with unbalanced quotation marks???
This is what I mean...
|
|
|
|
|
Here are some closes to go on with...
” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ”
Cheers 
Peter
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994.
|
|
|
|
|
I think it looks ok... its not about being grammatically correct... its just to differentiate a quote easily.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you!
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I actually like it, it makes the quote stand out from the other text. I've seen this used in books as well so its not like its a bad method.
|
|
|
|
|
Recent reputation history table seems to go past its border (fixed layout) when you have a really long line of text in one of the boxes ("item name" is the one I'm noticing this with).
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks - will be fixed this morning.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Squashed.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
The hamsters, in unison, put down tools and saluted you.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: The hamsters, in unison, put down tools and saluted you.
Then with an ear shattering crack of the whip and a thunderous "back to work you fuzzy little beasties" order was restored!
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
