|
Bill_Keydel wrote: That was correct when rfc 1123 ruled BUT in Oct 1989 it was replaced by RFC 1123
The king is dead! Long live the king!
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Dan Neely wrote: The king is dead! Long live the KING!
FTFY.
|
|
|
|
|
On the front page I see the pending articles/tips, but when I open any of them I don't have any options to approve or report the article. Few days ago this was working just fine... 
|
|
|
|
|
Even the report flag is gone? Thanks for letting us know, we'll take a look
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Mika,
It is working again now. Sorry about it (Old bug that was triggered by recent changes  )
Sincerely,
Elina Blank
Life is great!!! Enjoy every moment of it! 
|
|
|
|
|
Yep, works like a charm. Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I am facing an issue with one of my articles. When I update the article without checking "Mark this article as Updated", the modification date becomes the creation date.
Thereby, as a workaround, I am obliged to mark the article as updated.
Kind regards,
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Akram El Assas,
Thanks for the report.
The issue found, fixed and will be available soon
Sincerely,
Elina Blank
Life is great!!! Enjoy every moment of it!
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not native english speaking. Which means that my english is far from perfect. A couple of years ago when I wrote articles you were very good at proof reading and fixing my grammar errors.
I used to wait for an edit and then check the diff to see which errors I've made and learn from them.
I've written three articles in a short time. And it doesn't seem like you proof read at all now. And that's sad imho. That was one of the best things with writing articles here. I could trust you to help me improve my articles (and let me learn thanks to that).
Please read articles more carefully before you publish them. Especially if someone writes "please proof read" in the editor comment box.
|
|
|
|
|
If English is not your native language then I would say your writing is remarkable, considering. Which article in particular are you looking at?
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think you have a strong grasp of spelling and grammar. I've gone ahead and finely combed these over, but I'd be happy to go more in depth with the proofreading of your articles if you'd like. Feel free to email me about any changes to your articles (now or later) and I'd be happy to go over the changes/additions I applied and why. Some of it is preference (I find commas in particular to be individual taste) but I'm happy to explore the "why" of all the changes if you would find that helpful.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
modified 18-May-12 8:47am.
|
|
|
|
|
I believe email links require a "mailto:" to be prefixed to the URL for them to work*. The current link you created makes it look as if there's a forum dedicated entirely to your email.
*Though, I wouldn't recommend putting your email on a public forum at all (especially not in plain text form).
|
|
|
|
|
Drat. Thanks for the catch.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think either of those articles were actually "edited" - they were just "approved". And perhaps while approving, some quick HTML fixes may have been done.
In the old days, an article would show as unedited, and most editors would often make quick fixes and leave it unedited. They'd only mark it as edited once they did a full proof-read/editing on it. But with the new system, there's no such "unedited" status any more and this may be what's confusing.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I would like to delete my account because I'm not using it.
Can you please help me and let me know when this happens?
Thank you!
|
|
|
|
|
this account? I can do that in 2 sec.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I´ve completed my article "Get injected into the world of inverted dependencies" but can't uncheck the "Work in progress". I´ve tried several times to uncheck it and publish the article.
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry about this.
Your article is in pending now.
You should be able to change it freely from pending back to composing ("work in progress" ) and vice versa.
Sincerely,
Elina Blank
Life is great!!! Enjoy every moment of it!
|
|
|
|
|
Chris,
I have this in my Rep. history: "16 May 2012 12:20 PM Newsletter opt-in (undo) Participant MailoutType Feedback -50". The only thing I changed yesterday was checking the box that allowed private emails to my messages. As far as I can see, I'm opted in to all the newsletters. So what gives?
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
All fixed. It was an old, inactive newsletter that you were opted out of. Elina's fixed the spurious rep.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Five days to respond? Either you're slacking, were out of coffee, or were on vacation. Which is it?
And thanks (to you and Elina)!
|
|
|
|
|
5 days? I think you're DATEDIFF function needs some work.
You need to pay extra for the 5-day express service. Besides, there was thinking time involved. And pondering. And there was a certain amount of staring at one's navel that had to be completed.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: 5 days? I think you're DATEDIFF function needs some work.
Oops! I thought it was May 12, 2017 instead of May 17, 2012. 
Chris Maunder wrote: And there was a certain amount of staring at one's navel that had to be
completed.
Ah, yes, the original lint tool.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
