|
Either Chris changed his name, or there is a typo in today's Daily Build[^]:
Quote: cheers
Chris Maunderr
The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
I have no idea what happened with that editorial. Three typos, and I apologise for them. Way too many moving parts last night as we deployed a bunch of changes.
IProofRead: Unable to Resolve Reference.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
You were using MEF? Managed Education Failure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What happens when you enter your Country?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I'm soooo tempted to say the Border guards check his passport and let him through.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I set France and this message appears "Unable to sign you up and sign you in. Please select a country." when I click on download. I tried on IE and chrome and had the same error. It's strange now, I have been able to download it, but I don't know how :s ... in fact, if I first login, it's possible to download it
|
|
|
|
|
This should work now. Apologies for that.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
#">
|
|
|
|
|
Yes?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
j00Z Ph41L @ |-|4><0r1|\|9, |\|00B!
\/\/|-|@ d0 j00Z 937 \/\/|-|3|\| j00Z (R055 4 j0|<3 \/\/17|-| 4 r|-|370R1(4L QU35710|\|?
---
7|-|3 /\/\374P|-|0r1(4L $0L1D r34r-3|\|D 3>
|
|
|
|
|
+++ OUT OF CHEESE ERROR +++
|
|
|
|
|
I've unsubscribed from the daily news mailings 3 times, but I still receive them.
Can someone please tell me a way that works since using the link provided doesn't?
|
|
|
|
|
Can you please forward me (chris@codeproject.com) the email from which you are trying to subscribe? I'll dig in and get the issue fixed.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
i need procedures to delete my account in CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
sekarjack wrote: i need procedures to delete my account in CodeProject
While they would appreciate your nice gesture, I am fairly sure they'd prefer to run the sp_delete_member proc on their database on their own. 
|
|
|
|
|
Today, 08/25/2014 I got a weekly CP newsletter. What a mess! Before, we had categories like C++, Android, etc., and New Articles, Updated Articles, Tips, etc. You could quick find new C++ article and skip Android if you are not interested.
Now all are in one messy list with these stupid thumbnails to the left. Do guys who change the layout have any clues how people are using CP newsletters? It is better to return to old layout immediately.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the constructive feedback.
You don't like the new look? That's fine and I understand and I will be adjusting it in the next few days.
What about providing some ideas of what you do like?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
what i liked in newsletter were categories, now i don't see a reason to even look into daily build email...I dont care about images really. Please return old format or at least give an option to choose
TYVM
|
|
|
|
|
First of all, there is very little info you can extract from thumbnails. I see no help from them.
Second, any newsletter layout should make search for the article or programming tip easier. For example, I am the C++ guy. So, before, I went straight to C++ category. So it is not about like/don't like the new look. This is about no possibility to use a newsletter: would you scan all newsletter to find there is nothing for you today.
Please return to old layout with categories, new and updated articles/tips/blogs. I saw another post here with the same request.
Again, the new layout renders newsletters of no use. I would rather use search for latest C++ articles than wander amid these thumbnails.
|
|
|
|
|
geoyar wrote: I saw another post here with the same request.
Did you see the answer of Yuriy Loginov? He explains the idea behind and tells about the use of filters. Using them you should take ride of your not desired content.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, filter might help, but also might be very wrong. For example, lot of articles on design patterns are in C#. So if you are C++ guy and are interested in design patterns, you have to invent a very complicated filter and for what? To allow wrong solution to exist?
I think your position is not defensible. You took the good layout and replaced it with very bad. And you insist that the users should do their own extra work to correct what you did.
And what about new/updated?
And answer honestly: what did you want to accomplish? Definitely you made life of the readers much more difficult. For what?
Restore the old layout and keep it until you find something better.
Addition: I read the reply by Yuriy. I think it is totally wrong. If the guy is searching a list for what he needs, it is totally wrong to narrow the field of the search as it was suggested. Sometimes you can find a pearl on the side. What is important, it is to give him a clear cues what he is looking at. In your solution the user sees the list without cues, and it is wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
You missunderstood me, I am not defeinding anything. I just wanted to point out the answer of the CP-Staff (just in case you missed it)
I understand your point.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
