|
As there is no real way to automagically measure the significance of an update, I would vote against resetting the decay factor.
Updates still get rewarded indirectly - an update tends to result in renewed exposure which (assuming the article is worthy), leads to more upvotes.
As a side note, I would also say that the act of downloading should result in any rep points.
Graham
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted this on the article discussion board and then ASP.NET forum, but was directed to post it here.
Article from 18 Feb 2004: A Simple protocol to view aspx pages without IIS implemented in C#. Since the code has "no explicit license attached to it", can I use and distribute code with my applications under the terms of the CPOL 1.02? I did not find any additional license or terms in the article or the code downloaded. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
Andy's still active on CP (made posts today). Post a message on the article forum asking him (he'll get an email notice). I suspect he just hasn't thought about it for his old stuff since the explicit license feature is only a few years old.
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
|
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
Today while writing my latest 2 articles, it really became obvious and annoying how this little bug is;
While using the WYSIWYG editor, every 99% of the time I hit enter to carriage return, the editor lost focus and I had then to reclick in the editor with the mouse to return focus to the control and continue typing.
This is on Chrome 11.0.696.71 by the way.
Another little bug I noticed was on the insert link popup dialog. The submit / cancel buttons are 'off dialog' and had to resize to access them.
Cheers,
|
|
|
|
|
I stopped using the online editor after it gave me several free obedience lessons. Don't use it. Problem solved, no worries!
|
|
|
|
|
Cheers Hans,
I don't generally, but they were simple (really simple) articles, and I couldn't be bothered wrestling with the templates and VS editor etc etc.
They were fine apart from the couple of bugs..... 
|
|
|
|
|
This article. Some of the text (message bodies, message timestamps, "rate this message") in the forum under that article is orange (same shade as headers in the article). I think maybe there's an unclosed tag or something of that sort. I only see it in IE8 (looks fine in Chrome and FF). Another possibility is that some closing tags are in the wrong order and some browsers are handling it better than others (e.g., <b><i>wrong</b></i>).
|
|
|
|
|
It was a spurious <h2 /> tag. IE8 doesn't consider it self-closed so it affects the rest of the page.
All fixed.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
According to my reputation history, my tip/trick just got downvoted, but there are no new comments. I thought downvotes required a comment to be posted.
|
|
|
|
|
I spent last night reworking the tips/tricks voting and just discovered (and fixed) this issue. As soon as I get a chance to upload it will be better.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Too late, suckers! I'm going on a downvote spree and nobody will know what hit them. Mwahahahaha!
|
|
|
|
|
After load testing the code I had in this article:
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/silverlight/LSHTMLAPP.aspx
I have decided to delete it and write another article using another method
Can you please delete it?
|
|
|
|
|
No problem. It is currently locked by you for editing, but as soon as it is not we will delete it.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry for being so lame, but I honestly looked and cannot figure out how to 'unlock the article'
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think it's common knowledge 
Every time you go into edit an article, that article becomes locked for 20 mins. So, amusingly enough, by going in to figure out how to unlock your article, you've locked it again 
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
The the answer is "just do nothing"
|
|
|
|
|
Sean Ewington wrote: So, amusingly enough, by going in to figure out how to unlock your article, you've locked it again
It's not a bug, it's a feature
|
|
|
|
|
Keith Barrow wrote: It's not a bug, it's a feature
It is indeed. Shouldn't lazy programming be supported by CP as well
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
It's a weak referenced editor.
|
|
|
|
|
Just edit the article with a new download and article content.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
|
I tried searching for this topic but of course, it didn't work.
I searched for "sql statement generator" and got nothing. I put the same thing in Google and got the article I was looking for as the second result.
Thomas
|
|
|
|
|
works for me[^]
Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
The quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get. Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they improve readability. CP Vanity has been updated to V2.3
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
