|
You posted the same question again?
Then it has been deleted after some users reported it as 'Repost'.
|
|
|
|
|
No, I did not repost, as it was deleted few days back, I posted it again now.
|
|
|
|
|
Then the only one who can answer you why is the one that deleted your question.
But there may be no specific reason when your question was deleted accidentally (some users here have the power to do so and hitting the delete button inadvertently may happen).
You already posted the question again which is the best you can do in such cases. In fact you already got an answer to the new question while the old one was unanswered (as far as I know, I can't access the old one).
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I got it. Thanks for your time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Which associated files?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Source code.But it has been fixed 
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure how it is happening, but this[^] post seems to have a tool tip type window associated with it. When I move my mouse over the post, at the same time that the text is underscored as a link, a small tool tip type window appears with the text "Unable to replicate" contained in the window. It also happens with the mouse over the poster's name. Not sure if the text is referring to a bug or maybe if a neutered hamster is crying out. 
Chris Meech
I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar]
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra]
posting about Crystal Reports here is like discussing gay marriage on a catholic church’s website.[Nishant Sivakumar]
|
|
|
|
|
That's because I've marked it "Unable to replicate" (not to be confused with "I have a headache tonight"). See the icon at the left of the subject line?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Just like I've been answered. Thanks Chris.
Chris Meech
I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar]
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra]
posting about Crystal Reports here is like discussing gay marriage on a catholic church’s website.[Nishant Sivakumar]
|
|
|
|
|
Screenshot.[^]
Is it just Firefox, or is it an issue with the site?
I think computer viruses should count as life. I think it says something about human nature that the only form of life we have created so far is purely destructive. We've created life in our own image.
Stephen Hawking
|
|
|
|
|
See this[^] Lounge post.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
I was of the opinion that the Blog entry visible on my profile page is for posting just about anything. I posted a message on that last week and it was actually not a spam. but still it was reported as spam by someone.
I have posted the message again. Could someone please let me know if it is Spam by any definition. It is just a list of my articles: http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/4430612/Articles-selected-as-Article-of-the-Day-on-Microso.aspx[^]
Every now and then say, "What the Elephant." "What the Elephant" gives you freedom. Freedom brings opportunity. Opportunity makes your future.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think it is spam.
I wonder if the reporter was over-caffeinated?
I think computer viruses should count as life. I think it says something about human nature that the only form of life we have created so far is purely destructive. We've created life in our own image.
Stephen Hawking
|
|
|
|
|
Zac Greve wrote: I don't think it is spam.
Thank you. 
Zac Greve wrote: I wonder if the reporter was over-caffeinated?
That is scary, Someday, perhaps, such "over-caffeinated" guys can report me as spammer and get my account blocked too. 
Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore, Dream. Discover.
|
|
|
|
|
It's either that or under-caffeinated! Not sure which one is worse.
Although, was it just one report that removed the message?
I think computer viruses should count as life. I think it says something about human nature that the only form of life we have created so far is purely destructive. We've created life in our own image.
Stephen Hawking
|
|
|
|
|
The report didn't got it deleted. I deleted it out of fear 
Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore, Dream. Discover.
|
|
|
|
|
How do you know it was reported as spam then?
|
|
|
|
|
The reputation points show that someone reported it as spam and deducted some points.
Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore, Dream. Discover.
|
|
|
|
|
So, you post something that gets reported as spam. Remove it and then repost it so that someone can report it as spam again? Very brave.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: So, you post something that gets reported as spam. Remove it and then repost it so that someone can report it as spam again?
Actually, when I saw the message I knew I couldn't get to my computer for a couple of days and I wanted to initiate this discussion here. Now if the message was really a spam then by today I would have got a lot of spam reports so I decided to simply delete it from my phone.
Today, I decided to ask others' opinion about the message but couldn't restore the message so I posted it again.
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: Very brave.
Well my colleagues here think its kinda stupid thing which i did. I am guessing you are also using euphemism for the same. 
Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore, Dream. Discover.
|
|
|
|
|
It doesn't look like spam to me, so I would have left the post there. The assumption here is that the spam vote was a single person being overzealous.
|
|
|
|
|
Why do you say it was reported as spam? I can't find any such reports against your post.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
That could be because the one reported as spam was deleted by me on Friday. I posted the same message again.
Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore, Dream. Discover.
|
|
|
|
|
I used the online submission wizard to submit an article - everything looks fine if I click the 'Preview' button. But after the I click the submit button, the images disappear. Additionally, the 'download demo' and 'download source' links stop working.
I uploaded 2 images: unhandledexception.jpg and application.designer.vb.jpg
The article is http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/495208/VB-Net-Global-Try-Catch-in-the-Application-Framewo[^]
According to the wizard, for uploaded images, I should use a relative path of the file. So I tried to do  in the html editor, but that didn't work.
I did figure out that if I do: http://www.codeproject.com/KB/Articles/495208/Working/unhandledexception.jpg[^] I get the image to come up in my browser.
I don't want to specify a full image path because I don't think I am supposed to do that...
Anyway help on what I am doing wrong, or if this could be confirmed as a bug would be greatly appreciated!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
