|
I've just uploaded an update to one of my articles. Easy as!
Now, what's your problem? Just saying "it sucks" will elicit little help, always try to think from the devs point of view when reporting a bug, what does Chris and the gang need to know?
Reality is an illusion caused by a lack of alcohol
"Nagy, you have won the internets." - Keith Barrow
|
|
|
|
|
Whenever I want to upload the zip file containing a demo to the an article, it always take time before it upload. An error "Unexpected error during upload. One or more files may not have been uploaded." always come up.
This has always been my experience when uploading zip files on CP.
|
|
|
|
|
We're always here to help. Please let us know what browser / OS you're using. In the meantime always feel free to send your articles to the editors to post for you at submit[at]codeproject.com including the article and code in a .rar, or renamed .zip (ie .notzip) file. It could be that the file you're uploading is too large, or perhaps you've had the editor open too long.
In any case, please feel free to send me the files and / or the URL. We'd like the process to be as painless as possible.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
I am using Google Chrome Version 28.0.1500.71m on Windows 8
-EDIT-
The article is posted, I am revising it. It is already saved as Revision 4 and am just to attach the newly edited code to it. How am I to send only the code while pointing to the article and revision to attach it too?
|
|
|
|
|
You should be able to "publish" the article in Composing status by selecting it as a work in Progress like so:
Code Project Article FAQ[^]
Please send me the URL to that and the files if you would like me to attach them.
Also, I attempted to replicate the issue on Windows 8 and that version of Chrome, but was, unfortunately, unsuccessful.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
I think it is Chrome that is causing this. I downloaded Opera Version 12.15 and just in one click, the demo was uploaded...
|
|
|
|
|
When changing from Article to Tip, (possibly vice versa) the links to the images and sources get broken and you get the strangest error message of "no ticket" if I remember correctly.
Cheers,
Edo
Never underestimate the difference U can make in the lives of others.
∫(Edo )dx = Tzumer
∑k( this.Kid) k = this. ♥
|
|
|
|
|
In QA section we have "Reply" widget where people can reply to comments but it seems very faint(IE) so most of the people don't click on reply widget & add new comment instead of replying to previous message. Hence the person who has asked any question/comment doesn't get any notification & it goes unheard/unanswered irrespective the OP has reply to his message.
Please see this image[^]
or this Question's comments section label visible on Dropdown selected vale item[^]
I have seen this so many times as OP is new to forum.
modified 10-Jul-13 4:50am.
|
|
|
|
|
I'd hoped that simply moving your mouse over each row and having the buttons "pop" out would highlight the reply functionality more than simply having the icons fully exposed. I prefer it as it is.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I think Sushil Mate has a point here.
Chris Maunder wrote: having the buttons "pop" out would highlight the reply functionality
In the present case, it is the whole comment block that gets highlighted when hovered, not only the reply
icon. This behavior is somehow inconsistent with the rest of the design, in which I always get a rectangular outline (or even a complete button appearing) on the clickable zone only, what clearly makes clickable zones stand out.
Propositions:
1. Do not highlight the whole line, but only the "reply" button, as in a forum message highlighting. So by hovering the comment, the "reply" icon background will also get dark red (or crimson or whatever the color is named, I am no woman).
or
2. Highlight the whole line AND get the icon background dark red.
or
3. Make the whole line clickable, and a click would fire up a reply. (I reckon this could be an annoying behaviour on touchscreens, as you could not touch a comment to scroll down/up).
I know that you wrote that you prefer the current behaviour, I still try my luck. 
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Do not feed the troll ! - Common proverb
|
|
|
|
|
While he did post a bad joke (I must say that), I don't think he should be banned from this forum for that one bad joke.
|
|
|
|
|
|
He has to put his nonsense joke in the lounge so CPians will come to know his reinstatement.
|
|
|
|
|
I came here to post the same thing, but it Pompey bhaiya was ahead of us.
"Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.
|
|
|
|
|
A while back, I posted a bug, "Tips Categorized Incorrectly". I have since discovered that the page in question generates different HTML depending on whether or not I am logged in.
If I am logged in, I don't get this bit of HTML:
<div id="ctl00_MC_TR_ctl05_CAR_SectionDiv">
<h3>Programming Tips</h3>
</div>
<div id="ctl00_MC_TR_ctl05_CAR_SubsectionDiv">
<p><a id="ctl00_MC_TR_ctl05_CAR_SubsectionLink" href="/KB/tips/">General</a></p>
<div style="border-bottom:solid 1px #CCCCCC;margin-left:40px;"></div>
</div>
I think there was another header that also didn't get generated, but you get the idea.
|
|
|
|
|
Gryphons Are Awesome! Gryphons Are Awesome!
|
|
|
|
|
I went to my Reputation History, and I saw that at least 15 of my answers were bookmarked (all posted in December). I've no idea why, because these answers aren't related with each other. I find that this looks strange and suspicious.
I'm posting this because I don't want to be considered as a sock-puppeteer.
modified 9-Jul-13 13:15pm.
|
|
|
|
|
ProgramFOX wrote: I'm posting this because I don't want to be considered as a sock-puppeteer.
Isn't that exactly what you'd say if you were a sock-puppeteer? 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
If I really was a sock-puppeteer then I wouldn't post this thread and would I bookmark my answers from August 2012.
|
|
|
|
|
Expect your own episode of 'This is your life' any day now or perhaps 'they' are just gathering evidence for the trial 'they' haven't told you about. 
"The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage."
Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)
|
|
|
|
|
Yes.. same for me too on July 9th 11 of answers were book marked. All of them bookmarked in 45 mins. someone is playing around here.. get ready for knocking him down.
|
|
|
|
|
I would have assumed CP has installed an automatic Bookmark-As-Fast-As-You-Can identifier, after all these things are standard and fairly simple to implement...
Never underestimate the difference U can make in the lives of others.
∫(Edo )dx = Tzumer
∑k( this.Kid) k = this. ♥
|
|
|
|
|
Hi ProgramFox,
Why not assume that someone(s) finds your answers valuable ?
yours, Bill
“Human beings do not live in the objective world alone, nor alone in the world of social activity as ordinarily understood, but are very much at the mercy of the particular language which has become the medium of expression for their society. It is quite an illusion to imagine that one adjusts to reality essentially without the use of language and that language is merely an incidental means of solving specific problems of communication or reflection." Edward Sapir, 1929
|
|
|
|
|
A couple of hours ago, someone posted a question in which he provided a secret Twitter key. Manfred R. Bihy[^] suggested to delete his question, because even if the OP would edit his question and remove the key, the first version would still be visible. And I said that it's also possible to see deleted questions if you know the question ID (by going to the ListVersion.aspx?aid=<questionID> page and choosing the latest version). Manfred replied here[^] that he thinks deleted questions shouldn't be visible. But I use this "feature" when I report abuse if the abusive question is already deleted, to prove that it's really abuse.
So I've this suggestion: the question shouldn't be accessible if the OP deleted it, but still accessible if the question is closed after 3 reports (or perhaps when it's deleted by a Protector/Admin).
What do you think?
|
|
|
|
|
Just what it says on the tin. I haven't received any notifications since yesterday for any replies to my posts in any of the forums.
Reality is an illusion caused by a lack of alcohol
"Nagy, you have won the internets." - Keith Barrow
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
