|
I just came across the following comment in some code in our core application:
Care to guess when that was written? (it is still in our code now)
Answer:- I don't know because it was already in the first version of the code loaded into our version control system.
|
|
|
|
|
I went to school in a very, very temporary building that was put up shortly after World War 2. It's still going strong.
On that basis, the code should be good a few decades yet.
Slogans aren't solutions.
|
|
|
|
|
Is that comment followed by just-good-enough code that somebody should go back and rewrite?
if (Object.DividedByZero == true) { Universe.Implode(); }
Meus ratio ex fortis machina. Simplicitatis de formae ac munus. -Foothill, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
Hard coded list of currency codes. I guess it was good enough to last.
|
|
|
|
|
What. The. F***.[^]
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: make USB safer and easier to use by bringing it to the Web
I may have missed something, but on what planet does this make any rational sense?
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Kreskowiak wrote: on what planet does this make any rational sense?
Cue jokes about the seventh planet...
But I heartily concur with your sentiments.
Cheers,
Peter
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Web developers!
When there is a nail, Javacript could sure hammer it!
|
|
|
|
|
And the archive is for March.
One day later and I'd assume ...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
make USB safer and easier to use by bringing it to the Web
At last! Everything is safer when it's on the web!
|
|
|
|
|
Come on now, this isn't a bad idea.
I mean, it has to be in an HTTPS context, right? That's, like, more secure than ring 0!
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics."
- Benjamin Disraeli
|
|
|
|
|
WTF indeed.
"But most importantly this will make USB safer and easier to use by bringing it to the Web."
Has USB ever been dangerous?
But look, don't be too hard on this guy, he is trying to build his Microsoft career on this crap.
|
|
|
|
|
|
And connecting it to the net is going to make all the difference is it?
|
|
|
|
|
Noooooo! This must be prevented! He could fry the internets! :bwa!:
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
My god, all those IoTs dying, the shock, the horror!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Right, so its an RNDIS USB device that gives the PC a new route to its IP address, and sniffs for cookies.
Now tell me, how is 'WEB USB' going to make that any safer?
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think either of us were saying that connecting USB to the net would make it any safer. We're just responding to your question:
Munchies_Matt wrote: Has USB ever been dangerous?
by giving you examples of times when USB has been extremely dangerous.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: I don't think either of us were saying that connecting USB to the net would make it any safer
You didn't read the OP's link then?
|
|
|
|
|
It sounds like they're talking about USB drivers for Linux. I haven't had to go to a website to download a USB driver for Windows in years. Many years.
But just try and get some USB device on Linux to work, yeah, 3 days and 15 drivers later, it still doesn't work.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
How is different from installing driver?
now we do same thing, driver be downloaded
someone still have to make driver even with this webusb? can make harmful driver and steal data so not safer?
|
|
|
|
|
Said website is for Psychology 120, as I need to participate in research studies for credits.
I (along with numerous other students) couldn't log in, as we would get an invalid credentials error, no matter what (and yes they were valid).
Yesterday I found out that the issue was a very messed up validation function that failed for seemingly random valid inputs and succeeded for seemingly random invalid inputs.
The function was only supposed to be one line, sent to the person in an email (copy and paste), calling a REST service to match the user ID against the database. The person writing it somehow managed to mess that up and break the site.
The function was apparently about 300 lines when the idjit was done.
Messing something simple like that up requires a special kind of stupid. How do you mess up a F****** ONE LINE FUNCTION, WHEN THE ACTUAL CODE WAS GIVEN TO YOU?!?
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
He refactored it... it didn't meet his design specifications.
|
|
|
|
|