|
Kevin Marois wrote: None of the requests work.
Kevin Marois wrote: If I paste the ResponseUri into a browser it comes back with: (data)
So which is it? If you paste the URL into the browser, does it come back with data, or does it not work? 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
My UI calls through the proxy into the controllers, which calls to the DAL. The DAL returns a populated Response object back to the controllers. When the Responses get back to the proxy, they are always null.
If I paste the URI's into IE, I get back JSON with data in it. So it looks like some kind of serialization problem.
If it's not broken, fix it until it is
|
|
|
|
|
I am still stuck on this. I thought I might have solved it, but it's stil bot working.
None of my controller methods are deserializing the return objects. All methods return null.
However, if I paste the URL into a browser, it displays the JSON correctly. I have no clue what's wrong, and I don't know how to debugs this. I get no errors or other problem indicators.
Any ideas on what's wrong? Can you point me in the right direction for debugging this?
Thanks
[UPDATE]
I figured out the problem...
I'm using custom response objects that I'm returning from the all the way back to the UI. The base Response object has a property to hold the data. It is of type object, which from what I'm seeing in Google searches, cannot be deserialized. So the entire result object is being returned as null.
Any thoughts on what to do?
If it's not broken, fix it until it is
modified 28-Apr-14 0:59am.
|
|
|
|
|
How about making the base Response class a generic class, so that you have a strongly-typed property for your data?
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
I'm about to deploy an application that comprises a web site (ASP.NET MVC) and an API (WebAPI) using OAuth 2.0 for security.
Currently all the calls to the API are done server side by the web site and will be configured to use SSL as will the web site itself.
My question is about the certificate requirements, it appears that this isn't really detailed in the spec so thought I'd throw this out for discussion.
What are peoples thoughts on the use of SSL certificates in this scenario?
Do you require multiple certificates? One for securing the site and another separate one used for dealing with the token creation or would it be safe/good practice to use a single certificate?
Thanks,
Jammer
|
|
|
|
|
The following function used to work with the Telerik grid, but now that we have upgraded to Kendo, it no longer works.
function Grid_onLoad(e) {
$('.t-no-data td').text('Loading Records...');
}
I expected Telerik to replace the .t-no-data class reference with .k-no-data, but they haven't. The .t-no-data reference is still used and appears in the document, but the function no longer behaves the same. The 'Loading Records...' message is never displayed.
Anybody using t-no-data for a similar purpose?
|
|
|
|
|
I got the answer, and I'm posting it here in case anybody else needs to do something similar.
Move the loading message to the tbody
dataSource = new kendo.data.DataSource({
requestStart: function(){
$("#grid tbody").text("Loading data...");
},
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All,
I am trying to load large XML file(222 MB) using javascript for HTML format. It is taking a lot of time.
Can anyone suggest me to make it more efficient?
Any sample is more appreciated.
I am using something like below,
var xmlDoc=null;
if (window.ActiveXObject) //IE 8,9
{
xmlDoc=new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLDOM");
}
else if (document.implementation.createDocument)
{
xmlDoc=document.implementation.createDocument ("","",null);
}
else
{
alert('Your browser cannot handle this script');
}
if (xmlDoc!=null)
{
xmlDoc.async=false;
xmlDoc.load('Load.xml'); // Large xml file
}
|
|
|
|
|
Firstly, don't duplication your question over many forums.
Second, considering the size of the file, and what you are trying to do with the thing, why are you surprised it is taking a rather long period of time.
modified 1-Aug-19 21:02pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello Richard,
Sorry to bother you again.
I am new to web technology so I have not much idea on this.
Please provide me the best technique to achieve this.
Regards,
SMA
|
|
|
|
|
|
I get that Microdata and ARIA are the future for better integration of webpages.
Yet, in the present day there's a strong disadvantage of using them: filesize for mobile devices which bandwidth is costly.
However cheap it might be for you, I swear in some countries/areas every megabit matters for the billing.
I'd like to offer "my" websites' visitors an option to get light "Microdata/ARIA free" versions of the pages.
Do you know techniques to conditionally exclude all Microdata+ARIA markup before sending it to the end users?
FYI: I'll planning to do that using Wordpress PHP at first.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I have the following json in php.
I want to know how can achieve the same but in HTML?
I tried locating on the web but I was not able to find it..
<?php
$json_string = file_get_contents("http://api.wunderground.com/api/xxxxxxxxxx/geolookup/conditions/q/Bahrain.json");
$parsed_json = json_decode($json_string);
$latitude = $parsed_json->{'current_observation'}->{'display_location'}->{'latitude'};
$longitude = $parsed_json->{'current_observation'}->{'display_location'}->{'longitude'};
$weather = $parsed_json->{'current_observation'}->{'weather'};
$temp_c = $parsed_json->{'current_observation'}->{'temp_c'};
$relative_humidity = $parsed_json->{'current_observation'}->{'relative_humidity'};
$wind_kph = $parsed_json->{'current_observation'}->{'wind_kph'};
$feelslike_c = $parsed_json->{'current_observation'}->{'feelslike_c'};
$visibility_km = $parsed_json->{'current_observation'}->{'visibility_km'};
$icon = $parsed_json->{'current_observation'}->{'icon'};
?>
Technology News @ www.JassimRahma.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
yes.
I got it and solved the problem
but I have one issue.
my json url has an API key which I don't want it to be shown to the user?
is it possible to encrypt it or hide it?
this is my code:
<script type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function()
{
$.ajax({
url : "http://api.wunderground.com/api/xxxxxxxxx/geolookup/conditions/q/Bahrain.json",
dataType : "jsonp",
success : function(parsed_json) {
var location = parsed_json['location']['city'];
var icon_url = parsed_json['current_observation']['icon_url'];
var weather = parsed_json['current_observation']['weather'];
var temp_c = parsed_json['current_observation']['temp_c'];
var feelslike_c = parsed_json['current_observation']['feelslike_c'];
var relative_humidity = parsed_json['current_observation']['relative_humidity'];
var wind_kph = parsed_json['current_observation']['wind_kph'];
$("#imgWeather").attr("src", icon_url);
$("#lblWeather").text(weather);
$("#lblTempC").text(temp_c + " C");
$("#lblFeelsLike").text("Feels Like " + feelslike_c);
$("#lblHumidity").text(relative_humidity);
$("#lblWind").text(wind_kph);
}
});
});
</script>
Technology News @ www.JassimRahma.com
|
|
|
|
|
There is no trivial way to hide JavaScript code from end user - Google for 'obfuscate JavaScript' and start reading...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
Not from javascript.
But you can create a web service (in the middle) that grabs the json using the "secret url" then forwards its content to the end user.
|
|
|
|
|
Jassim Rahma wrote: my json url has an API key which I don't want it to be shown to the user?
is it possible to encrypt it or hide it?
The only way to completely hide the URL from the user is to make the request on the server-side. Even if you obfuscate your javascript, most browsers have developer tools which can log network requests.
The simplest option is probably to create a page on your site which loads the data from the remote service and echoes it directly to the response. That way, your script can call a page on your site without having to pass the API key.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Greetings,
I need to know about the cloud computing tech. especially the private cloud computing security and I need some help even with books URLs
|
|
|
|
|
|
A simple asp.net page: GridView in an UpdatePanel with a timer to refresh the data every minute.
Works Fine On My Machine, hitting IIS Express.
Doesn't ever refresh when deployed to the actual IIS server. It just sits there and laughs at me.
I've tried various combinations of Timer outside the UpdatePanel with the AsynPostBackTrigger set, Timer inside UpdatePanel with no trigger set. Timer tick explicitly saying to update the UpdatePanel. Etc etc etc, just like the two million Google hits suggest, to no avail.
Every "fix" works fine on my machine.
It just refuses to work on the server.
Is there an IIS setting of some sort that might be causing it? Elsewhere on the page (outside the UpdatePanel) is a Panel with the CollapsiblePanel extender tacked on which works fine, so it isn't a matter of Ajax not being there. Looking at the webpage source from the server and from VS, I see no differences other than the extra crap VS puts in when hosting.
relevent code:
<asp:Timer ID="Timer1" runat="server" OnTick="Timer1_Tick" Interval="60000" Enabled="true" EnableViewState="False">
</asp:Timer>
<asp:UpdatePanel ID="UpdatePanel1" runat="server" ChildrenAsTriggers="false" UpdateMode="Conditional" EnableViewState="False">
<Triggers>
<asp:AsyncPostBackTrigger ControlID="Timer1" EventName="Tick" />
</Triggers>
<ContentTemplate>
<asp:Label ID="lblLast" runat="server" Text="Newest Order: (waiting for update)" EnableViewState="False"></asp:Label>
<asp:Label ID="lblStatus" runat="server" Text="Checking for orders..." Visible="False" EnableViewState="False"></asp:Label>
<div class="Refreshed">
<asp:Label ID="lblRefresh" runat="server" CssClass="Refreshed" Text="Last Refreshed:" EnableViewState="False"></asp:Label>
</div>
<br />
<asp:GridView ID="grdStatus" runat="server" AutoGenerateColumns="False" CellPadding="4" ForeColor="#333333" Width="100%" CssClass="Grid" EnableViewState="False">
and
protected void Timer1_Tick(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
string Wards = Session["Wards"].ToString();
RefreshGrid(Wards);
}
(Ye, I'll rename things if I ever get it to work.)
|
|
|
|
|
There are some HTML content which designers has barely control over.
For instance, laying out checkboxes requires a lot of tricks (as far as I know).
Without those tricks, checkboxes can really mess the layout.
For instance (I hope it'll help showing my point) I once had a page having parts using a very big high font-size and having a few checkboxes. On many browsers, the font-size didn't cause a scale of checkboxes. Thus side to some huge text were normal (microscopic looking) checkboxes.
With new inputs like "range", "date", etc. there are now many new element which one doesn't have css control over.
Thus I'm wondering if I should avoid using such inputs.
Or maybe am I missing an important point.
Wath do you think?
modified 28-Mar-14 9:37am.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not aware of the problem you describe here...
It may be a browser support problem? Different browsers has different support level...
You may give us a specific sample to show your problem?
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
You could take a look at "range" for instance.
It display slightly differently on different browser.
And you can't set its height in firefox for instance.
So if you make a page whose sole/main purpose is to set a ranged value. And wish to make the slider bigger (the bigger it is, the easier it is for the end user) you actually can't.
Same would go it you were using a checkbox.
Live demo of Range[^]
|
|
|
|
|
I've seen now what are you talking about. I thought you have problem with HTML 5 itself, but it's clear that the problem is with implementation in different browsers.
There is nothing - except opening bug report with the browsers - you can do about it.
HTML 5 is still in 'Candidate Recommendation' state, so things can change...
You may look for JavaScript libraries that aim to provide HTML 5 support for older browser, and try it on FF...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
