|
done
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I had to delete an article on CP for a few days. Now I want to bring it back. How? I tried to restore revision from before deletion but it only creates new revision which is also in deleted state.
|
|
|
|
|
I believe I resurrected it for you
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you
|
|
|
|
|
This[^] is having some snippets that should be "text" but actually set on other language so they get weird coloring.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Rescued.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Hi :)
Is writing an article on an Exploit/Vulnerability allowed ?
|
|
|
|
|
In my opinion... it depends a lot of the target of the article.
If it is clearly technical and you explain about the exploit and how to solve it, I would be happy to read it.
But if you only explain how to take profit from it, then I would report it as abuse.
I hope you understand the difference I mean
But... The last words are on CP Staff.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Much like a Jedi, you can only write such articles for defense, never for attack.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for clarifying.
yes it is a white hat article with solutions, I raised it to facebook security apparently they think it is a non issue and poses no tangible security risk
I felt like hitting my head on the wall and migrating to mars when i heard that response .
so should be safe to publish to create awareness for those who value there privacy and get feed back from the community whether they think its an issue worth fixing.
Cheers
|
|
|
|
|
Pril Krishna wrote: those who value their privacy ...
... don't sign up for a Facebook account.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed.
Looks like that was a left-over from a formatting issue we had ages ago. I just touched the article and it fixed itself up.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
this[^] is showing the code snippets almost without format.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
All fixed.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Let say I have an article, current revision number is 100. I went to update it, and obviously the next revision number will be 101. After I submit, the article will go through the approval process. The reviewers/moderator will look at it and pick an option from "Approve or report this article:" section.
My question is, as a reviewer/moderator, how can I compare/tell what the changes/update between version 100 and 101? Since version 101 is not listed under Articles » Platforms, Frameworks & Libraries » Libraries » General » Revisions during the approval/review process.
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm. I don't believe you currently can from the system itself. I use an text compare site, personally.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting point.
What you're after is a "compare with published" button, right?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can't you do it with the versions revision?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
The current version revision do not provide the option to compare the published version and the one being submitted for review.
|
|
|
|