|
|
Thanks very much for your inquiry. The newsletters look to an article's rating when deciding whether or not to include an article in the pool. Unfortunately your article did not have a high enough rating / enough votes.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Thank's for your answer! You are surely right with the "Most popular new articles" section, but
I refer to the "New articles added" section.
How can an article be rated, if "nobody" knows that there is a new article out there
|
|
|
|
|
Actually yes, for the "New articles added" section too. New articles do get exposure elsewhere. For example, each new update or new article is displayed on the homepage for a period of time.
Still, I will discuss making the "new articles added" section more open with the team.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, but I can not follow your explanation about the necessary ratings for an article in the "New articles added" section:
This morning I read the newsletter and opened a very nice article within this section (Silverlight MVVM ...) - The article isn't rated at all (0 votes) and has a lot less views, downloads and bookmarks than mine...
|
|
|
|
|
I asked the dev team to double check the code. This article should not have been included. How as it included? Hard to say.
Have you ever seen Jurassic Park? Sometimes "life finds a way."
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|