|
Yes this would be an article. You can't consume it in under 30 seconds and it's not exactly a single problem with a single solution; it's more like a walk-you-through process.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
@Sean-Ewington please have a look: Auto Simulation with C#[^]
Not only a very bad quality got approved, it looks like the downloads are infected with malware.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
As it is the weekend I have closed it, until Sean gets in to work on Monday.
|
|
|
|
|
true... 
I need a break... I don't know in which day I am anymore
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm just gonna go ahead and delete this one  thank you kindly for the report.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Judging by the sticky post, this forum is solely intended for topics on article (blog, etc.) writing. Yet recently it has become more and more the go-to forum to report issues with approved articles. Isn't that what the moderator's forum is supposed to be for? I've already suggested to make the moderator's forum more visible (at least twice), as it's as good as useless now, hidden as it is. As my suggestions in the moderator's forum and in the bugs&sugs forum haven't yielded any response, I'm now trying it here 
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
Loosely Coupled Three-Tier Architecture in C#[^]
The code has blatantly obvious SQL injection vulnerabilities. I posted a message pointing that out while the article was in the moderation queue, but that was obviously a waste of time, because it's been approved.
I've re-posted the warning, and voted the article as "Inaccurate/misleading".
Edit: Plus, three images are missing. But I guess that doesn't matter to our approve-happy moderators either. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Article is marked as deleted now 
|
|
|
|
|
|
I can't judge the content, but it looks very ugly.
I have left a message to the owner, if no reaction in some days... could you give him a hand if the technical content deserves it?
Bind a DropDown on selection change of another DropDown using MVC and ajax[^]
I wonder who got it approved
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
@sean-ewington - I thought youtube downloaders were a no-no, since they violate their T&C's?
This one got through: Youtube Downloader in One Easy Class[^] - do you want to have a quiet word with him instead of a report in S&A?
[edit]I figured you deserved an extra "n" in your name...:InnocentWhistleSmiley:[/edit]
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, yes I do. And now I have. Thanks for the report.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
OK then.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
No I'm gonna approach with my arms outstretched first, hands away from my holster, speaking in a calm, "nobody-has-to-get-hurt-here" voice.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
This "article"[^]
And this one[^]
I voted extremely poor quality, but I honestly don't know what he is going on about in that wall of text in the first one, and the second one just isn't really there.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Could also be the case that they published the article by mistake, and are still in the process of composing it. In general, I tend to notify them of the possible issue and link to the Article/Tips FAQ.
|
|
|
|
|
This is for @sean-ewington
please have a look: Top 8 Continuous Integration Tools[^]
is this still on green?
It has free, free and paid, paid with demo... I don*t want to report it. I thought you might want to speak with him first.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
This feels a little different somehow. I need to have a think on this one. Thanks for the report, though.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, take your time 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
It got approved, but I would say it is at least needing a lot of improvement
Beginning Understanding of AngularJs[^]
Opinions?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like, it has been already deleted.
Vote up or Mark as Answered, if this information helped you.
Kind Regards - Kunal Chowdhury, Windows Platform Development MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Hi there,
Recently my article was nominated for Best Web Dev Article of January 2016. When I last logged in on Thursday 18th, I was winning by 10 votes or so. When I woke up on Friday 19th, the competition appeared to be closed (could no longer access the voting page.)
I notice that not only did I not win, but I didn't come second either. Neither of the top two articles in the results list made it to second. Is there a way to view the total vote count after the competition has closed, so I can see what happened?
Don't get me wrong, this isn't about being a sore loser. If another article won the competition then fair enough, I'd just like to know how the votes were finalised which determined another article, which was behind by around 10-20 votes, managed to accumulate so many in the space of a few hours I was asleep.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
If you go to the Survey list[^] and choose "General" as survey type, you can see a list of all past and ongoing article competition surveys. When I look at Survey Results - Best Web Dev Article of January 2016[^], it does show that your article is listed first there, but as the disclaimer says:
Quote:
Note: These results are un-audited numbers. All voting results will be tabulated and audited at the conclusion of voting. The results you see here may differ as a result of that auditing process. CodeProject.com makes no guarantees to the live results which you see here.
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
