|
|
I think I finished this article...
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/749521/Beginners-Guide-to-HTML-CSS-Part-of[^]
I need you help to proofread it...
I also have some problem with the video tag I use inside the article. While in editing it behaves as expected, but after saving it video tag displayed as text...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
modified 30-Mar-14 4:03am.
|
|
|
|
|
Consider it proofread.
Unfortunately you can't use video tags the way you were using them. The article editor is a picky beast.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you very much...
Maybe I will replace it with an image, just for the demonstration (anyway it plays nothing).
And...there is a 3rd part for the series, and I'm know that you have things to do, but if anyhow you can find the time to read...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
Absolutely, I will get to it as soon as I can. Fortunately your articles are wonderful, I am happy to edit them
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
- don't do it...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
Consider the third article edited.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
You just great!
Thank you...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
I tried to submit an article. It was approved but a comment was made. I then edited the article (according to changes) and submitted changes. I noticed that a link that I used was broken. So I edited it again (and submitted). I was then notified that it had automatically changed category. So I edited it again and submitted. I was receiving lots of positive feedback (like the first time) but no approval. So I thought that the multiple unapproved versions were the problem. So I thought of rolling back the changes (to delete the mistakes) but that just made another version. I then edited it again to be correct. Here is the link to the article The Idiot's Guide to Modern Web Design Part 1 / 12[^] Version 8 is the correct version. This is totally a beginner mistake I know I might be a bit impatient but I am worried that the wrong version will be judged for the HTML5 Article Contest. This is my first article Please Help
|
|
|
|
|
I deleted the article and pasted the content on a new article. It fixed the problem
|
|
|
|
|
|
Better now?
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I have submitted one article last night, moderator says it has some content copied from Microsoft MSDN site, I removed those content and re-published.
In morning my account is deleted. Not sure what is offensive or trolling I have done, Now I cannot log in and give any clarification and recover my article.
Account : RohitAndRohit@yahoo.com
Id : RohitDotNet
Please Help.
Rohit
|
|
|
|
|
From what I gather, your article was reported as containing other material taken from outside sources. This is why you were removed.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for Info.
I understood that but now how do I re-activate my account ?
|
|
|
|
|
I've released a beta version of the new WYSIWYG editor[^] we've been playing around with. So far so good, but please let me know if you see any major (or even minor) issues.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Well, here's a minor issue : "Sorry, can't find what you're looking for".
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, you want actual working links now, do you?
Sheesh. Kids these days!
(fixed)
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I was going to apply the telepathic version but seeing as that one's bug free I thought you'd prefer me to try out the ordinary version.
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, good point.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
It's always sad to watch when The Force starts fading from the great ones.
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
Fade not, it does. Testing the same version as you, I must.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm writing my second article using it and can't tell wrong so far. In fact the full screen mode is my new love ...
However, I wanted to ask you about that after-paste-popup you listed in your wish-list. How much it is important? I'm asking because of two reasons:
1. I didn't missed it
2. I made some experiments to add it and found some things that can be disturbing. The most important of them, that I wasn't able to add non-modal dialog to the editor. That alone may be a serious problem. So make it sort - I'm really like to know your preferences about it, it can help me to know how much time to spend on it...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
It's about a 5 out of 10 for me at the moment.
The Paste dialog code is actually all tbere - it sits outside of the editor. I haven't tried but my guess is it's as simple as trapping and processing the Paste message so that the container page (that has the Paste Dialog code) can get a crack at it.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|