|
yes, but there seems to be more than just applications. But that will suffice. There are a lot of good applications here web and forms that many people use. It is generally harder to find than most other categories. oh well. thanks
cheers,
Donsw
My Recent Article : Optimistic Concurrency with C# using the IOC and DI Design Patterns
|
|
|
|
|
Donsw wrote: It is generally harder to find than most other categories.
I agree. If you can think of a better way to organize this category in the category hierarchy, let Chris know.
(To be honest, I couldn't find it at first, and had to search for an article I knew was in that category, to find it. )
|
|
|
|
|
Is a confirmation required when submitting an article? I did some of the submission before the (public library computer) browser zonked out on me. In the past, it seemed like the pre-submitted articles were saved as you go.
|
|
|
|
|
In general I think it is not a good idea to rely entirely on CP article editor. Too many things can go wrong.
I think the best approach is to use PC-based editor (I use UltraEdit), view the file locally in browser, repeat as necessary, and then submit. There are also stand-alone WYSIWYG html editors.
But if you insist on using the CP editor, then before you submit, copy & paste all text into an editor, in case there is problem.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm agree with Hans.
I'm using Adobe Dreamweaver.
|
|
|
|
|
Submission seems to be an all-or-nothing operation, unlike in the past. The ending confirmation message is required for submission of anything.
I followed Hans' recommendation to use an editor, then copy and paste. I used Notepad, and success.
Thanks For The Info,
Ralph
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I posted an article some time back and want to make some changes to it. How can i do that?
Actually, don't know how my posted code changed and now it has compilation error's!!!
I again want to put the correct code.
Thanks,
NS.
|
|
|
|
|
Take a look here.
Regards,
--Perspx
|
|
|
|
|
I did not find any information on this on Codeproject.
Thank you.
Thanks,
--Radu
http://www.gruian.com
|
|
|
|
|
If your article is in a draft state (ie you started writing but didn't finish even to the point of it being pending) then in your article list there are red X's so you can quickly delete it.
For unedited articles (articles that have been posted but not yet edited by a CodeProject editor) there is the 'Delete' button at the top right of the article that allows you to delete.
If your article has been edited, then email submit@codeproject.com and ask an editor to delete it.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
I have a much better improvement to a previously submitted article from 2003:
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/cpp/cppproperties.aspx
There are significant changes, but I still want to acknowledge the origin of my source.
Should it be new article?
How should I submit it?
Thanks
Jeff Tanner
Jeff in Seattle
Interests:
Dating my spouse, Playing with my daughter, and Camping in my Sportsmobile.
|
|
|
|
|
As stated in the Submission Guidelines, if you want to use someone else's work, we ask that you attempt to contact the original author first and then try to liaise with him/her to produce an update to the original article. This way we can retain continuity with the original article as well as reducing the number of completely new pages that need posting.
Also make sure you retain any copyright notices that the member has on their work.
Regards,
--Perpsx
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wrong forum. Try the General forum instead.
|
|
|
|
|
This forum is for discussing the art of writing of articles. Do not ask programming questions here.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
Any interest in how to import the XML dumps from Wikipedia/Wiktionary into SQL Server?
I are troll
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eddy Vluggen wrote: Or would an import of the GeoNames-database-dump be more interesting? This binds zipcode to a placecode, along with country, county, and long/lat.
Yes - do that one. I'd enjoy reading it, because my company does one heckuva lot with GIS, and mining information like this would be invaluable.
|
|
|
|
|
You'll be wanting SQL Server 2008. Article has been submitted[^]
I are troll
|
|
|
|
|
The article you want to view was deleted at 14 Jan 2009. Please go to the ASP.NET Table of Contents to view the list of available articles in this section.
Last Updated: 15 Jan 2009
Editor:Sean Ewington[^]
Anyone give me some information?
|
|
|
|
|
Normally you should have received an email detailing the reasons, any comments from article approvers, stating why they thought your article should be deleted. What was your article called?
|
|
|
|
|
I did not get any email. maybe my email is not confirmed.
It is so terrible
but now can i find the reason?
Maybe it will be useful for next article.
And I have confirmed my email now.
my article is http://www.codeproject.com/KB/aspnet/ScriptLoader.aspx
|
|
|
|
|
Ask your question in the Suggestions forum. The staff monitor that, and they should be able to help.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why it was deleted: For any number of reasons, your article was considered to be crap by the people that viewed it in its pre-approval state.
Why No Comments: Many people, such as myself, do not leave comments on articles that they don't deem worthy to be submitted. A small subset of that group (such as myself) will only comment on an article if a) its a complete and utter waste of storage space, or b) the article is almost good enough to approve.
How To Make Your Article Suck
0) Improperly format your article. CodeProject's article wizard does its best to help you along in the process, but in the end, it's still up to you to use the Preview button before hitting the Submit button. Poor formatting is not tolerated at all.
1) Struggling with English. It's really too bad if you're not a native English speaker, but that does not absolve you of the responsibility of posting something the rest of us can read. If you have trouble with English, find someone that doesn't, and have them edit your article for you.
2) Don't put your code blocks inside <pre> tags. This royally screws up an articles appearance.
3) Don't explain the code in detail. We're not as interested in witty banter as much as we are interested in understanding how your code works.
4) Post a partially completed article. NEVER EVER sit down to post an article unless you're prepared to finish it in the same session.
5) Leave in parts of the boilerplate text that the article wizard provides you with by default.
Your article probably met one or more of the items above, thus qualifying it for big time sucking.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|