|
I agree that articles should be written, even if they perhaps cover old ground, or state the obvious to many, or are duplicates of others.
What I feel is missing from the site, is the ability to rate an article on its uniqueness, usefulness and relevance.
I'm seeing far too many articles written these days which simply re-tell old stories, and often not very well. They appear to attract swarms who vote 5 across the board and risk muddying the ability to search for genuinely good, useful articles.
"And when I have understanding of computers, I shall be the Supreme Being!"
|
|
|
|
|
Hello Everyone,
I am using .net 1.1 version of one project.
that code's are below write
String url = "https:
System.Net.HttpWebRequest request = (System.Net.HttpWebRequest)System.Net.WebRequest.Create(url);
string postdata = "DATA=" + xmlval.ToString();
byte[] postdatabytes = System.Text.Encoding.GetEncoding("ISO-8859-9").GetBytes(postdata);
request.Method = "POST";
request.ContentType = "application/x-www-form-urlencoded";
request.ContentLength = postdatabytes.Length;
System.IO.Stream requeststream = request.GetRequestStream();
------------------------
etc....
The error occurs on the last line of the above code with the following error
message:
System.EntryPointNotFoundException: Unable to find an entry point named
EnumerateSecurityPackagesW in DLL security.dll.
bez dotnet 3.5 is working perfect
what is the reason and plz help to me
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why did you feel the need to post this question in no less than 7 different forum?? It's no longer likely your ever going to get an answer to this question seeing as you saw fit to do what everyone hates -> SPAM this site with your question. Pick a single forum most appropriate for your subject, like General Discussions in your case, and post your question ONCE!
|
|
|
|
|
Geeze, that guy hit this forum, too
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
"Not only do you continue to babble nonsense, you can't even correctly remember the nonsense you babbled just minutes ago." - Rob Graham
|
|
|
|
|
...
Blog link to be reinstated at a later date.
|
|
|
|
|
I just read the article series The Life of a Project - Issue Tracking by Matt Gullett, and was very impressed. Unfortunately, it stops at Day 5 with listing the final technical requirements. Matt mentioned having Day 5 posted by the following weekend, but this was back in July of '03. Several others have posted in the comments section requesting to see the rest of the series with no reply since then. I know a lot of us really enjoy the series and find it very insightful. Does anyone know if the rest of the series is up somewhere that we just can't find, or if Matt will get a chance to finish the series? Once again, great series Matt!
Thanks,
Brandon
|
|
|
|
|
Have you tried emailing him? I know which article series you are mentioning and, yes, it is a really good one.
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
"Not only do you continue to babble nonsense, you can't even correctly remember the nonsense you babbled just minutes ago." - Rob Graham
|
|
|
|
|
id like to make a class that will allow people to connect to my machine thru ftp.
I found some code samples that get the job done but I am looking for more of an explination (hence article) on how to create such a service...
|
|
|
|
|
I have submitted a article [Object_Layout_Model] which contains only the document and no code.When i posted the article the link to download is missing.Can anyone of you suggest hwo to resolve the issue?
|
|
|
|
|
syed_babu wrote: When i posted the article the link to download is missing.Can anyone of you suggest hwo to resolve the issue?
Quote Selected Text
This is not the forum for this kind of request. You are better off emailing Chris.
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
"Not only do you continue to babble nonsense, you can't even correctly remember the nonsense you babbled just minutes ago." - Rob Graham
|
|
|
|
|
Id like to learn, if anyone is willing to address the idea, specifically how to hook other processes from c#.
An example would be; how to hook minesweeper, msn, wordpad, word, whatever just the basics on hooking.
|
|
|
|
|
Have you done a search on CP articles about hooking processes[^]?
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
"Not only do you continue to babble nonsense, you can't even correctly remember the nonsense you babbled just minutes ago." - Rob Graham
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah I didn't reall put the AND C# in my query which is probably why I skimmed over these...
|
|
|
|
|
No worries, dude.
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
"Not only do you continue to babble nonsense, you can't even correctly remember the nonsense you babbled just minutes ago." - Rob Graham
|
|
|
|
|
I'd love to know if anyone can show how to emulate Google Chromes multi process apps in VB.Net. Just a simple form1, form2 or apps1, apps2 example maybe with a 'task manager' as well. I love the idea of if apps2/form2 crashes it wont take out the whole apps. Multi threading, MDI's or adding new forms just dont cut it.
Any thoughts??
|
|
|
|
|
While I'm not going to write an article on how to do this, because it's not that hard to do, I will tell you that you do it by loading each form into its own App Domain, so it occupies its own process space. Therefore, if it crashes, it only takes out the individual form. Have a read up on secondary domains to find out how it's done.
|
|
|
|
|
"Do not load assemblies that use Windows Forms components into multiple application domains. Windows Forms was not designed to work in multiple application domains and Microsoft strongly recommends against using this approach."
Forms can't be serialised so cant be loaded as a control into another form in an AppDomain.
So.. how do Google get the dipslay on each tab to be in a seperate process?
|
|
|
|
|
Because they don't use .NET - they use C and Java. So, why did you downvote me for telling you that Google use secondary domains? I'm curious, because you aren't exactly endearing yourself to people who try to help you now are you?
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: downvote me for telling you that Google use secondary domains
That's been fixed
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
"Not only do you continue to babble nonsense, you can't even correctly remember the nonsense you babbled just minutes ago." - Rob Graham
|
|
|
|
|
I have an application that the user may open normally by double clicking its icon on the desktop, but I also want to add a couple of specific 'short-cut' options to the contect menu that should only show when the windows explorer context menu is opened by right clicking the application's icon. Each of these options will start the program, perform a function of the application specified by the menu option that was selected, and then close the application. Because none of these functions involve working on a file or folder, I don't want these options to show on any other file's or folder's context menu.
My idea is to use command line switches to specify the different application functions, I just need to know how to set up the context menu and limit it to just the application's icon.
If it makes any difference, I am using Vista, but I'll want to also set this up in WinXP.
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wrong Title. Hmmm, that's a bit like someone asking for where the bathroom is and you saying not here.
However, I don't think a request for an article that shows how to set up context menu items that only show for a specific program when its icon is right clicked, is off topic to this Forum. But, if you would like offer the forum that you think this request should go under, I'd be interested.
I've already searched for articals and program examples using "context menu" and none of the findings actually do what I'm looking for. They all seem to deal with adding a menu option to the context menu when a folder or file with a certain extention so that you can run your program on that folder or file when the menu item is clicked. What I'm looking for is different, i.e., only show the menu item when a specific program's icon is right clicked.
Thank you
|
|
|
|
|
Member 4169556 wrote: Wrong Title. Hmmm, that's a bit like someone asking for where the bathroom is and you saying not here.
However, I don't think a request for an article that shows how to set up context menu items that only show for a specific program when its icon is right clicked, is off topic to this Forum. But, if you would like offer the forum that you think this request should go under, I'd be interested.
I've already searched for articals and program examples using "context menu" and none of the findings actually do what I'm looking for. They all seem to deal with adding a menu option to the context menu when a folder or file with a certain extention so that you can run your program on that folder or file when the menu item is clicked. What I'm looking for is different, i.e., only show the menu item when a specific program's icon is right clicked.
Maybe I missed something in the OP. Perhaps it was written in Latvian 1Pt font, but there is no mention anywhere that I can see of a request for an article. There was a question on the best way to accomplish the task, but nothing on somebody writing an article on it.
|
|
|
|
|
From your comments, I'm guessing that posting a question that asks for information on a topic in the request for article forum isn't sufficiently clear.
|
|
|
|