|
Does anyone see any reason why Rich OutlookBar in XP and Vista style[^] would need a rework?
I have checked and there are just minimal changes (i.e. size in the pic, &-quot versus " oder Tab versus spaces).
I can't really understand what does these changes bring after 14 years
Or am I missing something?
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure what you're getting at. I sometimes make minor edits to my articles but can now publish them without moderation. But I only check the "Mark article as updated?" box if the article or its code has been meaningfully revised. Otherwise it would put the article on the front page for no reason, which is abusive. If a revised article that requires moderation is always treated as if it should go onto the front page, I'd call that a site defect rather than deliberate abuse by its author.
|
|
|
|
|
Greg Utas wrote: But I only check the "Mark article as updated?" box if the article or its code has been meaningfully revised.... If a revised article that requires moderation is always treated as if it should go onto the front page, I'd call that a site defect rather than deliberate abuse by its author.
Fair enough...
Greg Utas wrote: Otherwise it would put the article on the front page for no reason, which is abusive.
What more or less was my question
But I am not going to report it, just wanted to know if I am missing something or not, because I can't find any good reason for those minimal changes done, and even less after 14 years without touching.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Codeproject editor,
C++: Windows Toast Notification
Some text is squashed together but is correct when viewed in the article editor. The formatting must have gone wrong during automatic parsing/transforming/preparation for publishing.
Even my profile description at the bottom is in the red code tag (probably caused by an unclosed <code> tag)
Can you take a look?
Edit: found another article with the same problem: Making HTTP REST Request in C++
modified 30-Mar-21 1:35am.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks very much for the report. There was an error with the article editor that has now been fixed.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Hello, I added my company's RSS feed yesterday as a Technical Blog but the first article was reported as spam and the account was closed. In reviewing the submission rules, I understand that the article contained callouts to the tool and therefore should not have been submitted. My apologies for this.
Going forward, I would like to only submit the most technical articles from our blog - some of our articles are career advice or thought leadership - and I will remove any CTAs or free download prompts.
When adding the blog feed again the prompt says "Feed already added, contact us." which I am doing here. Can someone help me resubmit the RSS feed? Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Everett,
I'd be happy to help with this. First could I look at some examples from your blog, and could you please let me know the CodeProject account that added the blog to our site?
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks very much for that. Would you be willing to have all links and references to Arctype removed from your posts when they are published on CodeProject?
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Yes! We definitely want to follow the rules of the forum. I think there's an original link that is shown at the bottom of the articles and that should be just fine!
|
|
|
|
|
|
I see that, okay that is definitely acceptable! Thank you for taking the time to look at this.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Everett. I have restored the account you were sharing the blog from. I recommend as soon as our aggregator pulls in your blog entries, that you go in and edit out the links and mentions of Arctype as soon as possible (as shown here):
Code Project Technical Blog FAQ[^]
Because the account has been flagged once, as soon as the members see the blog post with the links in it, they will flag the account again and remove it. If I happen to catch it before you do, I will edit out the links and mentions.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Got it, really appreciate the advice. We'll move fast on editing these.
|
|
|
|
|
I get a virus warning when I try to download DriveDetector_demo.zip WHY?
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry for the delay, I just saw your message right now.
It would not be the first time that some antivirus get a false positive with the annexed items of an article. I am not saying you can trust the download blindly. It is good that you tell about this issue, but would be better if you post a link to the article, if not the admins won't be able to check it.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
In the message pinned at the top of this forum, two of the links are broken:
CodeProject Article FAQ
A Guide to Writing Articles for CodeProject
When you click them, you get the "there is no page" page.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the catch! All fixed.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Hi CP
I've written a tool to count the number of times unique IP addresses occur in zipped raw access logs and I'd like to share it with CP but can't work out where best to post it.
I wrote it to quickly identify aggressive bots on my website so I can block them by IP address.
|
|
|
|
|
I would say an article with a good explanation and the source code to download would be the best option.
About sections... I think it could be in:
If it works online
- Web Development >> Applications and Tools
or
- Web Development >> Trace and Logs
or if it works offline (you download the logs and work locally)
- Desktop Development >> Miscelaneous
or
- General programming >> Internet / Network
Not sure if that is what you asked though 
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Thx for your suggestions Nelek.
|
|
|
|
|
I think Nelek's suggestions are good. If when it comes time to post and you're still not sure, just fire me an email (sean@codeproject.com) and I'll be happy to place it for you.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Sean
I decided to go with jeron1's suggestion of starting in the 'Free Tools' forum but I'm unable to post a screenshot there as I can here...
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe Free Tools Discussion Boards[^] if you are not looking to create an article.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
