|
I tried that and it still returns the length of the file as 1241156 instead of 151387. The code looks something like this:
CFileFind Finder;
Finder.FindFile(Filename);
Finder.FindNextFile();
double size=Finder.GetLength();
modified 12-Jul-20 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
First verify that FindFile returns non-zero.
non-zero indicates success.
If FindFile() fails then FindNextFile will not work properly. Naturally GetLength() will also return abnormal values.
So chk and see if FindFile returns a non-zero value.
Nish
Nish was here, now Nish has gone;
He left his soul, to turn you on;
Those who knew Nish, knew him well;
Those who didn't, can go to hell.
I like to ![Jig | [Dance]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/jig.gif) on the Code Project
Sonork ID 100.9786 voidmain
www.busterboy.org
|
|
|
|
|
FindFile returns successful, but FindNextFile() will fail since I've given it the exact file to find.
modified 12-Jul-20 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I would like to implement some form of IPC, however I can't decide which approach to take..?
I am considering ReadProcessMemory etc...But wouldn't this be more work than nessecary...?
Could the same, but easier be accomplished with file mapping...?
It's to my understanding that ReadProcessmemory would only be required if the differeing applications didn't (at design) have the need to communicate. ReadProcessMem... could then be used to read memory into the desired process and acted on accordingly.
How much work would it be to implement File mapping for both sides, compared to ReadProcessMemory...?
Any suggestions...? ReadProcess could cause page faults huh...if used incorrectly..
Thanx
"An expert is someone who has made all the mistakes in his or her field" - Niels Bohr
|
|
|
|
|
Look at shared sections. This will allow 2 or more processes to access this IPC section.
Tim Smith
Descartes Systems Sciences, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
I'll check it out.
Thanx
"An expert is someone who has made all the mistakes in his or her field" - Niels Bohr
|
|
|
|
|
I have a form view (inside Leo Moll's Property Sheet View) with controls in it. When I resize the window I get screen flicker in a major way.
Since I do not draw the controls, I can overwrite the OnDraw function. Where should I add my double buffering? Or is there another way?
Thank You
XP
|
|
|
|
|
Have you tried using Keith Rule's CMemDC class?
Jon Sagara
What about ![Green Alien | [Alien]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/alien.gif) ?
Sonork ID: 100.9999 jonsagara
|
|
|
|
|
I can't figure out where to but in this case.
|
|
|
|
|
Set the dialog control to clipchildren. Then when it paints, it will not erase the controls.
Also, if a control is flickering that doesn't have children and you will always repaint the control fully, then disable WM_ERASEBKGRD.
Tim Smith
Descartes Systems Sciences, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
I am using Microsoft Vision SDK. I need to be able to open multiple bitmaps at onces, work on all of them and store the results as a txt file. Any ideas on how to cycle through all of the bitmaps opened and have a txt open/save dialog in addition to the bitmap one?
Your answer is greatly appreciated.
Ali Mustafa
ali@maiinc.com
|
|
|
|
|
I've viewed the related articles on CP about CPU Useage and have only concluded that ntQueryPerfomanceCounter..?(i think) Is the only way to return CPU useage.
I don't suppose this works(or there exists a workaround) for WIN98...???
Thanx a bundle!
"An expert is someone who has made all the mistakes in his or her field" - Niels Bohr
|
|
|
|
|
As far as I know, QueryPerfomanceCounter is the only way to obtain current CPU usage and according to the docs, it is compatable with W95 and W98. I believe there are few libraries around here that encapulate it. WFC is one.
|
|
|
|
|
Funny cuz I was just on CodeGuru and read a message thread with your name in it. I'll assume it was you, because the disscussion "CPU Usage".
Actually what i really wanted was CPU usage of each process.
I'm already using the RDTSC to perform code profiling and was curious if there was a way to return process usage (proportional to rest of system) as well. Turns out (so far anyway) that this would require a whole lot more work then i'm ready to put forth.
I'm assuming you'd have to count the clocks of each process at each task switch...?
In anycase, to much homework for me right now...
Thanx
"An expert is someone who has made all the mistakes in his or her field" - Niels Bohr
|
|
|
|
|
HockeyDude wrote:
Funny cuz I was just on CodeGuru
You bad bad boy!!!!
LOLOLOL 
Nish
Sonork ID 100.9786 voidmain
www.busterboy.org
If you don't find me on CP, I'll be at Bob's HungOut
|
|
|
|
|
I much prefer codeproject.
It has a far more pleasant interface, cooler colors and that little martian dude.
"An expert is someone who has made all the mistakes in his or her field" - Niels Bohr
|
|
|
|
|
Well, it wasn't me writing because I haven't been there in ages. Was it referring to one of my articles ? I am not sure if they even have them any more. Could you point me to the thread ? I am curious now.
|
|
|
|
|
I believe is was someone referring to you. I dunno i'm uncertain myself.
I just thought it ironic that while lookin for info on process usage that an thread on CodeGuru had Rick York, then 5 secs later when I checked for messages...lo and behold theres your name.
I'll try and locate the thread but i can't make any promises. I found it originally through a google, so ican't exactly retrace my foot steps...
Ciao
"An expert is someone who has made all the mistakes in his or her field" - Niels Bohr
|
|
|
|
|
That is odd !
I did a search at Google myself and found some odd things. FWIW, codeguru does still have all my articles but they don't seem to be linked to any more. Also, I am from Oregon and the Perry Mason's cases page is mine.
I did find one VERY annoying thing - some asian site has one of my articles posted with their copyright. I would let them know what I think about this but I couldn't find a place to do it.
My jokes page
|
|
|
|
|
Rick York wrote:
I did find one VERY annoying thing - some asian site has one of my articles posted with their copyright.
Could you not do a whois on the domain name..?
Cheers
"An expert is someone who has made all the mistakes in his or her field" - Niels Bohr
|
|
|
|
|
Denial! That's what they all do.
Not guilty, they plead.
But Buster ain't gonna be happy with that.
I need evidence man, solid proof.
Now!
Ladies and gentlemen, this is the CP security force takin' over from here on.
nish
Sonork ID 100.9786 voidmain
www.busterboy.org
If you don't find me on CP, I'll be at Bob's HungOut
|
|
|
|
|
Oh yeah ?
Show me the evidence that I was there buster.
Then we'll talk.
|
|
|
|
|
I have been searching for a 'SDI tab view' (something similar to Excel tabs, either at the top or the bottom of the window) for a while now. I found some on the Code Project website, but these are either MDI or can't resize.
Can anybody tell me, where I can find something like that?
Thank You
XP
|
|
|
|
|
By SDI you mean all views point to the same document ? Surely it would be trivial downgrade the code on CP to work that way ?
Personally, I think I'd use a formview, and a tabctrl if I wanted one document, and many selectable views.
Christian
I have come to clean zee pooollll. - Michael Martin Dec 30, 2001
Picture the daffodil. And while you do that, I'll be over here going through your stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
Does a tabctrl work on a view? I thought it will only work on a dialog?
LP
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
