|
and I have inserted a web browser ActiveX control(but not htmlview) in my program.thanks again.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
I have a friend that know Java ...
I heard that he can write program with the Internet Explorer view ...
I mean he can write program without using any dialog or ... inside the Internet Explorer window, first i wanna know is it right ?
and in last HOW ?
My month article: Game programming by DirectX by Lan Mader.
Please visit in: www.geocities.com/hadi_rezaie/index.html
Hadi Rezaie
|
|
|
|
|
he probably meant he wrote an applet
Nish
|
|
|
|
|
Can i write program like this Java program ?(with MFC)
My month article: Game programming by DirectX by Lan Mader.
Please visit in: www.geocities.com/hadi_rezaie/index.html
Hadi Rezaie
|
|
|
|
|
Guess you could try writing an ActiveX control
Or perhaps you might want to look into HTA
Nish
|
|
|
|
|
Do you mean an HTA, Hypertext Application? You can write an application that makes use of IE without displaying the IE toolbar, address bar, etc. If you are not familiar with this try changing the extention of a page from htm, or html, to hta and open it.
|
|
|
|
|
I searched this forum and found articles on taking application to full scrren.
I applied the way MSDN article ID:Q164162 specified. The problem I get a border when the window goes fullscreen. Is there a way to remove that border.
Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
Resize the window so the border is outside it. You can use GetSystemMetrics (SM_CXBORDER, SM_CYBORDER and SM_CYCAPTION to find out the size of those parts of the window you want to hide.
Christian
After all, there's nothing wrong with an elite as long as I'm allowed to be part of it!! - Mike Burston Oct 23, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
- TLS means thread local storage. MSDN says, we can use Dll to initialize TLS.
- I am puzzled at this point. I think TLS is a part of thread and Dll is not a part of thread. Why we should use Dll to initialize the TLS?
Do we use TLS in our Dll?
- I am a beginner of Dll and I have never used TLs before. So my question maybe stupid.
- Can you help? Or show me an example?
Regards,
Maer
|
|
|
|
|
You can use TLS in a DLL. To use TLS you have to call TlsXXX Win32 API functions (like TlsAlloc, TlsFree) --or-- use __declspec(thread) modifier (VC6 only). However, if your DLL is going to be loaded via explicit call to LoadLibrary, you can't use __declspec(thread), only TlsXXX.
Tomasz Sowinski -- http://www.shooltz.com
|
|
|
|
|
- Thanks for your reply pal!
- I still have a question. I think Dll can use its own local variable. Why should Dll use a storage in the thread? What is the advantage of TLS?
- Can you help?
- Regards,
Maer
|
|
|
|
|
- How to make the MSFlexGrid Control be able to input data in Visual C++? Are there any articles or posts?
- Can you help?
Regards,
Maer
|
|
|
|
|
See this article in MSDN
EditGrid.exe: Edit Cells in MSFlexGrid ActiveX Control
I hope that this is all u r looking for. I have modified this article to even dynamically show lists on Grids.
|
|
|
|
|
- Thanks for your reply pal!
- But I can not find the topic in my MSDN. Is the topic "EditGrid.exe: Edit Cells in MSFlexGrid ActiveX Control"?
My MSDN is January 2001 version.
- Can you tell me where can I find the article? From MSDN and from the web are also OK.
- Regards,
Maer
|
|
|
|
|
It was in there two years ago when I used MSFlexGrid, and it's in my July 2001 edition MSDN. Have you installed it all ?
FWIW I use Chris Maunders grid control now, it smokes MSFlexGrid.
Christian
After all, there's nothing wrong with an elite as long as I'm allowed to be part of it!! - Mike Burston Oct 23, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
- Thanks pal!
- You must be an experienced programmer, I thought. Can you show me some articles about the topic?
- My MSDN is January 2001, it is older than yours.
- Regards,
Maer
|
|
|
|
|
The only article I ever read was the one in question, if you get stuck I'm happy to dig up my backup CD's and find some code for you.
Like I said, my current MSDN is newer than yours AND when I needed the info my MSDN was much older, therefore unless it was taken out and put back in, it must be in your MSDN as well.
Christian
After all, there's nothing wrong with an elite as long as I'm allowed to be part of it!! - Mike Burston Oct 23, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
- Thanks my pal!
- I have found the article you mentioned under your directions.
- Regards,
Maer
|
|
|
|
|
The Article is a Knowledge Base article with the ID: Q196833
I am sure it is in the MSDN.
|
|
|
|
|
- Thanks pal!
- If I have further questions, I will contact you.
- Have a nice day,
Maer
|
|
|
|
|
I am building my first MFC application which has MFC statically linked. A colleague says that I am not allowed to release a debug version of this to machines in the organisation that don't have a VC++ licence. He has pointed to an article in MSDN that says "..Note that debug versions of an
application are not redistributable and that none of the debug versions of various Visual C++ dynamic-link libraries (DLLs) are redistributable." Can anyone confirm my colleagues view and say why Microsoft are bothered about what version of my app I distribute?
|
|
|
|
|
Why on earth would you *want* to release a debug version - it is going to be bigger and slower than a release version.
Christian
After all, there's nothing wrong with an elite as long as I'm allowed to be part of it!! - Mike Burston Oct 23, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
The increased size and the performance hit haven't been issues to date. The user machines are over-spec'd. They'd probably run XP without blinking...
I've used assert to stop the program with a hint, when "that should never happen" happens. To date typically this is because rogue data is coming in from another system. I rather not re-invent that wheel if I can get away with it
|
|
|
|
|
Either way, it is wrong in my opinion to release crippled code just because the system can handle it. The debug version is different in many ways, and designed for debugging, not for release.
What wheel do you not want to reinvent, assert ? It's just a macro, have a look at it, it is about five minutes work. Your code should handle the case of rogue data, that's what programming for the real world is all about. It should do it in a prettier way for the end user than an assert message, you should assert liberally to help you debug and release the product when the debug version gives no asserts because everything is being dealt with correctly.
Christian
After all, there's nothing wrong with an elite as long as I'm allowed to be part of it!! - Mike Burston Oct 23, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
For debug release a lot of DLL's will be required and debugging errors can pop up after distribution.
Release is the best option for distributing the appl. It is smaller and requires less DLL's of MFC.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
