|
CPMRU turned ON? 
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
|
|
|
|
|
I dont know why he deleted his reply,but anyway I dont think I can preservation CPRMU 
Add
I dont know why I think they are man.
/Add
|
|
|
|
|
The same guy asked for help on embedding a keylogger executable inside another one...
[added]
And now he's active member of the leckey's CP offenders list [^]
[/added]
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
|
|
|
|
|
|
Definitely (I'm afraid to argue about with leckey).
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
|
|
|
|
|
Reading your further messages, I think there is some confusion.
An administrator can set policy to disable regedit. In which case, that has no effect on any program you write using the Reg API functions.
If the permissions on a key have been so that you can't access them, then the answer is to ask someone in authority nicely to fix that. If you don't give them a good reason, tough.
If you have the authority, then you can use REGEDT32.EXE to play with permissions on registry keys. It looks similar to regedit, but is a lot more powerful (and dangerous!).
If you want to change the permissions on a key programmitcally, then that is a complex job, involved SIDs, and all sorts of things I feel only pertially qualified to discuss.
Also, you need permission on a parent key to do that - if you don't, the answer goes back to "tough".
Iain.
Plz sir... CPallini CPallini abuz drugz, plz plz help urgent.
|
|
|
|
|
See here http://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/View.aspx?fid=1647&msg=2548986[^]
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
|
|
|
|
|
I'm glad my answer was a long version of "tough" then!
Iain.
Plz sir... CPallini CPallini abuz drugz, plz plz help urgent.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I have regitsred key under AllSystemObjects in registry for context menu. It is working fine for all files and folders But when I right click on .lnk file, my menu option is coming twice.
How can I restrict it to come once.
|
|
|
|
|
Pther,
I'll give you credit for persistence! I'm impressed you found a better registry key than '*' for your shortcut handler - I failed. Mind you, you weren't paying me for an answer...
I'd strongly recommend sysinternals regmon program for sorting out any issues with the registry.
Is you handler called twice? I'm guessing you still have the * key setup - so are you called once for the lnk file, and once for the file the lnk points to?
The debugger should help you. If I haven't already told you, Michael Dunn's excellent shell series has information on debugger extension handlers in its first (or second) article.
First find out *why* you're getting two calls, then worry about "fixing" it. Maybe you want to give slightly different menu optiosn if it's a lnk file? Check the path you're being given to make sure both times are the same? If they're not, filter on that... Etc.
Iain.
Plz sir... CPallini CPallini abuz drugz, plz plz help urgent.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I have a thread in my application having a pipe (Created in Blocking Mode) which waits for the client to write to it.
Once pipe is read the post a message with the read pointer casted to Wparam to the main appication and waits for the next read.
Now the problem Iam facing is that by the time the application process the message the pipe is again read , so the memory gets overwritten.
Can anyone let me know how to overcome this problem?
|
|
|
|
|
krishnan.s wrote: Can anyone let me know how to overcome this problem?
Don't overwrite your memory?
Seriously. You read from a pipe into a section of ram that you've allocated. Try allocating a fresh chunk each time, post a message to some other part of your process with the pointer to that memory as (eg) lParam, then delete the message in that part.
If you use a buffer allocated on the stack (ie, inline in your procedure), and then keep reading on top of it, then you've volunteered for your own problem.
I would also worry that if you're processing messages slower than they're arriving then you may get problems. If it's just the occasional one, and most are fast, then you're fine.
Iain.
Plz sir... CPallini CPallini abuz drugz, plz plz help urgent.
|
|
|
|
|
I tried creating memory in heap and deleting in my message handler , but it throws exception as memory was created in different thread and iam trying to delete it in my main application .
|
|
|
|
|
OK, sounds like you have the right idea though.
I'd have to do a bit of research (ie, *you'll* have to do a bit of research), but there's more ways of dynamically allocating chunks of memory that new/delete. There's also alloc/free, GlobalAlloc/GlobalFree(?)(though that's over the top, and lastly but probably a goodie - CoGetMalloc/IMalloc.
All sorts of different ways, and I'm sure most are thread safe.
If you're doing this LOTS of timesm for a lonf time, then the memory churn could cause you problems. Are your packets a relatively constant length? You could keep a large array of them, mark them as free / in use, and so on, but that becomes very hard and only useful if you *really* have to.
Iain.
Plz sir... CPallini CPallini abuz drugz, plz plz help urgent.
modified on Tuesday, May 13, 2008 4:04 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Please help me get rid of the following Error.
Initializelog.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol "class std::basic_string<char,struct std::char_traits<char="">,class std::allocator<char> > message" (?message@@3V?$basic_string@DU?$char_traits@D@std@@V?$allocator@D@2@@std@@A)
Logger.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol "class std::basic_string<char,struct std::char_traits<char="">,class std::allocator<char> > __cdecl log(class std::basic_string<char,struct std::char_traits<char="">,class std::allocator<char> >)" (?l
og@@YA?AV?$basic_string@DU?$char_traits@D@std@@V?$allocator@D@2@@std@@V12@@Z)
Debug/test_dll_log.exe : fatal error LNK1120: 2 unresolved externals
Thanks..
|
|
|
|
|
Kindly let me know how can I get rid of the above error...
|
|
|
|
|
See here and here.
"Love people and use things, not love things and use people." - Unknown
"To have a respect for ourselves guides our morals; to have deference for others governs our manners." - Laurence Sterne
|
|
|
|
|
pl_kode wrote: Initializelog.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol "class std::basic_string,class std::allocator > message" (?message@@3V?$basic_string@DU?$char_traits@D@std@@V?$allocator@D@2@@std@@A)
You somehow managed to get the symbol name wrong. I manually de-mangled the symbol and came up with the following:
class std::basic_string<char,struct std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> > message
pl_kode wrote: Logger.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol "class std::basic_string,class std::allocator > __cdecl log(class std::basic_string,class std::allocator >" (?l
og@@YA?AV?$basic_string@DU?$char_traits@D@std@@V?$allocator@D@2@@std@@V12@@Z)
Again, the symbol name is wrong here, it should read as follows:
class std::basic_string<char,struct std::char_traits<char>,
class std::allocator<char> > __cdecl log(class std::basic_string<char,
struct std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> > )
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
I have left with these errors when compiling my code:
"MyBrowser.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol __imp___stricoll referenced in function "int __cdecl b_compare(struct b_sort_s *,struct b_sort_s *)" (?b_compare@@YAHPAUb_sort_s@@0@Z)
MyBrowser.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol __imp__div referenced in function "public: virtual void __thiscall CMyBrowser:SurprisenPrint(class CDC *,struct CPrintInfo *)" (?OnPrint@CMyBrowser@@UAEXPAVCDC@@PAUCPrintInfo@@@Z)
MyBrowser.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol __imp__atof referenced in function "public: class ATL::CStringT<char,class strtraitmfc_dll<char,class="" atl::chtraitscrt<char=""> > > __thiscall CMyBrowser::GetColumnCount(int,int)" (?GetColumnCount@CMyBrowser@@QAE?AV?$CStringT@DV?$StrTraitMFC_DLL@DV?$ChTraitsCRT@D@ATL@@@@@ATL@@HH@Z)"
So the problems are with '_stricoll', 'div' and 'atof' in my code, to be more specific:
- suma += atof(GetItemText(i,nCol));
- res=_stricoll( (char*)arg1->string[j], (char*)arg2->string[j] );
- div_t div_result = div( pInfo->m_nCurPage-1, m_PageHorz+1 );
I searched for this functions, but could not find solution.
My project is in VC++2008 MFC and is 'Multi-threaded Debug DLL (/MDd)'
Any idea on this?
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Do you have the linker switch Ignore All Default Libraries (i.e. /NODEFAULTLIB) ON?
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
|
|
|
|
|
my 'Ignore all default libraries' is set to NO
|
|
|
|
|
josip cagalj wrote: Any idea on this?
See here.
"Love people and use things, not love things and use people." - Unknown
"To have a respect for ourselves guides our morals; to have deference for others governs our manners." - Laurence Sterne
|
|
|
|
|
Can anyone please tell me how to resolve these linker errors?
1 . "Error 1 error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol _CLSID_MMCVersionInfo"
2 . "Error 2 error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol _IID_IMMCVersionInfo"
Thanks,
Mushq
|
|
|
|
|
#pragma comment (lib, "Mmc.lib")
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks a millions.
but can you please explain that, actually when I was including "Mmc.lib" in "Project Settings"->Linker->"Additional Dependencies", this resolved the error related IID _MMCVersionInfo but it was creating another linker error i.e. "error LNK2005: "public: __thiscall AFX_MAINTAIN_STATE2::~AFX_MAINTAIN_STATE2(void)" (??1AFX_MAINTAIN_STATE2@@QAE@XZ) already defined in Mmc.lib(apimfc.obj) nafxcwd.lib"
Regards,
Mushq
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
