|
Could you please use a more meaningful post title. This forum is C#, so we already know the language you are dealing with. Note however, that your question would have been more suitable in the General Questions forum because it isn't language specific.
|
|
|
|
|
Try googling it and use a more meaningful subject line.
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
any body pls tell me how to add checkbox in DataGridView column header?
quick response highly appriciated.
Ramana
|
|
|
|
|
Their is No way to add check box on a header.
But What I suppose you want to give a Check box on header that and on selection of that all the checkboxes of remaining rows are automatically selected right...?
If it is true then do this...
1. Place a check box control on a form.
2. Remove its text and set its position to the column header.
3. On Checked Change event of it write this
<br />
for (int cnt = 0; cnt <= DataGridView1.Rows.Count - 1; cnt++)<br />
{<br />
DataGridView.Rows[cnt].Cells["ColSelect"].Value = true;<br />
}<br />
Regards
Pankaj Joshi
If you want to shape your dreams into reality, please wake-up...
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All,
TO use pointers ,I have tried to make the code Unsafe.but there is still error..The code is given below..
public unsafe class node
{
//attributes.......
private string TableName;
private node *Next;
private ArrayList *ColName;
public node()
{
Next = null;
TableName = null;
ColName = null;
}
}
Error "Cannot take the address of, get the size of, or declare a pointer to a managed type"
Regards,
chanzeb chaudhary.
|
|
|
|
|
correct, you can't.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
"also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )
|
|
|
|
|
in C# pointers are applicable to value types only. Example: pixel bytes inside a Bitmap,
but not the whole Bitmap.
|
|
|
|
|
I would like to make a "dumb" conversion factory, to convert one type to another (call them types A and B). To perform this action, I require that I can construct the return type with a default constructor. I will then take all the public read/write properties of both A and B, compare them, then copy the matching ones over. However, I want this to be a generic operation, that can convert between any two classes. Therefore, I am attempting to do the following:
public class AbstractBase<T, U> where T : AbstractBase<T, U> {
public static implicit operator T(U other) {
T rval = new T();
foreach (PropertyInfo Upi in typeof(U).GetProperties()) {
PropertyInfo Tpi = typeof(T).GetProperty(Upi.Name, Upi.PropertyType);
if (Tpi != null && Tpi.CanWrite && Upi.CanRead
&& Upi.GetIndexParameters().Length == 0)
Tpi.SetValue(rval, Upi.GetValue(other, null), null);
}
return rval;
}
public static implicit operator U(T other) {
U rval = new U();
foreach (PropertyInfo Tpi in typeof(T).GetProperties()) {
PropertyInfo Upi = typeof(U).GetProperty(Tpi.Name, Tpi.PropertyType);
if (Upi != null && Upi.CanWrite && Tpi.CanRead
&& Tpi.GetIndexParameters().Length == 0)
Upi.SetValue(rval, Tpi.GetValue(other, null), null);
}
return rval;
}
} And then declare a user to this class as follows:
public class myClass : AbstractBase<myClass, otherClass> { ... } I know that one of the types passed in, say T, implements AbstractBase<T, U>, so I thought that I could do the above, since my conversion is from one type that inherits from this class to some other unknown type. However, I get the error that I can only convert between types related to the class. Does anyone know a way around this so I can use the above code without retyping it in every single class (like myClass in the above example) where I need this functionality? Thanks,
Sounds like somebody's got a case of the Mondays
-Jeff
|
|
|
|
|
I suspect that you need to put a new() constraint in
public class AbstractBase<T, U> where T : AbstractBase<T, U> new()
where U : class, new()
|
|
|
|
|
My current solution is to include these methods in a static utility class as template methods, then call them from within the class that will use them to convert to/from it's type. That way, I only need one definition as follows:
public static class Helper {
public static T Convert<T, U>(U other) where T : new() {
}
}
Sounds like somebody's got a case of the Mondays
-Jeff
|
|
|
|
|
I had to write a validation function for some data being read from an app.config. The point of the validation was to ensure that the value was a power of 2 and within a certain range (4k - 4mb). This is how I did it:
private bool IsPowerOfTwo(int numeric, int min, int max)
{
bool valid = false;
if (numeric >= min && numeric <= max && numeric % 2 == 0)
{
int pow2 = min;
while (pow2 <= max && !valid)
{
valid = ((pow2 *= 2) == numeric);
}
}
return valid;
}
Assume that the min and max values are valid powers of 2. I passed in the values 4096 for min, and 4194304 for max).
How would you do it?
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
I'd make sure there was only one '1' in the binary representation of the number.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
"also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )
|
|
|
|
|
Hi John, the following test applies to signed integers and returns true if and only if the
value is either zero, a positive power of 2, or the minimum value (which equals the negative
of a power of 2); it basically checks that there are either zero or one bits set:
(x & -x)==x
It relies on the fact that -x, when looking from right to left, preserves all the low-end zeroes
of x, as well as one low-end one, and flips all the other bits.
|
|
|
|
|
Pretty nifty, I must say
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
|
Found this nifty little function as part of the excellent AForge library [^]
public static bool IsPowerOf2(int x)
{
return (x & (x - 1)) == 0;
}
|
|
|
|
|
yep, that's mathematically equivalent to mine. It too calls zero a power of two.
PS: how is the memory?
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: PS: how is the memory?
Haven't solved it yet. We are profiling it over several days to get a better picture. Will let you know what happens.
|
|
|
|
|
An alternative approach could be:
private static bool IsPowerOf2(double number)
{
double value = Math.Log(number, 2);
return value == Convert.ToDouble(Convert.ToInt32(value));
}
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
i have added one checkbox to my datagridview..
i want to select the checkbox....
after selecting the check box i need to get the whole row details of that perticular checked row..
DataGridViewCheckBoxColumn ckb = new DataGridViewCheckBoxColumn();
ckb.Name = "Checkbox";
ckb.HeaderText = "Select";
dataGridView1.Columns.Insert(0, ckb);
how do i select and deselect the checkbox check options...
please reply me ASAP
|
|
|
|
|
<br />
for (int cnt = 0; cnt <= DataGridView1.Rows.Count - 1; cnt++)<br />
{<br />
DataGridView.Rows[cnt].Cells["ColSelect"].Value = true;<br />
}<br />
1. Where ColSelect is your column name.
2. If you want to de-select just write false instead of true.
3. And if you want to know which row is checked and which is not then
<br />
for (int index = DataGridView1.Rows.Count - 1; index >= 0; index--)<br />
{<br />
if (Convert.ToBoolean(DataGridView1.Rows[index].Cells[0].Value))<br />
{<br />
"Selected"<br />
}<br />
else<br />
{<br />
"Not Selected"<br />
}<br />
}
<br />
:-D <br />
<br />
Regards
Pankaj Joshi
If you want to shape your dreams into reality, please wake-up...
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I am writing my first control and would like to create an event so the form the control is sitting on can pick up user activity in the control.
How can I do this?
Thanks in advance.
Stephen
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have a MDI container, inside of it I have a child form that is maximized. If I have a second form created and displayed by the first form that is maximized (with its MdiParent property set properly) the second form will also be maximized. Is there anyway to override this behavior? I know I can use ShowDialog, but I don't want it to be a dialog I want it to be a normal, nonmaximized window. The property on the form is set to Normal and I event do a WindowState = FormWindowState.Normal in the constructor, but it still comes as maximized.
Any suggestions?
|
|
|
|
|
eggsovereasy wrote: Is there anyway to override this behavior?
No. All the MDI child forms are treated the same. If one is maximized, they all are. If one is "normal", they all are.
|
|
|
|
|
Disappointing
Thank you for the reply though, I guess I will try and make something work with ShowDialog().
|
|
|
|