|
i'm trying to modify this article[^] and trying to use it on panel and button but both aint working.
I want to hide the entire form, just controls should appear with their images. I tried to use Transparent Key but as usual it only works good with gif format because it support boolean for alpha.
While in png alpha can be 0-255
is it better idea to use many forms or is there anyway to use it on panel and button ?
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKSQXUFYK[M`UKs*$GwU#(QDXBER@CBN%
Rs0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-iTV.C\y<pjxsg-b$f4ia>
--------------------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
I don't have an answer to your question but your sig challenge has been solved. I won't post the contents out of fairness to others but will comment, You did what, to whose dog, for how many jelly beans and now he can't walk straight?
Need software developed? Offering C# development all over the United States, ERL GLOBAL, Inc is the only call you will have to make.
If you don't ask questions the answers won't stand in your way.
Most of this sig is for Google, not ego.
|
|
|
|
|
nope, absolutely wrong...
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKSQXUFYK[M`UKs*$GwU#(QDXBER@CBN%
Rs0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-iTV.C\y<pjxsg-b$f4ia>
--------------------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
I want to Search Yahoo group member Email Id.
and post Message to all member in Dot net windows application .
Please Help Me
Thanks
<div class="ForumMod">modified on Friday, January 23, 2009 3:58 AM</div>
|
|
|
|
|
A few seconds search on Yahoo (suprisingly) shows loads of info on using the yahoo groups api. Have you tried there?
Bob
Ashfield Consultants Ltd
Proud to be a 2009 Code Project MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Yaar pura question to padh liya karo....
Don't walk as if u rule the world,walk as if u don't care who tha Hell rules the world ...
|
|
|
|
|
inzibharti wrote: Yaar pura question to padh liya karo....
Bob
Ashfield Consultants Ltd
Proud to be a 2009 Code Project MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Hai friends,
In my small application iam retrieving the links stored in the IE's favorites folder and write to .doc file. i want to set hyperlink to each of them. Please help me.
Regards,
DJ
|
|
|
|
|
use link label. Did you use it.
|
|
|
|
|
i dont know how to use it..
|
|
|
|
|
|
I can write hex numbers as 0x which range from 0x0 to 0xF
How can I write octa numbers which range from 0 to 7 (Adding 1 to 7 should result 10)
I could do this in C.
Sandeep Bhutani
|
|
|
|
|
Octal number must begin with 0.
For example, 017 is a value 15.
«_Superman_»
|
|
|
|
|
This did not work. I tried int i=010 which should be equal to 8 but was 10.
I also tested in Debug window but 0 prefix has no effect
Sandeep Bhutani
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, I gave you the C/C++ solution.
In C# you can use Convert.ToInt32(10.ToString(), 8)
Here 10 is the octal number and 8 represents the base (Octal).
«_Superman_»
|
|
|
|
|
Ew, but yeah it may come to that. There's still gotta be a better way.
|
|
|
|
|
It seems that the word "octal" doesn't appear anywhere in the C# spec.
|
|
|
|
|
there are no "binary" or "hex" leywords either, but that doesn't stop us from using whatever we want as a number base.
|
|
|
|
|
As a matter of fact, I use beer as number base.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
That won't cut it. Nobody would trust you dealing with beer-based numbers.
The way I know you, you would soon prove infinity does not exist.
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, I'm trying to reach infinity, but......... hic! ........... another one, plz plz!
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
Absolutely, great for bubble sorts without the expense that champagne incurs or the sugary-sweetness of cola.
|
|
|
|
|
No, but the words appear in the spec, as in:
binary-operator-declarator:
type operator overloadable-binary-operator ( type identifier , type identifier )
decimal-integer-literal:
decimal-digits integer-type-suffixopt
hexadecimal-integer-literal:
0x hex-digits integer-type-suffixopt
0X hex-digits integer-type-suffixopt
Not so for octal.
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, binary operators is a misnomer IMO; it really are bit-level operators meaning all the bits have independent meaning and behavior, there is no link to base 2 there.
I would not mind C# supporting binary and octal literals, hence also a convention to indicate those bases; and support for it in TryParse and ToString.
However I would very rarely use it; octal is thing of the past; some instruction sets got described in octal (e.g. PDP8 and PDP11), which looked OK at the time mainly because they had 8 registers so it was a signle digit that chose the register).
Binary notation tends to lack compactness; with a comma every 4 bits, an Int32 would take 39 characters.
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: binary operators
... operate on two operands. You know that.
Luc Pattyn wrote: supporting binary and octal literals
The C way of indicating octal literals is problematic. C# leaves it out, but that means that code copied from C will be broken with no alert.
I expect 0o10 would be better, with a warning if someone uses a capital O rather than a lowercase o , as with the l to indicate long.
Luc Pattyn wrote: octal is thing of the past
Yes, the only time I need octal is for OpenVMS UICs, and I still do see why they have to be done in octal.
Luc Pattyn wrote: Binary notation tends to lack compactness
Yeah, gimme Base-64 any day!
|
|
|
|