|
Nice one
|
|
|
|
|
hi
i was posted how to merge 2 exe and make 1 exe but anybody can not reply me correctly . in microsoft forum post to me that i can combine them in 1 exe that when end user run 1 exe, both exe runs at the same time ..
|
|
|
|
|
You posted the same question 3 hours ago - its still on this page of the forum.
Keep it in 1 thread!
Current blacklist
svmilky - Extremely rude | FeRtoll - Rude personal emails | ironstrike1 - Rude & Obnoxious behaviour
|
|
|
|
|
If the microsoft forum know how to do it, then you must ask there, not here...
|
|
|
|
|
You can't do that. You cannot combine 2 .EXE's into one an expect them both to work. It's plain old not possible...
Dave Kreskowiak
Microsoft MVP - Visual Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'd like to make an app run from the sys tray without pressenting a form. The problem is the object goes out of scope after creation unless I use:
while(this.Created) { Application.DoEvents(); }
The class has to inheret from IDisposable so that Created can be set to false and exit the loop. I do not like using this loop as it puts the cpu usage up to 100% untill an Event occurs.
Any ideas on another approach?
-- modified at 6:43 Thursday 6th July, 2006
DOh, spelling mistakes!
|
|
|
|
|
Hello
You can make things easy for yourself by making a form and hide it using Hide() method, or making opacity = 0 in the contructor. Also don't forget to turn ShowInTaskbar property to false;
Regards
|
|
|
|
|
I hope 5 is a good vote because I'd give you 55 if I could!!
I've been screawing around with background threads and alsorts of other tricks, it's been driving me mad.
Nice one! that's brilliant!
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you!
It's really nice of you to say that.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all
I am wondering how to protect .NET applications from being decompiled or in other word prevent it from reverse engineering
I hope of any one can help
Thx all
|
|
|
|
|
Google ".net obfuscator"
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
thx Kevin
but I already know this technique , and I don't want to move my problem to other parity to sole it for me, I want to make my own technique in preventing .NET Code from being decompiled, and if obfuscatation is the the only way to make this protection I want to make my protection
thx again for your interest
|
|
|
|
|
ahmedsabry wrote: I want to make my own technique in preventing .NET Code from being decompiled
Go for it, and let us all know how it goes
|
|
|
|
|
Use a Dotfuscator. MSDN has some useful information on this.
Type "obfuscation" and find out
|
|
|
|
|
I have a monthcalendar control and a combo box control.
The current flow of my program is after deselecting a date, it will add a new row in a temporary DataTable.
These are the line of codes i am using:
Trow= Ttable.NewRow(); Trow[0] = this.monthCalendar1.text; Trow[1] = this.ddlType.SelectedIndex; Ttable.Rows.AddTrow
but what if the selected date already exist?
what should be done so that it will not add a new row instead update that row?
thanks a lot in advance!
|
|
|
|
|
Hello
Maybe you should try using the SELECT command to see if it will give you an existing row or not.
If the row exists => update it
else => Add a new one
Regards
|
|
|
|
|
System.Web.HttpException: User control source files must have a .ascx file extension.
phan tien van
|
|
|
|
|
Few more words of explanation of your post won't cost you much
|
|
|
|
|
Also posting it in the correct forum might help.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I have doubt by using Shadowcopying. Please anyone give samples and explanation how shadow copy is working in .net windows forms using c#.
Thanks,
kokila.
|
|
|
|
|
If I understand your question correctly:
Any copying creates a copy of an object so that you can re-use it. The difference between shallow and deep cloning is that generally in Shallow copying only the value properties of the object you're copying are copied, e.g:
You have an Employee object which contains the properties Name and Manager where Manager is of type Employee . Then when you do a shallow clone a new Employee object is created with the same Name but Manager still points to the original Manager object. If you Deep clone it then a copy of the Manager object referenced by Employee is also made.
So basically:
Manager 1:
Name = "Bill"
Manager = <code>null</code>
Employee 1:
Name = "Bob"
Manager = Manager 1 If you shallow clone you get:
Employee 2:
Name = "Bob"
Manager = Manager 1 If you deep clone you get:
Employee 2:
Name = "Bob"
Manager = Manager 2
Manager 2:
Name = "Bill"
Manager = <code>null</code> Note that if you deep clone the copying of objects is recursive (I think) so if Manager 2's Manager was not null then a copy of Manager 2's Manager would be made as well.
The Welsh will always support two teams: The Welsh, and anyone playing England
|
|
|
|
|
You asked the same question 22 hours ago. Why not look at the responses you received rather than re-ask the same question.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Mark,
i have seen your response but you didn't give any samples. so i asked any samples from you. But you didn't reply. so i put new messagge.
Thanks,
kokila.
|
|
|
|
|
kokilambal.p wrote: so i put new messagge.
Repeatedly putting up the same message is a wonderful way of getting people NOT to help you
|
|
|
|