|
Err the bug is back.
to re-explain my setup, my solution has a class library project with the control and its items and type converters and that generic event collection thing i made. In same solution, but in a windowsApplication project i reference the control library and drag it from the toolbox to a form.
So i think the bug here is that vs does something when presented with a control... like it "gets used to it" in some way...like when it generates the resx files or something like that. Then even if it seems to work,...you tinker with a property or part of this control and vs tries to re-"get used to it" and makes mistakes cause theirs items serialized in designer class or something...and then the error message... this is so lame lol
|
|
|
|
|
Hi!
How can i update and xml file, i mean i get it in the memory with the XmlDocument class and then i want to add in the middle after and element name another element,node
is there a diffrence between them?
i always get an exception when using the the replace method.
can someone please write and example how i get the node out append it with children and then put it back to the class and then write it out again?
Thanks 
|
|
|
|
|
ytubis wrote: can someone please write and example how
Why does everyone expect others to write the code for them?
XmlElement is derived from XmlNode. To append a child node to a give node you would use the aptly named AppendChild method. To save the XmlDocument you would use the cleverly named Save method.
|
|
|
|
|
What might be the name of the method which one would use to load data into an XmlDocument? 
:josh:
My WPF Blog[^]
|
|
|
|
|
i simply create new XmlDocument with its string constructor which gets the file path.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am sorry but i still get the exception that the XML has this Xmlnode,and when i use the replace method i get the same exception, can some one give and example, a link,even from this site.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tricky Microsoft Devils hiding information in DOCUMENTATION... someone should sue them for that!
"Just about every question you've asked over the last 3-4 days has been "urgent". Perhaps a little planning would be helpful?"
Colin Angus Mackay in the C# forum
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm still relatively new to SQL and I was wondering whether there was an easier way to do things.
I need to limit a query based on if a field is like one of three values. I can use "WHERE field in ('list one', 'list two', 'list three')", and I can to "WHERE field like 'list one' or field like 'list two' or field like 'list three'". Is there a way, however, to combine 'in' and 'like' to do something like "WHERE field in like ('list one', 'list two', 'list three') ?
|
|
|
|
|
Drew McGhie wrote: WHERE field in like ('list one', 'list two', 'list three')
That sounds like Valley Girl SQL. 
You should post this to the SQL forum, you'll probably get more and faster responses than in the C# forum.
:josh:
My WPF Blog[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Josh Smith wrote: Valley Girl SQL
Sweet
UMM LIKE CREATE PROCEDURE Procedure1
ASIF
SELECT LIKE ALL OF Table1, DUH
UHH GO
Logifusion[^]
|
|
|
|
|
|
You are like so totally a like hard core developer, or something. 
:josh:
My WPF Blog[^]
|
|
|
|
|
awesome
modified 12-Sep-18 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
This gets the best post of the day award hands down!
I can just see the Valley Girl SQL compiler error messages now:
line 1: "CREATE PROCEDURE"
compile error, expected token UMM, LIKE, or UHH
Sincerely,
Alexander Wiseman
|
|
|
|
|
Alexander Wiseman wrote: compile error, expected token UMM, LIKE, or UHH
Hilarious!
Josh, I think you should patent the name.
Logifusion[^]
|
|
|
|
|
I think your post should share the award.
Cheers,
Vikram.
"I am not Jesus and will never be. The fact is I was a piece of cr*p till I found Him." - Paul Selormey.
|
|
|
|
|
line 1: "CREATE PROCEDURE"
Ya know, there was this like compile error, and I kinda expected a token umm, like, UMM, LIKE, or UHH
I've seen better runs in my shorts! - Patches O'Houlihan
|
|
|
|
|
How about ...
Umm SELECT LIKE STUFF
FROM YOU KNOW LIKE DUH
WHERE THINGS ARE LIKE WHATEVER
ORDER BY DRIVETHROUGH, FRIESWITHTHAT = YES
|
|
|
|
|
No you can't do that. You would have to say where (field like '%list1%' or field like '%sdf%') but that would be inefficient anyway.
how vital enterprise application are for proactive organizations leveraging collective synergy to think outside the box and formulate their key objectives into a win-win game plan with a quality-driven approach that focuses on empowering key players to drive-up their core competencies and increase expectations with an all-around initiative to drive up the bottom-line. But of course, that's all a "high level" overview of things
--thedailywtf 3/21/06
|
|
|
|
|
Select Field1,Field2,Field3 From TableName Where Field1 In(Select Field4 From Table2 Where Field4 Like '%Something%')
|
|
|
|
|
I mean be an idiot for asking this question too but is there a way to pass a class as a parameter of a method i.e.
I have a repeated block of code like this:
class pTermsEditor;
pTermsEditor = new class();
pnlViews.Controls.Add(pTermsEditor);
pTermsEditor.Dock = DockStyle.Fill;
This Block of code is repeated many times but the class type may and almose always does change, so I want to control it more by putting it into a method something like this:
myMethod(class)
{
class x;
x = new class();
//blah blah blah
}
Any help or even a better solution what be greatly appreciated
|
|
|
|
|
You can use the object type, and it is a valid question.
for example
<br />
myMethod(object obj)<br />
{<br />
if (obj.GetType() == typeof(classA))<br />
{<br />
ClassA objA;<br />
objA = (ClassA)obj;<br />
return;<br />
}<br />
if (obj.GetType() == typeof(classB))<br />
{<br />
ClassB objB;<br />
objB = (ClassB)obj;<br />
return;<br />
}<br />
<br />
}
how vital enterprise application are for proactive organizations leveraging collective synergy to think outside the box and formulate their key objectives into a win-win game plan with a quality-driven approach that focuses on empowering key players to drive-up their core competencies and increase expectations with an all-around initiative to drive up the bottom-line. But of course, that's all a "high level" overview of things
--thedailywtf 3/21/06
-- modified at 14:58 Thursday 6th July, 2006
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
