|
There is people for eveything... :S
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog> .
|
|
|
|
|
Posting a link in a year old question. Member 11923267[^].
modified 27-Nov-16 12:29pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Gentleman's Vegetables" no longer workie? This guy has a miracle fix: Member 12871495 - Professional Profile[^]
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
modified 2-Dec-16 12:57pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: Don't blindly report. I've put this here for discussion.
Code Review Checklist and Guidelines for C# Developers[^]
It certainly isn't an article per se. To me it seems like a collection of links. Whilst the content is valid (even though there are too many links in it for my taste) I'd consider it a Reference, not an article.
@sean-ewington Opinion on that?
modified 27-Nov-16 12:32pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Quite right. A reference. One of the few, I imagine. Fixed.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Looking at his profile I wonder if a note from @SeanEwington might be enough?
|
|
|
|
|
There is a hyphen in the atsign name for Sean: @Sean-Ewington
But...looking at his profile graph, he's been here a while, yes - but did almost nothing for five years and then started posting. And from what I can see, that's pretty blatant copy'n'paste work there. I'm happy with a kicking, but if Sean feels different I'm fine with that too.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, I could not remember how to put a member name in a message.
Looking at OP's previous contributions I think maybe it all needs checking before he gets the final kick. But I'm happy to roll with the majority (aka your) view.
|
|
|
|