|
Doesn't look familiar. I agree with the "just a warning" for now
|
|
|
|
|
Then its better to remove the link to member's profile.
|
|
|
|
|
One (or two if you count me) doesn't confirm he isn't a "come back" plagiarist: The comments with the link are there to prevent "automatic response" kicking.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I don't recognize him as well.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
gone
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog> .
|
|
|
|
|
|
10th kick applied.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting accounts and messages. No delete hammer this time (for others to have a look at).
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
I have given the 10th to many of them, the rest (like 10 or so) are on 9th
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog> .
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are two authors. A brand new account (ace maxs) and an old one from 2004 (Darocha). I suggest to not report the old one while it is not proved that he is a spammer.
|
|
|
|
|
Luser[^]
Message[^]
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
---
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
---
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
gone
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IMHO this is a difficult thema. I would say the most important points are... how are the answers? And... the context?
1) If a question already had answers and the new one doesn't give anything new... BAD
2) If a question already had answers (or not) but the new one is better... OK
A) If a question has had a spam answer that got reported (#solution is not matchin the number of answers) and hence appeared in the active list another time... not all people look at the timestamps and just think if it is in the list, it is a current question. Just tell "question is old" or similars would do the job.
B) If the question didn't have any spam and the guy is answering very close related questions... probability of site driving / rep hunt is very big (I would go for a report)
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
You're right, these are good pattern to follow...
In this case - IMHO - the answers add nothing, so should not been added at all...However it was a new member and got warned. Also his response was fair and good (to the warning), so no need of reporting...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
That is exactly what I meant... that with old questions depends on the context.
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: Also his response was fair and good (to the warning), so no need of reporting...
IMHO your position is correct
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|