|
His comments are all criticisms, yes. But...I saw no actual abuse there, just a grumpy so-and-so who didn't find exactly what he wanted. It's possible that he upvoted articles he did like without leaving a message - without that information, I don't feel I could "abuse" vote him based on the comments I did look at.
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
I didn't take any action against him aside from this post. It was just a thought about possible abuse, maybe even a sock puppet account.
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Kreskowiak wrote: maybe even a sock puppet account
Entirely possible - or he's just a grumpy curmudgeon. He certainly doesn't seem to be targeting one person or group, and it also doesn't seem to be a "binge downvoter" either.
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I took the nuclear option on the article. It died not with a bang, but a whimper.
|
|
|
|
|
I keep forgetting I have that option... 
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
All gone ![Beer | [beer]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/beer.gif)
To learn all there is to know. I know I'll be disappointed one day, but I've made a good start, and the eventual disappointment is likely to be brief.
-Roger Wright
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article gone, member needs 2 more kicks.
|
|
|
|
|
Given and gone
To learn all there is to know. I know I'll be disappointed one day, but I've made a good start, and the eventual disappointment is likely to be brief.
-Roger Wright
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is under the free tools section. Is that not OK? Shareware is "is proprietary software that is provided to users on a limited basis and only for a certain limited trial basis." Since it has a free version that is not time limited is it still considered Shareware?
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
RyanDev wrote: Since it has a free version that is not time limited is it still considered Shareware?
Edit: Never mind - I didn't notice the "Pro" version was different from the "Free" version.
It still seems a bit odd that the user's only interaction with the site in eight years is to post a link to a freemium tool that's not directly related to software development.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
True. Of course I signed up years ago, can't even remember why, but never really did anything until somewhat recently.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
[^]
I cant see the right hand side of the page, to report it sorry
[edit] that link pasted 'weirdly' - sorry [/edit]
'g'
modified 27-Jan-14 5:11am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Garth J Lancaster wrote: I cant see the right hand side of the page, to report it sorry
Same boat. Just do horizontal scroll till the end, you could see the red flag there.
Still need one more kick
thatrajaCode converters | Education Needed
No thanks, I am all stocked up. - Luc Pattyn
When you're wrestling a gorilla, you don't stop when you're tired, you stop when the gorilla is - Henry Minute
|
|
|
|
|
Both spammer and spam are gone now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
