|
This member http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/View.aspx?mid=11137948
Sorry...phone doesn't do links properly
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
He was a good child and changed the type as I suggested, before seeing the plagiarism report here[^]
Now it is reposted as http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=143782&aid=826928[^]
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
To be honest, I agree that some of the latest messages are quite meaningless and could have been avoided. But in my opinion a Rep Farmer / Hunter would have some bigger activity.
Paying attention to the timestamps of the QA-Answers and the forum messages I don't think it is over dimensionated, Taking today out of the equation he has 19 messages in the last 5 weeks, I don't see that a big deal, many of us get that number in only one day.
In addition the QA-Answers are quite "well-intention" and try to help (some of them got accepted as solution too)
Perhaps is he having a bad day?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
IMHO, you should remove the link to his member profile. That's all i want to mention here. Please.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Would you first care to explain why?
|
|
|
|
|
Its not the case of rep hunting. I should be agree with what Nelek stated. Let's forgive and have a close eye on him. What you think?
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I think this is the place to report actual, or potential, spammers. I leave it to Chris and the hamsters to decide what action to take.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cleaned the article, Member still there.
The console is a black place
|
|
|
|
|
This[^] from this[^] seems to be taken from here[^]. I wrote a warning message to the article, so let's see...
|
|
|
|
|
They aren't waiting 24 hrs anymore. This[^] is spamming "recovery tools", in this[^] spam setup question.
You can lead a developer to CodeProject, but you can't make them think.
The Theory of Gravity was invented for the sole purpose of distracting you from investigating the scientific fact that the Earth sucks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edit: no report needed links leaved to allow more opinions
This user[^] has his 2nd article[^] in the moderation queue (first one here[^]). The already approved article is in the "3rd party tools" section.
To be honest, I like how he wrote the articles, but he is promoting how easy it is to do that using a product. From the site of the product:
Quote: The trial version has some limitations but you can try all the functionalities of the SDK with the trial.
This reminds me some spammers we had a time ago promoting a solution to interact with MS-Office files "very easy". The trial was free as well, but many requesters complained about purchasing demands and we started banning them.
Is here to be considered as the same? no, because of 3rd party tools allowed in own section
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 7-Oct-14 6:53am.
|
|
|
|
|
As it is all-right to put such an article in the right category (3rd party tools) I had other problem with those articles - if you remove images and code dump (which in most cases needless) you left with nothing. Not even a tip...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, thanks for your opinion.
I'll remove the links to avoid not needed reports
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member shown the door; message still needs a few kicks.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
This user[^] (created today) is resurrecting old questions[^] to add a description of a product with a link to another site.
The answers are related to the question, but (one is 1+, the other 4+ years old so far).
Is that still in the "valid" area? or is it to be reported?
My opinion is yes. Created today, search for related questions (no matter how old) and directly posting links. But I would like to know your opinion about. Would it be enough to warn him? Or let's take the hammer?
BTW, he got hit by the links-bug in one of the questions and the posted links are actually pointing back to the QA item.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
No question here, but a spammer IMHO...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
