Spam and Abuse Watch

12-Jan-15 22:41

Please see Solution 2...
~~Detect Flash Player Installed in all Browsers[^]~~
User got a warning for now...

Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.

modified 13-Jan-15 6:00am.

Mitchell J.12-Jan-15 23:20

12-Jan-15 23:20

Looks fine to me... but maybe I missed something.

Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter12-Jan-15 23:23

12-Jan-15 23:23

Just was on the top of the question list, where the question is over a year old and the answer too have a few months...

Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.

Jochen Arndt12-Jan-15 23:27

Jochen Arndt

12-Jan-15 23:27

Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote:
the answer too have a few months

but has been just edited.
[EDIT]
first by the poster and then by Manfred.
[/EDIT]

Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter12-Jan-15 23:29

12-Jan-15 23:29

Do you mean 'edited' - no changes I can see between this and the previous version...
Anyway - probably you are right...harmless...

Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.

Mitchell J.12-Jan-15 23:38

12-Jan-15 23:38

You can see the versions here[^]

I dunno about harmless, he was adding his own personal details to the answer (self-promotion)

Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter12-Jan-15 23:41

12-Jan-15 23:41

I see it now - and even without seeing it before I got a bad feeling. It seems I got itchy with all the spams flying around...

Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.

Mitchell J.12-Jan-15 23:45

12-Jan-15 23:45

Is it kicking time (for abuse) then?

"mouse hovering over the button"

Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter12-Jan-15 23:57

12-Jan-15 23:57

Maybe not after all - his details has been removed, so maybe a warning would do...

Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.

Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter13-Jan-15 0:00

13-Jan-15 0:00

I added a warning...

Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.

Mitchell J.13-Jan-15 0:06

13-Jan-15 0:06

Mitchell J.12-Jan-15 23:36

Not a good question, but what's so abusive?

12-Jan-15 23:36

Ahh... now I see. Hmm.

1. OP asks question. It's solved.
2. A few months later someone posts a new answer saying the existing answer won't work in some scenarios
3. Just today, the author of the dubious answer edited his post, adding his contact details to it.
4. Manfred R. Bihy has just removed the contact info.

I don't have a problem with answers that are posted a few months after the question, because they are often useful to googlers who may come across the question in the future.

But those contact details[^] make me smell something Dead | X|

Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov13-Jan-15 16:12

Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov

13-Jan-15 16:12

It is not so good question, but I still cannot see anything so bad to report it here.
Are your accusations based on the timing (when it was posted, edited, etc.)? But what's wrong with posting a question, not attending it and refreshing later? Some just have no time to refresh it, or can get a better idea on what to ask about on the same topic. It's better than multiple re-posting.

Do I miss something?

—SA

Sergey A Kryukov

Re: Not a good question, but what's so abusive?

Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter13-Jan-15 18:14

[Gone] Big old spam hunt reprise. Part IV - 120 of 464

13-Jan-15 18:14

The last update was the personal contact info of the member in solution 2. At the end the info removed and member got warning...The same time I crossed out the link...

Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.

den2k8812-Jan-15 20:29

den2k88

12-Jan-15 20:29

Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]

Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]

Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]

Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]

Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]

Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]

Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X

Re: Big old spam hunt reprise. Part IV - 120 of 464

OriginalGriff12-Jan-15 21:39

OriginalGriff

12-Jan-15 21:39

Spam deleted - members need more kicking. :phew:

Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

Ewwww yuck

Mitchell J.12-Jan-15 23:42

12-Jan-15 23:42

for (int j = 0; j < spammers.Count; ++j)
{
    CarefulCoder.ApplyBoot(spammers[j]);

    if (CarefulCoder.Mouse.IsWornOut)
        CarefulCoder.Mouse = new Mouse();
}

If only.

Gone

Richard Deeming13-Jan-15 1:58

Richard Deeming

13-Jan-15 1:58

10th kick applied to the last surviving spammer.

"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer

Spam in Objective-C

vonb12-Jan-15 20:12

vonb

12-Jan-15 20:12

Message: http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/4978786/Following-direct-input-and-feedback-from-thousands.aspx[^]

Member: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/View.aspx?mid=11370791[^]

The signature is in building process.. Please wait...

Gone

Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter12-Jan-15 21:05