Spam and Abuse Watch Discussion Boards

gone

Nelek9-Feb-15 7:32

Nelek

9-Feb-15 7:32

gone

M.D.V.

If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

Forum spammer

Jochen Arndt8-Feb-15 21:27

Jochen Arndt

8-Feb-15 21:27

Account: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/View.aspx?mid=11437881[^]
Messages: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Messages.aspx?fmid=11437881[^]

Re: Forum spammer - Gone

Thomas Daniels9-Feb-15 6:27

Thomas Daniels

9-Feb-15 6:27

Gone

The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.

Baba

Thanks78728-Feb-15 20:45

Thanks7872

8-Feb-15 20:45

http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/View.aspx?mid=11437763[^]

"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad

Gone

Richard Deeming9-Feb-15 2:01

Richard Deeming

9-Feb-15 2:01

10th kick applied.

"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer

[Gone] Big old spam hunt. Part XXIII - 660 of 920

den2k888-Feb-15 20:28

den2k88

8-Feb-15 20:28

spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] emr[^]
spam[^] mer[^]

spam[^] mer[^]
spammer[^] with private forum
spam[^] spam2[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]

spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]

spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]

spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]

spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]

Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X

modified 9-Feb-15 14:16pm.

Re: Big old spam hunt. Part XXIII - 660 of 920

Thanks78728-Feb-15 20:47

Thanks7872

8-Feb-15 20:47

Reporting accounts and messages. No delete hammer this time (for others to have a look at).

"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad

Re: Big old spam hunt. Part XXIII - 660 of 920

Nelek9-Feb-15 7:31

Nelek

9-Feb-15 7:31

I have given the 10th to many of them, the rest (like 10 or so) are on 9th

M.D.V.

Babaji in Moderation

Tadit Dash (ତଡିତ୍ କୁମାର ଦାଶ)8-Feb-15 19:42

Tadit Dash (ତଡିତ୍ କୁମାର ଦାଶ)

8-Feb-15 19:42

http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/View.aspx?mid=11437431[^]

Re: Babaji in Moderation - Gone

Thomas Daniels9-Feb-15 6:24

Thomas Daniels

9-Feb-15 6:24

Gone

The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.

Spam & spammer

User 592418-Feb-15 17:50

User 59241

8-Feb-15 17:50

http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=158640&aid=874007[^]

Peter Wasser

"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell

Re: Spam & spammer

Jochen Arndt8-Feb-15 20:59

Jochen Arndt

8-Feb-15 20:59

There are two authors. A brand new account (ace maxs) and an old one from 2004 (Darocha). I suggest to not report the old one while it is not proved that he is a spammer.

Spam in Bugs & Sugs

Brisingr Aerowing8-Feb-15 10:40

Brisingr Aerowing

8-Feb-15 10:40

Luser[^]

Message[^]

What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
---
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
---
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???

gone

Nelek9-Feb-15 7:26

Nelek

9-Feb-15 7:26

gone

M.D.V.

Should we warn him?

Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter8-Feb-15 1:22

Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter

8-Feb-15 1:22

http://www.codeproject.com/script/Answers/MemberPosts.aspx?tab=answers&mid=11126871[^]
Two of the three answers are for old questions...

Got a warning...

Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.

modified 8-Feb-15 7:45am.

Re: Should we warn him?

User 110609798-Feb-15 3:03

User 11060979

8-Feb-15 3:03

I also think answering old question is not useful. But on the other hand today there was a lucky shot for me to read one of these, which show me to a very useful link Database Connection with access,excel,sql,oracle,sqlite using wpf.[^]
Bruno

In the same time I am so crept into the trap. How can we prevent instantiation a class[^]
allready deleted my answer....sh*t happens Frown | :(

Bruno

modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.

Re: Should we warn him?

Nelek9-Feb-15 7:25

Nelek

9-Feb-15 7:25

IMHO this is a difficult thema. I would say the most important points are... how are the answers? And... the context?

1) If a question already had answers and the new one doesn't give anything new... BAD
2) If a question already had answers (or not) but the new one is better... OK

A) If a question has had a spam answer that got reported (#solution is not matchin the number of answers) and hence appeared in the active list another time... not all people look at the timestamps and just think if it is in the list, it is a current question. Just tell "question is old" or similars would do the job.
B) If the question didn't have any spam and the guy is answering very close related questions... probability of site driving / rep hunt is very big (I would go for a report)

M.D.V.

Re: Should we warn him?

Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter9-Feb-15 7:33

Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter

9-Feb-15 7:33

You're right, these are good pattern to follow...
In this case - IMHO - the answers add nothing, so should not been added at all...However it was a new member and got warned. Also his response was fair and good (to the warning), so no need of reporting...

Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.

Re: Should we warn him?

Nelek9-Feb-15 7:35

Nelek

9-Feb-15 7:35