|
No problem...
I made a simple test with Management Studio 2008 against SQL Server 2005 Express Edition and still ok. Here's what was generated:
BEGIN TRANSACTION
GO
ALTER TABLE dbo.Test ADD
ToBeAdded nchar(10) NOT NULL CONSTRAINT DF_Test_ToBeAdded DEFAULT N'Some kind of value...'
GO
COMMIT
However I do have SP 2 on SQL 2005. Perhaps that would be the problem?
Mika
The need to optimize rises from a bad design
|
|
|
|
|
|
What I did in Management Studio was the following:
- selected the table from Object Explorer
- from Context menu for the selected table: "Design"
- added the necessary field and a default value for the field, but I didn't save
- then from the menu bar I selected "Table Designer" and then "Generate Change Script..."
- the code block in the previous post was copied from the dialog that opened
[Addition]
The build number for me is different: 9.00.3068.00 so I take it there are some differences in the engine.
[/Addition]
Hope this helps,
Mika
The need to optimize rises from a bad design
modified on Wednesday, September 24, 2008 3:45 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Ahh ok im with you, i found it... But now you are going to laugh, when i select the "Generate Change Script" the absolute same error box pops up.
heres the full error code:
Saving changes is not permitted. The changes you have made require the following tables to be dropped and re-created.
You have either made changes to a table that can't be re-created or enabled the option Prevent saving changes that require the table to be re-created.
With great code, comes great complexity, so keep it simple stupid... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actually I cannot laugh because it would wake up the children... 
But seriously, have a look at this Save (Not Permitted) Dialog Box[^]
Could the first bullet be the reason?
Also did you notice my modification about the build number in the previous post
The need to optimize rises from a bad design
|
|
|
|
|
hehe we found the same site... funny... thanks..
To work around this error do the following:
To change this option, on the Tools menu, click Options, expand Designers, and then click Table and Database Designers.
Select or clear the Prevent saving changes that require the table to be re-created check box.
With great code, comes great complexity, so keep it simple stupid...
|
|
|
|
|
You're welcome
Mika
P.s. Just a tip: Downvoting on some people may cause that they don't want to help any further
The need to optimize rises from a bad design
|
|
|
|
|
Downvoting ??? i didnt... i set the first answer to "Did not help"...
With great code, comes great complexity, so keep it simple stupid...
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, I have Picture object in .NET, I need to save it in Direct Text based query like,
"update table set picimage = " & ObjectName & " WHERE code = '111'"
What is the way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
hi all,
I want to open my back up database into other client systems.
Clearly I did one of my database into back up...that back up file open into others systems .
|
|
|
|
|
I am having kinda the same problem as the one already mentioned here:
Connection Pooling nightmare[^]
This is what's happening for me. Suppose that I've got a connection pool with minimum size of 10 and maximum size of 50. I'm monitoring the connections to database using SP_WHO stored procedure as well. When the first request is made to the web site, I can see that 10 connections are created in the pool. The thing that is confusing me is that by making a few subsequent requests, new connections are added to the pool even though all of 10 initial connections are in 'sleeping' mode and 'AWAITING COMMAND' as executing SP_WHO tells me. By executing subsequent calls to database the size of pool grows until it reaches the maximum number of connections (say 50). From this point on, any attempt for connecting to database results in the following exception:
DAL:Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool.
This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in use and max pool size was reached.
This is happening while there are 50 connections in the pool whose status is 'sleeping' and AWAITING COMMAND.
I'm using Microsoft Enterprise Library (which I think automatically handles closing connections for me), and wherever I use DataReader, I am closing it in a finally block.
Am I missing something? Please somebody help me!
_
|
|
|
|
|
Are you using your own connection pool or the built in connection pooling (that happens transparently)?
Are you connecting using multiple SQL accounts (this will prevent connections being used by multiple accounts).
Are you disposing of all resources?
Are you actually using any of the features of the EL? (Apart from ExecuteDataSet).
|
|
|
|
|
I think I've found the problem. One of the data access functions was acquiring a DataReader without closing it. I don't know why I hadn't see it so far 
Thanks for your help though ![Rose | [Rose]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
_
|
|
|
|
|
Are you certain the connection strings are identical - even the case of individual letters matters. ANY difference will cause a new connection.
Bob
Ashfield Consultants Ltd
|
|
|
|
|
I think I've found the problem. One of the data access functions was acquiring a DataReader without closing it. I don't know why I hadn't see it so far
Thanks for your help though
_
|
|
|
|
|
table
id val
1 11
2 22
3 33
4 44
6 55
Take MA3 for example, I wrote one, but not fast enough for draw the MA line, here it is:
SELECT a.id,ma=CASE WHEN a<2 THEN NULL ELSE AVG(b.val) END
FROM table a,table b WHERE b.id BETWEEN a.id-2 AND a.id GROUP BY a.id
Thanks in advance.
More local variables mean higher cohensive
Less function parameters mean looser coupling
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all..
I have an application which is having 2 servers.
client is having his own server and we are maintaining another server for online transactions.
when internet connection fails at client side,client is allowed to perform transaction at his place and we need to synchronize the database of both client side and server side when connection gets active.
can you one give me suggestions...
if the post is not clear.. i will give you in details..
Thankyou...
siri
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure whether Biztalk can solve ur problem...
If U Get Errors U Will Learn
If U Don't Get Errors U Have Learnt
|
|
|
|
|
Using merge replication is one choice.
The need to optimize rises from a bad design
|
|
|
|
|
HI
Can any one let me know, how to sort on cloumn with text data type in SQL Server 2005, thanks in advance, kindly Reply ASAP.
|
|
|
|
|
select * from table order by columnname asc
or
select * from table order by columnname desc
I Love T-SQL
"Don't torture yourself,let the life to do it for you."
If my post helps you kindly save my time by voting my post.
|
|
|
|
|
you can not sort column with data type text with order by ASC or DESC, Even group by cann't be use, is there any other wat i can sort the column with the data type text. thankx for ur reply.
|
|
|
|
|
Have a look at SUBSTRING.
I believe that you would have gotten far more answers if you wouldn't have requested to reply ASAP. That's considered rude.
The need to optimize rises from a bad design
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
