|
Article wrote: Just like humans, AI-based large-language models have characteristics such as morals and values. No fvck Sherlock... as if the fed data were so "objective", "ethical" and / or "neutral"
How was the say? "Sh*t in, even shittier out"?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Ahhh - where's your optimism? "Point a hose of sh*t at a field, and grow some wonderful mushrooms!"
|
|
|
|
|
David O'Neil wrote: Ahhh - where's your optimism? I lost it when I start seeing how our society "gets more advanced" and understanding some hidden agendas behind many "good acts"
And if you can't really trust acts... don't get me started about texts explaining that acts (there are as many different versions as there are people writing about the same fact)
David O'Neil wrote: "Point a hose of sh*t at a field, and grow some wonderful mushrooms!" mmmhhh... "Happy" mushrooms could actually be an idea
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
My take is that I don't need to bother with deciding to trust/not trust acts or worry too much about hidden agendas.
If I really want any mountains moved any certain direction then worrying with what rocks other people are moving is just wasting time I could be spending moving my own rocks just the way I think they oughta be moved.
Results-driven?
|
|
|
|
|
The problem is when they are moving their rocks to the position you are taken yours...
Eventually, you will empty the slot anyways (if they are not many or not powerful enough), but it is going to be longer and harder
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
This is only a real problem if it's a real problem to miss the destination.
You're still gonna stick the landing (and lots of future ones) because you have really strong legs now from moving all those rocks.
There are only absolute failures if you allow there to be.
|
|
|
|
|
I like your attitude, but life is sometimes more complicated and out of control than many would like to.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
It's easy to talk big on the internet. Now just let me see if I can go walk it a bit.
Sometimes you are absolutely right. Stuff is way more complicated and out of control the world over at the moment.
Be willing to accept some unknowable consequences (if you aren't already). I've been maybe both risk-averse and risk-prone about too many of the wrong things.
So dropping things (and people, at times) and listening for what screams helps to part wheat from chaff. It's what actually needs my attention. Sometimes, I just don't know how else to move any rocks.
|
|
|
|
|
Mushrooms... the silver lining of sh*t, or some sh*t at least.
|
|
|
|
|
If a Microsoft product or service is still in preview after more than 18 months, it is likely time to move on. Preview considered harmful
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: If a Microsoft product or service is still in preview after more than 18 months, it is likely time to move on. At least Google does it easier for the users... they cancel it way sooner and you HAVE to move on...
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Piggybacking off the lessons of "fail fast"? That's good enough to be real.
"Don't start nothin' and there won't be nothin'."
I want to believe that's intentional... not letting things get "too big to fail".
I'm not sure that I do. But maybe they've said so, I have no idea.
|
|
|
|
|
jochance wrote: I want to believe that's intentional... not letting things get "too big to fail". Yeah, I suppose so.
But in not letting it too big to fail, I have to partially disagree there were many cancelation at Google of products that I wouldn't say they even reached the "small" part
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not totally against any sort of decentralization by a long shot.
But it is superficially obvious that broom closets have advantages over clouds.
|
|
|
|
|
jochance wrote: But it is superficially obvious that broom closets have advantages over clouds.
You don't have to tell me.
Sadly the most taking decissions ignore it.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Are you referring to the "New" Outlook that only supports a single Exchange mailbox at a time.
|
|
|
|
|
We’re launching the GPT Store to help you find useful and popular custom versions of ChatGPT. For all your GPT needs
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: For all your GPT needs That start looking as the classified messages of the newspapers
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Researchers identify 23 vulnerabilities, some of which can exploited with no authentication. Do you need network-connected wrenches to fix the network-connected refrigerator?
I can see why they made them (to automatically look up and apply torque settings in factories), but my mind still boggles that someone made network-connected wrenches. WRENCHES!
|
|
|
|
|
Featuring Gorilla Glass 25? 1080p display?
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: I can see why they made them (to automatically look up and apply torque settings in factories) exactly
Manpower is still way cheaper in many countries, and with those things you can get "similar" results as with automatic stations as long as the target torque is within common human strength for a small fraction of the cost per unit of time / product.
If they survive the startup phase, I can imagine a bunch of companies that will get them to reduce even more costs producing abroad if the security gets to "half usable without risking the factory" (or maybe even before, as long as the benefits still overcome the costs).
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I really want an IoT fork.
Just so that when it gets jacked and stops working I can say, "well now we're really forked".
|
|
|
|
|
Hackers broke into the SEC's X account to falsely post that Bitcoin ETFs were approved, causing $90 million in liquidations. Usually they just make everyone else lose money
|
|
|
|
|
Wait for it - the SEC will try to blame Elon Musk for this as well. Musk has issues, but the SEC has a serious hard case against him.
|
|
|
|