|
|
Poorly secured certificate lets hackers impersonate any website on the Internet. Sounds a little odd to me
|
|
|
|
|
This bug will reverberate loudly.
|
|
|
|
|
"Hi, I'm a pair of headphones, can I have your bank details?"
Poorly object-orientated security certificates, if you ask me.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
If there’s one archaeological find that would turn the world on its head it would be the discovery of the lost city of Atlantis. Many have looked for the remains of the mythical locale, but nobody has come close to actually finding it, and researchers claiming to have found it in the past have all ultimately been proven wrong. I'm sure they just need a 'small investment' to confirm their findings
|
|
|
|
|
From the article: the location was chosen based on Plato’s writings as well as other text "Other texts"?
AIRI, the only texts that actually mention Atlantis are Greek -- y'know, the Greeks who had bugger all to do with Spain until thousands of years after Atlantis disappeared.
And concrete? Concrete was invented by the Romans, who had a ready and plentiful source of the chemicals required for it. Concrete older than the Roman empire doesn't exist.
In point of fact, if it weren't for much, much older texts (like the Frisian Linda-something) which describe weather conditions consistent with a really bleeding huge volcanic incident, I'd be tempted to disregard the whole Atlantis thing -- but on the far side of Spain?
How much is the Spanish tourist board paying him?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
A survey of Rust users finds difficulty and frustration with the language’s highly touted features for memory safety and correctness Maybe they just need some WD-40 between the ears?
or sleep?
|
|
|
|
|
In other industry news, the problems certain users have with Rust have been addresses with a workaround.
A spokesman said that the workaround involved "studying the bloody language before making a pissing mess with it".
Bloody kiddies. If they can't code during their breaks between tweets, they blame the language.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
“Rust’s big claim to fame is a mix of speed and memory safety. Rust code compiles to machine-native instructions, and the syntax and idioms around memory management—lifetimes and borrowing—make it difficult for memory-unsafe code to compile at all. But users still have trouble understanding those metaphors.”
Pony is similar in this area, possibly even more difficult. But with Pony it’s data race-unsafe code that won’t compile.
But, as they say, you don't get something for nothing.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
Rust also prevents data races by default. That's one of the major benefits of its ownership model.
(Races - Rust)
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
The web giant unveiled a service that lets owners of satellites rent time on Amazon-managed ground stations to send and receive data from orbit. For your next program ... innnnnnnnn SPaaaaaaCE
|
|
|
|
|
So no prizes for guessing the name of the malware that'll hack it.
Please don't do that, Dave.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Does Amazon actually have a Vice-President of Bullshit?
|
|
|
|
|
By 2022 more IP traffic will be created on global networks than in the entire 32 year life of the internet to date. Another shocking prediction for you
|
|
|
|
|
And the biggest part of it will be occupied by totally useless IoT Bullsh1t.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: By 2022 more IP traffic will be created on global networks than in the entire 32 year life of the internet to date. OK, I hate to play the grammar nazi (God, what a liar!), but that's not even a prediction; it's a simple statement of fact.
If you get only one bean per day, and you keep them all, then BY any given day, you've got more beans than you ever had on any previous day.
But even if you take that gaffe away, the statement is cr@p. Why 2022? why not "today", "Thursday week", "next year", or any other time?
Is there some intensive, incredibly accurate research program in place, which can precicely calculate the times in the future when things will happen"
Of course not. There's a dick sitting at a word processor, who's got bugger all to say, so he just makes sh1t up.
2022 sounds cool! I'll say 2022!
Here's a real prediction of the future: Talentless, click-baiting, "Internet-author" idiots will annoy me just as much in 2022 as they do now.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
See?
Fluffy bunny, through and through.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wonde Tadesse
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: I hate to play the grammar nazi
That should be "grammar Nazi"!
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
The only way to beat Skitt's law is by adding an error that you're in control of.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
That brings to mind the story about the guy who always travelled by air with a bomb in his suitcase.
He had calculated the probability of there being a bomb on an airplane, and it wasn't low enough for comfort. However, the probability of there being TWO bombs on an airplane was low enough even for him.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
The way that line is worded is very confusing and ambiguous, but I take that to mean either A) from now until 2022, the amount if IP traffic is going to be more than the last 32 years of internet activity combined or B) the total annual traffic in 2022 is going to be more than the last 32 years combined
|
|
|
|
|
The most shocking thing about that article IMO is that by 2022 40% of the global population still won't be internet users.
Quote: This rather startling prediction comes from network infrastructure specialist Cisco which reckons that by 2022, 60 percent of the global population will be internet users.
EDIT: oh crap, am I still allowed to quote the article like that or is the EU coming after me now??
|
|
|
|
|
Someone call the bomb squad!
|
|
|
|