|
I think it would be better to give you the option to not start playing videos automatically.
|
|
|
|
|
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
@mspoweruserJan 25, 2018 at 18:03 GMT
It’s rather hard when your biggest success is also your biggest millstone, but for Microsoft the x86 Win32 platform has been both their biggest blessing and biggest curse, leading to their ubiquitous presence in every office and most households around the world, and also leaving them with an insecure platform which is difficult to monetize and manage. If at first you don't succeed, fail, fail again.
|
|
|
|
|
"Hi, I'm Satya and I'm addicted to idiocy."
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe 2019 will FINALLY be the year of Linux!
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Sketching out rough ideas—traditionally on the back of a napkin in the US, backs of envelopes being preferred in the UK—is a common and important part of the design process, with the familiar pen or pencil and paper being favored for rough mockups and outlines. And then they click on the happy face; that takes them to the squiggly box...
|
|
|
|
|
Advancements being made in artificial intelligence and machine learning are fueling a move to the cloud. Forecast: Cloudy with a chance of large bills
|
|
|
|
|
You're my only hope![^]
Mission Impossible-like:
This message will self-destruct in three months, when you have finished viewing it.
|
|
|
|
|
An asteroid will whip past Earth just before the Philadelphia Eagles face off against the New England Patriot in Super Bowl LII, but NASA assures it won't interrupt the game. "Go long!"
That's the only football lingo I know. Do they use flags in the Supper Bowl, or is it two-hand touch only?
|
|
|
|
|
Tidal forces may keep the ball aloft longer?
|
|
|
|
|
Researchers at Curtin University in Australia published a study in Geology which found that more than a billion years ago, a chunk of present-day Canada broke away from the fledgling North American continent and smashed into Australia. That chunk of land is present-day Georgetown, Australia. Chris, no souvenirs!
|
|
|
|
|
Does that mean that Georgetown's address is Physical Canada and Logical Australia?
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
Does that mean Canadian's can visit or move there? Is it sovereign land?
Are the current inhabitants considered to be Canadians?
|
|
|
|
|
It was all that maple syrup.
|
|
|
|
|
Developers tend to get thrown under the bus when it comes to application security, but recent data shows that developers do, in fact, care about security. Write your new password on a Post-It before changing it?
|
|
|
|
|
Old data suggests the same. What is and is not implemented is usually not the choice of the developer.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
A Google engineer who just left the company after nearly 13 years criticized it Wednesday for becoming "100% competitor-focused" and said the company "can no longer innovate." So, "Google is the new IBM/DEC/Microsoft?"
|
|
|
|
|
Billed by Google X chief Astro Teller as a “digital immune system,” Chronicle focuses on detecting threats by analyzing and storing security-related data within large enterprises. All you have to do is run all your company's data through Google to keep it safe?
|
|
|
|
|
The title (of the link below) is a bit misleading.
The document is very well written and :
1. explains the challenges of concurrency
2. a method of solving those challenges.
What Are Actors | Akka.NET Documentation[^]
|
|
|
|
|
That article actually does a great job of pointing out that most software engineers falsely believe that the computer is following the Von Neumann architecture[^]. But actually... most modern CPU are implementing a Modified Harvard architecture[^].
But we really need something new... and in light of the recent Spectre and Meltdown vulnerabilities... the existing architectures are under intense review. Hopefully the JUMP research grants[^] will pay off and result in a new distributed CPU architecture.
Best Wishes,
-David Delaune
|
|
|
|
|
Great comments. I agree.
Randor wrote: But we really need something new... and in light of the recent Spectre and Meltdown vulnerabilities
I thought that was interesting that the article also touched upon the way parallel cores work and as I read it I thought of the spectre and meltdown bugs too. That's what made the article additionally interesting at this current time.
EDIT
Also, thanks for mentioning that von neumann architecture vs. modified harvard architecture difference. That was good reading too.
modified 24-Jan-18 17:12pm.
|
|
|
|
|
In many projects, there is a certain amount of code generation. The generated code is not seldom treated as a second-class citizen, the only measurement of code quality being whether it compiles and passes the tests. We can – and should – do better. This blurb was generated by a tool
|
|
|
|
|
"This blurb was generated by a tool"
That's being unkind to yourself. I know you occasionally double-post news, but wouldn't go so far as to call you a tool.
(That may be an English idiom, but when someone here is described as a tool, it means they're a bit of an idiot)
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
I thank you for recognizing where I was going with that one (and even more for accepting me as a non-tool)
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Every time in my career I have had to deal with Lex/Yacc or similar tools, I shudder and pray I don't need to debug the generated code, and inevitably do.
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|