|
Did they get Scott Bakula? Is this a quantum leap for them?
|
|
|
|
|
I was thinking Quantum of Solace. Don't expect it to do much.
|
|
|
|
|
Every time you write code or introduce third-party services, you are introducing the possibility of failure into your system. Would someone tell that to my boss?
I still do get paid though, right?
|
|
|
|
|
What a brilliant intro; only those who don't work never fail, so yes; everywhere where someone works, we are introducing the possibility of failure.
And yes, it pays to not have dependencies, so the "not invented here" idea will not go away quickly.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
But when you introduce a new system, you introduce new variables, new failure points, and new problems.
But at least then it's my own cozy warm corner of hell, rather than the one my predecessor left me with, which is after all why I'm introducing a new system.
However, I am, unconvinced - I think it's fundamental human nature, beginning with the act of procreation, which definitely qualifies for introducing new variables, failure points and problems!
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: However, I am, unconvinced - I think it's fundamental human nature, beginning with the act of procreation, which definitely qualifies for introducing new variables, failure points and problems!
Unless you wrap it in a transaction that allows for a rollback?
|
|
|
|
|
Duncan Edwards Jones wrote: Unless you wrap it in a transaction that allows for a rollback?
Subtle!
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
The focus of this version was to stabilize current features while adding the most wanted ones that were missing. Good news for all you UWP developers
Try not to all rush the downloads at once.
|
|
|
|
|
Because a Facebook service is all we needed...
|
|
|
|
|
Researchers at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, create a neuromorphic chip with off-the-shelf components "Abby Normal. I'm almost sure that was the name."
|
|
|
|
|
Like with humans? I know some who has brain but no smarts...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Why do programmers sometimes feel like they are doing the same thing every day, day in and day out, for years on end? It's actually my fault. Sorry about that.
|
|
|
|
|
What you need to do is make programming exciting again.
Amen. And when I experience the rut of work (I refrained from verb-ing it, as that would result in "and when I'm rutting at work...") I come up with crazy ideas and write articles for Code Project!
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
In other words, what we think might be the effects of mysterious forces such as dark energy and dark matter in the Universe, could actually be the influence of alien intelligence - or maybe even aliens themselves. "Pass the dutchie on the left hand side"
|
|
|
|
|
...and back to the sentient laws of physics. To be fair Celts and Native Americans postulated that some time ago - and their imaginary was much more colorful. Reboots these days...
DURA LEX, SED LEX
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
When I was six, there were no ones and zeroes - only zeroes. And not all of them worked. -- Ravi Bhavnani
|
|
|
|
|
The latest Windows 10 insider build brings a change that puts the Windows PowerShell in the spotlight, as it replaces the super-popular Command Prompt in some essential parts of the operating system. But what about all that Batch programming power?
|
|
|
|
|
Apple is reportedly asking its manufacturing partners to investigate moving iPhone production to the United States. "I was born in the U.S.A., now"
|
|
|
|
|
A built-from-scratch operating system was in the development for the last 14 years at the Kaspersky Lab. Known as Kaspersky OS – doesn’t borrow anything from Linux – it’s a secure OS based on microkernel architecture and aimed for infrastructure and IoT devices. Sorry, it's not a 'real' OS unless it runs Doom
|
|
|
|
|
..and how would they prove that the system is "flawless"? It would need to be proven that there are no bugs, to qualify as "hackproof". How hackproof is it?
It touts Kaspersky OS as practically unhackable, "Practically" unhackable?
Feels like marketing-promises. Any proof of the concept available?
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft has turned on a new set of Windows Tips that inform Chrome and Firefox users on Windows 10 that Edge is a “safer” browser. It's also "safer" to walk around in bubble wrap wearing hockey pads, but I don't want to do that either.
|
|
|
|
|
We’re heading towards the end of 2016 more than two years after Microsoft first introduced Windows 10 and over 4 years since Microsoft introduced the new Windows apps framework in Windows 8 and Microsoft still hasn’t figured out how to make them work for users who want to be productive. But you can be non-productive on all platforms!
|
|
|
|
|
Not allowing multiple instances is a problem, but not the only one. It only demonstrates that the UWP platform is really designed for mobile-first scenarios, where more than one instance is not required. The "universal" part was only tagged on after these apps were failing with Windows 8 on the desktop, along with a window frame.
Other problems are:
a) No sufficient controls for productivity apps, the inbox ones are all touch-focused and oversized for non-touch input (so much about "adaptive layout"). I miss "normal" menu bars out of the box, for example.
b) No real extensibility. I know, they've got app services and app extensions by now, but they work like REST services, which can be problematic and is a serialization nightmare if you're trying to pass huge amounts of data. I miss "LoadLibrary" capabilities.
c) No system access. I miss a capability/contract to allow an app to call any "unsafe" API. Registry access, for example. It's OK if it wasn't allowed for apps you'd like to put on the Store, but it should be possible for sideloading scenarios, without the need for complicated and limited concepts like brokered components. I miss the ease of Win32 where everything was right at your fingertips without artificial barriers for the sake of security because you can't trust developers to do the right thing.
Last but not least, they are COM-based. If you ever take a look at the WRL, you can see all the madness and ugliness that is working underneath the shiny surface.
|
|
|
|
|
d) no good way to distribute outside of the MS App store.
I'm currently working on a kiosk style touchscreen application for a local business service provider in WPF so that the sale/deployment model is them selling a paid account to the web site end of the system and then downloading the app and a product key to the client; both dependent on subscription pricing to keep working. Even if they were willing to change their sales channel model to go through the MS Store, having to fork over 30(?) cents on the dollar for the privilege of MS pushing the app to their end users is unlikely to be positively received if we were to float it to them.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
In this study, Wressnegger et al. reveal how a codebase originally written for 32-bit, and which is perfectly secure on 32-bit platforms, can have new vulnerabilities simply by compiling it for 64-bit systems. That's why I compile everything for 8-bits
Maybe I should switch to 4? That would be more secure, right?
|
|
|
|
|
Why don't you delete the codebase? That way is perfectly safe from outside attacks
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|