|
Not spending enough time in the Land of Nod could turn you into a literal sleepyhead, reducing your cognitive capacities to the point of being “functionally drunk,” according to the co-author of a new study into sleeping patterns around the world. Which is my excuse for that code I wrote last night
It's just not as much fun
|
|
|
|
|
In this house we call it Paste Face.
|
|
|
|
|
Ron Anders wrote: Paste Face.
May I inquire as to the origin of that term?
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Comes from the all night party days after rock n' roll gigs. You get pasty tongue, eyes, you name it. No amount of toothpaste, mouth wash, coffee or carbonated soda will bring relief save for some good sleep.
Now we're old (er) and any time we didn't sleep so well we call it that.
|
|
|
|
|
I see.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
"functionally drunk:" well, of course, how else would you write insanely great code ?
«There is a spectrum, from "clearly desirable behaviour," to "possibly dodgy behavior that still makes some sense," to "clearly undesirable behavior." We try to make the latter into warnings or, better, errors. But stuff that is in the middle category you don’t want to restrict unless there is a clear way to work around it.» Eric Lippert, May 14, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
It required a study to confirm "sleep drunk" exists? Seriously?
Who is paying for this nonsense?
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
From the study: This work was supported by the Biomathematics Program at the Army Research Laboratory (W911NF-13-1-0449), the Human Frontier Science Program grant RPG 24/2012, and the Air Force Office of Scientific Research grant FA 9550-14-1-0092.
Apparently I am.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
Well one thing is knowing it, another is knowing how much it does affect the single individuals.
For example, we all know that caffein is a stimulant. But how much, and how reliably? My father gets sleepy but has palpitations; a friend of mine becomes like euphorically drunk with no inhibitions whatsoever with half a glass of coke; I get functional. But what is the average? If a generic person drinks a certain amount of caffeine what's the more probable effect and what's its magnitude? Those things are important for a number of reasons.
Also if you look to the financers of the original research you may see that they are various branches of the Army - in battle operations sleep deprivation is a danger real and constant so it's of paramount importance to know exactly how it will affect the majority of operators AND possibly to devise methods of selection / evaluation of resistance to sleep deprivation. Lives depend on it.
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
|
|
|
|
|
den2k88 wrote: Lives depend on it. ..yes, fine example of a justification for the expense.
den2k88 wrote: it's of paramount importance to know exactly how it will affect the majority of operators As you have explained yourself, that would be rather subjective, not quite the average.
And no, ain't the first study looking for the effects of sleep-deprivation
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
If “Tracy” were on your team, how would you handle her? Think of this as online management certification training
|
|
|
|
|
Message Closed
modified 13-May-16 6:43am.
|
|
|
|
|
Did you actually read the entire article? She was moved to a different department where has been a valuable asset for 8 years.
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
Before reading the conclusion I voted to get to the bottom of the issue and give her another chance. So I guess my instincts were good. Everyone deserves a second chance, sometimes it just takes time to figure out what makes a person tick.
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
Certbot is the next iteration of the Let's Encrypt Client; it obtains TLS/SSL certificates and can automatically configure HTTPS encryption on your server. For everyone who wants a little 'S' in their HTTP
|
|
|
|
|
James Gosling sounds off on Oracle's culture and handling of Java, clarifies some past comments, and addresses his "low expectations." "Oracle is a pretty transparent company in terms of motivation"
|
|
|
|
|
Macros have always been popular, first as part of the product, and now as an extension. In response to your feedback we have upgraded the Macros for Visual Studio 2013 extension to be compatible with Visual Studio 2015. You can download the upgraded extension from the Visual Studio Gallery. Macro all the things!
|
|
|
|
|
SyntaxNet is the overall framework for parsing sentences, called a "syntactic parser." Parsey McParseface is the English language plug-in for SyntaxNet. Sigh McSighface
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whiskey McTangoFoxface
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
|
raddevus wrote: That amounts to over 8 changes per second.
I sure hope they have good test coverage.
Ah, read the article. Seems like they have a good working process. What surprises me is also how simple the process sounds.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
raddevus wrote: 10,800 lines of code added, 5,300 lines of code removed and over 1,875 lines of code modified. Every. Single. Day.
And it's still sh*t.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh yes, care to elaborate?
Which part of the Linux Kernel do you feel fits your characterization?
|
|
|
|
|
Let's just pick named semaphores. The Linux implementation is absurd. How about the ACL security model? The poor file i/o support. The lack of unified handles. WaitForMultipleObjects? Then there's the "joy" of running multiple versions of gcc. How about shared library/dependency hell?
Then there's the dev tools. gcc/g++ is great, but GDB is a joke.
Linux fans are among the least critical of Linux. They resembled the three monkeys with hands over eyes, ears and mouth. There is nothing wrong. You don't need anything mentioned (until it's implemented and then suddenly everyone says how great the catch up feature is.)
How many Linux security problems are due to people being so frightened to make any strong criticism of it?
|
|
|
|