|
That's for a much harder to make multi-core fiber, while this one is for a single core fiber.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Ahhhh....the old multi-mode and single mode fiber issue, which can be confusing when they start talking about cores vs strands! (as some people reference each strand as core)
After all, they are both single strands of fiber when you look at them with the naked eye!
|
|
|
|
|
Still, I wouldn't mind having a terabit internet connection. Not sure what I would do with all that bandwidth, though.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Ditto.........Think I would start automatically download entire content from 'some' sites
I have a 100mb fiber link at home (not the UK one), but it a) grinds to a halt completely during peak time to content outside the country! and b) randomly stops working at other times for brief periods. Spoke to some others on the compound and their's is the same, they even had the provider out to check, but not resolved anything. it is as if the DNS stops working.
The fiber gateway also stops responding now and again to pings, especially at it appears to relate to when the outbound connection drops as well.
Really annoying when trying to Skype family in the UK in the evening.
|
|
|
|
|
Brisingr Aerowing wrote: Not sure what I would do with all that bandwidth, though.
Blow through your data cap in about 6 seconds?
<- US Resident and cable industry customer prisoner.
|
|
|
|
|
No data cap here.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
With 473 genes Syn3.0 is the simplest self-replicating cell known and could be basis for new organisms designed to make new antibiotics, fuels and drugs And it's positively, definitely, not going to cause the next global epidemic (probably)
|
|
|
|
|
There's some good complementary coverage in the Quanta article: [^]; it focuses in more detail on what the "unknown function" 79 genes (out of 473 genes in Syn3.0) imply for science, and for future research in artificial genomics.
«The truth is a snare: you cannot have it, without being caught. You cannot have the truth in such a way that you catch it, but only in such a way that it catches you.» Soren Kierkegaard
|
|
|
|
|
Data scientists spend the bulk of their time cleaning and preparing data for analysis. "When we were at school, our games were simple. I played a janitor, you played a monitor."
|
|
|
|
|
The company’s new app for Windows allows users to easily access their Docker containers. Run another OS while running the OS you're already running
Which is basically all I hear when I hear about Docker (yes, I'm too lazy to install and learn it)
|
|
|
|
|
I’ve talked in the past about legacy code as code that developers are afraid to touch. "Here be dragons"
|
|
|
|
|
FUD* is on the loose in legacy code.
*Fear Uncertainty Doubt - You can never be certain when you attempt to change someone else's (poorly written code) so you doubt it'll go well and you fear the outcome.
FUD rules the legacy!!!!
Maybe if you wait a bit the user will stop doing those things and there'll be no need to look at legacy code. Maybe...
My forthcoming book, Launch Your Android App, is available for pre-sale at Amazon.com -- releases on April 1, 2016 (no joke).
|
|
|
|
|
This past November, a group of researchers found some serious vulnerabilities in an encryption protocol that I, and probably most of you, use regularly. The group alerted the vendor, who is currently working to update the protocol and patch the vulnerabilities. The news will probably go public in the middle of February, unless the vendor successfully pleads for more time to finish their security patch. Until then, I've agreed not to talk about the specifics. Ab vg vfa'g. Jryy, tbbq rapelcgvba vf, V thrff.
|
|
|
|
|
No it isn't. Well, good encryption is, I guess.
|
|
|
|
|
Wise words. Wise words, indeed
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hear! Hear!
Haven't I railed against that culture here on CP several times in the past? And of course had others scoff in response, something about reinventing the wheel I think.
A developer's first thought upon meeting a challenge (something the standard library or framework doesn't have) should not be "where can I find something that does that?", but instead "can I do that myself?" If you can't do it yourself, fine, look for something ready-made*, but you have to remember that eventually you may find yourself in a situation where no one has gone before and you will have to do it yourself. Will you have allowed your development skills to atrophy? Or will your skills still be sharp from frequent use in many challenging situations? Be a developer!
* And read the code! Learn from it! Don't just use it; can you take the technique and develop a better or more suitable solution?
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, they do that on CP too?!
Well, I personally suffer from what should I bother learn this 10 class API when I could write my own class to do it!!
In fact everybody like my IoC / ServiceProvider / MEF clone here at work!
(under less than 739 lines of code)
|
|
|
|
|
You should write an article on CP about it!
Decrease the belief in God, and you increase the numbers of those who wish to play at being God by being “society’s supervisors,” who deny the existence of divine standards, but are very serious about imposing their own standards on society.-Neal A. Maxwell
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: A developer's first thought upon meeting a challenge (something the standard library or framework doesn't have) should not be "where can I find something that does that?", but instead "can I do that myself?" Have to disagree here I'm afraid. If the problem is trivial then yes, that's a good attitude. If, however, it's going to take you six months to implement and you are writing this for a commercial product then you should probably look to the ready made version that ticks all the boxes as far as the functionality you need.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
Definitely with you on this one Pete. Hopefully there is happy middle ground between 10 line "packages" and 20000 line frameworks somewhere.
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed, but I have to wonder why so many projects took this on as a dependency:
module.exports = leftpad;
function leftpad (str, len, ch) {
str = String(str);
var i = -1;
if (!ch && ch !== 0) ch = ' ';
len = len - str.length;
while (++i < len) {
str = ch + str;
}
return str;
}
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Because... because... it's javascript.
|
|
|
|
|
They didn't. Most of those guys took a dependency on Babel-core, a rather large library. Babel-core took a dependency on a small package called line-numbers that, of all things, auto-numbers lines of text, keeping them aligned. line-numbers is the one who took a dependency on left-pad.
|
|
|
|
|
But at the end, someone took a dependency on a glorified function call.
I'm not blaming the people at the top (gulp, Babel-core, etc.), but the guy that decided, "I'm just not up for writing 10 lines of code today, I'll trust this guy to never break this."
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|