|
yeh, they are mutually exclusive
|
|
|
|
|
Creativity cannot come with agile development.
Life is a computer program and everyone is the programmer of his own life.
|
|
|
|
|
As previously announced, starting January 12, 2016 Microsoft will no longer provide security updates, technical support or hotfixes for .NET 4, 4.5, and 4.5.1 frameworks. But 3.5 is still supported?
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe because 3.5 is an integral component of Windows 7?
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I was thinking of something like that - either Weven or Wen.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
IIRC 3.5sp0 is the integral OS component. 3.5sp1 is the supported version. My assumption's that it has to do with .net 2.0/3.0/3.5 collectively being .net generation 2 (and supported via in place upgrades from one to the next); with 3.5sp1 being the newest version of that family. 4.0/4.5/4.5.1/4.5.2/4.6 are all part of the 3rd .net generation, and are inplace upgrades from each other but install next to 3.5. (All of them install beside .net 1.1, if you've got something really old and crufty around. OTOH it's out of support so you really need to do something about it if you do.)
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Time to re-educate yourself in the mysterious ways of the 21st Century. .
|
|
|
|
|
...
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
Oh dear. I'm guilty of this
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
Don't trust anyone under thirty.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: .
Yup. After reading that I've resolved to end all of my texts with punctuation. Anyone who gets offended by that is probably a sunshine I want to elephant with anyway.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
I've always noticed that people think I'm a complete jerk when I use punctuation, even though I'm younger. I either seem really smart, or a jerk.
|
|
|
|
|
A look at recent patch lists for IE and Edge hints that many of IE's warts will continue to haunt us I am shocked.
|
|
|
|
|
So, more bloody edge than cutting edge.
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
I thought all the marketing said that Edge was a completely rebuilt browser from the ground up? You mean to say that the Marketers were lying to me!?!
|
|
|
|
|
Just replacing the code does not help. You have to replace the mindset that produces the code.
|
|
|
|
|
Dunno, I ignored the marketeers blather. The tech blogs from the IE team all were about how after forking the IE11 codebase they were gleefully deleting millions of lines worth of legacy support code for ActiveX/IE6mode/etc.
As a result Edge is free of any vulnerabilities from that garbage.
OTOH any bugs in the core rendering engine/etc that affect what was modern HTML circa 2011 (yeah, I know IE11 was a 2013 release, but IE lags FF/Chrome badly) will affect both browsers equally.
On the gripping hand any bugs from implementing HTML features through 2013 (Edge is still 2 years behind the competition on HTML5 support) will only affect edge and not IE11.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
It's not like they started from scratch...
Decrease the belief in God, and you increase the numbers of those who wish to play at being God by being “society’s supervisors,” who deny the existence of divine standards, but are very serious about imposing their own standards on society.-Neal A. Maxwell
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
Unusually large torrents renew calls to better protect vital Internet resource. Just in case you're noticing things a little slower than usual
|
|
|
|
|
There is nothing "vital" about the Internet.
|
|
|
|
|
Yahoo is reversing its plan to spin-off its huge stake in Chinese retail monster Alibaba. Instead it will spin of its core internet business, including names you recognize like Flickr, Tumblr, et al, into another business. Sell everything that people associate with your brand... Winning?
|
|
|
|
|
Avoiding billions in tax from spinning off their Alibaba share off instead is a win. (Actively selling the shares would be even worse; they'd still have the tax hit, but dumping that many shares at once would probably cause the price of them to plunge.)
The split should also remove billions of dollars worth of Conglomerate Discount[^] in Yahoo's current price. Currently Yahoo is worth ~$30bn, it owns ~$30bn of Alibaba, ~$8 billion of Yahoo Japan (a separate company now despite the name), and its own properties are worth several billion as well (I saw an estimate of $3-8bn in either the Arstechnica article or comments).
The next step will probably be to detach its Yahoo.jp stock as well (another holding company?), and then dismember what's left. I'm skeptical of any one entity wanting all of it. MS would probably want the search page (to protect Bings share if nothing else); but now that Nandella is at the helm I'm not sure if they'd want all the other odds and ends. Google'd be anti-trust blocked. Apple/Facebook/Twitter don't buy old ailing internet companies. It's too consumer for IBM or whOracle. Verizon bought AOL; even if they hadn't all of (divested) Yahoo would've been a really huge meal for it to try and digest. Even divested it's too big for most of the bottom feeder companies who buy up randomish sites in bulk hoping to make their acquisitions work based on benefits of scale in selling ad space; however there're a number of parts of Yahoo that could still be worth something to someone so I don't see it being shut down.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
All the evidence shows that programming requires a high level of aptitude that only a small percentage of the population possess. The current fad for short learn-to-code courses is selling people a lie and will do nothing to help the skills shortage for professional programmers. So.... 22 days?
Or 25 hours? for those who read those books.
|
|
|
|
|
Rather good article.
I am self taught programmer with something close to "bachelor degree in computer science" (French degree).
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: that programming requires a high level of aptitude that only a small percentage of the population possess
LIE...
programming requires only:
gimme code plzzzz, it's urgntzzzzzzzz
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|