|
Not according to the number of recruiters still calling begging me to switch jobs and refer friends for the 20 positions they can't fill.
Hogan
|
|
|
|
|
That is about as stupid as saying c++ has peaked.
(my opinion) In reality, more experienced c# developers exist, with less need to get answers to questions from tech sites.
The job market for C# fluctuates and is still the number 2 language in my area next to Java.
|
|
|
|
|
Should we trust a blog written by some one wearing a bowler hat?
|
|
|
|
|
ed welch wrote: some one wearing a bowler hat
What? Have we heard from DD?
|
|
|
|
|
Some idiot wrote: first appeared in 2000
Nah, 1999. And, yes, I partied.
|
|
|
|
|
IMHO, the peak will move higher over time. In effect, the peak, at any point of time, will be quite lofty for a sizeable proportion of programmers.
|
|
|
|
|
Security researchers have uncovered a flaw in the way thousands of popular mobile applications store data online, leaving users' personal information, including passwords, addresses, door codes and location data, vulnerable to hackers. This is why I rely on the tried-and-true pig latin to encrypt all communication
|
|
|
|
|
SAFe is a programming framework that aims to enable you to apply lean-agile practices at enterprise scale. Will it take your development projects where they need to go? Because the consultants needed a new way to define agile
|
|
|
|
|
a programming framework that aims to enable you to apply lean-agile practices at enterprise scale They've either read too much or too few Dilbert me thinks
|
|
|
|
|
A couple of rants I'm afraid....
#1 - Agile is a business process / people management idea - not a programming framework.
#2 - In the article they make much of the "release train that pushes code to production on a schedule....every ten weeks". That is so anti-agile it chills my soul.
|
|
|
|
|
Duncan Edwards Jones wrote: #2 - In the article they make much of the "release train that pushes code to production on a schedule....every ten weeks". That is so anti-agile it chills my soul.
I dunno, at my company, we have an "agile" project that has been in development for 2 years, and it still hasn't delivered working software yet. So 10 weeks sounds pretty agile from this side of the fence.
|
|
|
|
|
That first slide made my eyes bleed.
As a plus, the current trend of wrapping all sorts of meta-processes into software development is keeping all kinds of middle-managers and consultants employed!
|
|
|
|
|
Ow!
Sarcasm - it's not just a verbal skill - it's a lifestyle!
|
|
|
|
|
After 6 months you can’t really say someone is a beginner since, well, 6 months later is not the beginning. Everyone has to start somewhere
|
|
|
|
|
The Ecma General Assembly has officially approved ECMAScript 6, the latest standard edition of JavaScript.
I have seen the future, and its name is ES6.
|
|
|
|
|
So how many years do we have to wait until we can use it as "standard" in web apps?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
2025?
WIn10 LTS will keep IE11, and until they state otherwise I'm assuming the life cycle policy for business versions will remain at a decade.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Christopher Shields wrote: and its name is ES6X
Christopher Shields wrote: has officially approved
Good, that'll kill it.
|
|
|
|
|
It’s no secret that Google often builds its own custom hardware for its data centers, but what’s probably less known is that Google uses custom networking protocols that have been tweaked for use in its data centers instead of relying on standard Internet protocols to power its networks. There you go: now you can build your own copy
|
|
|
|
|
Google, Microsoft, Mozilla and the engineers on the WebKit project today announced that they have teamed up to launch WebAssembly, a new binary format for compiling applications for the web. Because it worked so well the other times people tried
|
|
|
|
|
You always have the best comments and I'm out here upvoting you. OKay? Okay?
|
|
|
|
|
You are too kind. Here's an upvote for your troubles
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: The team notes that the idea here is not to replace JavaScript... I wish people would finally try that...
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, this does enable just that. Wasm allows binaries to be delivered to the browser, roughly corresponding to the features in asm.js. As that is lower-level than JS, it is a declared intent that other languages can generate wasm modules.
Finally (at least in a year or so), it may be possible to write web code in another language without pre-compiling to JS. A vote for sanity.
Its very encouraging all major vendors are supporting it (with the notable exception (again) of crApple), otherwise it would be dead in the water.
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
Okay, but from my understanding of the article, a JavaScript engine is still required for execution. The only difference is that the input is now a serialized AST (that can originate from another language than JavaScript, of course) instead of a text file that needs to be parsed. It helps performance, but it is not as native as it could be. It's just like Java or .NET, it still needs a execution engine to bring it to the metal.
|
|
|
|