|
I’m in the process of researching the origin and evolution of data science as a discipline and a profession. Here are the milestones that I have picked up so far, tracking the evolution of the term “data science,” attempts to define it, and some related developments. All the data points that lead up to big data.
|
|
|
|
|
Owners of Cisco/Linksys home routers got a nasty shock this week, when their devices automatically downloaded a new operating system, which locked out device owners. After the update, the only way to reconfigure your router was to create an account on Cisco's "cloud" service, signing up to a service agreement that gives Cisco the right to spy on your Internet use and sell its findings, and also gives them the right to disconnect you (and lock you out of your router) whenever they feel like it.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
i love the Cisco PR lackey who shows up in comments and is then set upon like a chuck roast in a lion's cage.
|
|
|
|
|
In the future (last month), nobody will sell anything, just lease it, so that they can control you.
|
|
|
|
|
And Cisco just made my list of "brands to never buy". If a free service wants to try and track me that's one thing (they have to pay their bills too, but that doesn't mean I'll make it easy for them to do it), but I will not have a product I paid for using my information as an additional revenue stream, nor will I give a company the option to shut down my personal equipment.
|
|
|
|
|
I was considering buying some Cisco equipment, with this, i believe i will look elsewhere.
|
|
|
|
|
They've been on my "do not buy" list for a rather long time.
|
|
|
|
|
Or you could just downgrade the current firmware.
=====
\ | /
\|/
|
|-----|
| |
|_ |
_) | /
_) __/_
_) ____
| /|
| / |
| |
|-----|
|
=====
===
=
|
|
|
|
|
Which would be easier if they would at least post the instructions online. Requiring you to call them for instructions is BS.
|
|
|
|
|
Will that make my used router more or less valuable on ebay?
|
|
|
|
|
What the hell is wrong with people/organizations. That is SO MESSED UP!
I can't hardly believe it .. I'm pissed and I don't even own a Cisco product !
UBX ..
|
|
|
|
|
The Register has been informed.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think it's cisco that will be disconnecting you. And I'm sure it's automatic data gathering, and who's really residing in that cloud, d-h-s?.
Glad I have a vintage linksys 2002 router at home. Thinking about replacing it with a new G37.
|
|
|
|
|
You're replacing a router with a G37? I hope you're getting the convertible[^].
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
That's funny Chris, I meant the other G37!, the ultimate in protection from outside forces.
other g37 - surprise
Actually your idea is better. That's a great looking car and yes the convertible for a little Sunday Cruise down PCH to Laguna Beach destination Las Brisas, and some Margarita's. I actually prefer Porsche 911's, just a fun driven car.
Las Brisas over looking the Pacific Ocean
|
|
|
|
|
|
That just makes me sick.
Bill Gates is a very rich man today... and do you want to know why? The answer is one word: versions.
Dave Barry
Read more at BrainyQuote[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Information is everything and information is king.
I've never studied the CodeProject T&C but does CP sell or give away the information about its almost 10 million subscribers? I'm sure there's a lot of information in there that other companies would like to harvest and tap into.
Cisco is but one facet of a multi-faceted information diamond mine.
"I do not have to forgive my enemies, I have had them all shot." — Ramón Maria Narváez (1800-68).
"I don't need to shoot my enemies, I don't have any." - Me (2012).
|
|
|
|
|
PHS241 wrote: I've never studied the CodeProject T&C
Oooo! You checked a box when you signed up, stating that you had read and understood the conditions... Did you not send an email first requesting clearance to join without clause 17.14.2.8(iii)? The one handing CodeProject all your worldly goods? Everyone else did!
The site TOS are pretty clear: "Registration information becomes the non-exclusive property of The Code Project and may be used by The Code Project for market research, marketing, improvements to our Services, and for such purposes as may be set out in our privacy statement." http://www.codeproject.com/info/TermsOfUse.aspx[^], section 5
Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water
|
|
|
|
|
You also get your very own Bob[^].
|
|
|
|
|
In this usage, what is the definition of "non-exclusive property"? And how can my "personal and demographic information as prompted by the applicable registration form" ever be anyone's property but my own, whether exclusive or non-exclusive? Is my name and/or username now the property of The Code Project? My home or email addresses? If so, that's very disturbing. Can I terminate TCP's claim by closing my account?
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP.
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome to the future, where goods you buy also track you for your own sake (hold on i believe i have seen this before, start with A and end with pple), what the hell is Cisco thinking of?, it is dealing with technology professionals that recommends their products, if we don't it will simply vanish from the picture.
|
|
|
|
|
PHS241 wrote: I've never studied the CodeProject T&C but does CP sell or give away the information about its almost 10 million subscribers? I'm sure there's a lot of information in there that other companies would like to harvest and tap into.
But CP is also a "free" service. We don't pay to use it, but the money to maintain it has to come from somewhere, and I'm fine with that, it's a trade: my information for CP's service.
On the other hand, you have to pay Cisco for one of their routers. This is a one time payment for a physical item. You do not incur and additional cost to them after that (besides perhaps customer support, but for a good product the majority of customers will not need it, and some small bandwidth charges for software updates). There is no trade going on here, they are simply taking your data and giving you nothing in return. Personally, I find that to be unacceptable.
|
|
|
|
|
Some clarity here..
First, you have to dig a bit.. this doesn't apply to ALL Cisco routers, only their 'App Enabled Routers' that have automatic updating turned ON. I own a Cisco router (not an App Enabled one) and I didn't get auto-updated and have not been forced to sign up for the cloud.
This seems a lot like a knee jerk reaction on some folks part to an ill-considered move on Cisco's part. There is no doubt that this is a seriously stupid move on Cisco's part. No doubt at all. But I'm not personally prepared to go full-paranoid on Cisco as of yet. Cisco has a reputation that must be maintained to continue to sell products. And plenty of competitors that would love to see it trip badly.
Keep in mind that the internet is a giant echo chamber. It tends to magnify things due to herd behavior.. If you read the comments about this carefully you'll see that many folks don't even own Cisco.. they are just expressing their confidence that this is 'evil corporations at it again'.. a paranoid response.
I've lived in the 'belly of the beast' of large corporations for more than half my career. I've never seen signs of overt evil, but I've seen PLENTY of mediocrity and outright stupdity.
The writer of the original article, in my opinion, is showing an extreme lack of judgement.. none of the details around how many customers are affected/type of routers/conditions of update are even listed. Its just a 'Cisco did some evil stuff' hit piece. In a word, typical stupid reporting/commentary (something I've seen so much lately it makes my head spin).
Caveat Emptor doesn't apply just to retail goods.. it goes for news too.
Just my 2 cents..
modified 9-Jul-12 13:34pm.
|
|
|
|
|
When a corporation willfully violates laws that most common people understand to be in affect, that corporation is evil.
It is unlawful to install software on a device that prevents that device to be used as intended. CISCO may have utilized their auto update program to do this, but they still violated the law in doing so.
In addition, by requiring those affected to create a cloud account in order to utilize the devices that they already legally purchased and own, CISCO has taken unlawful possession of the processing power of those devices. They in affect have taken possession of the device and are requiring owners to pay a fee to regain the use of their legally owned property.
Regardless of user licensing agreements, CISCO did not and does not have a legal right to corrupt and disable a device that they received consideration for; from the purchaser of the device.
This is corporate greed gone a muck. Not only should the CISCO executives have known better than to do this, the developers who participated in this criminal activity should have know better and refused to participate in said criminal activity.
Scott A. Tovey
|
|
|
|